AronL. (1999). Clinical choices and the relational matrix. Psychoanalytic Dialogues9:1–30.
2.
BernardiR.E. (1989). The role of paradigmatic determinants in psychoanalytic understanding. International Journal of Psychoanalysis70:341–357.
3.
DeWittK.N.KaltreiderN.WeissD.S.HorowitzM.J. (1983). Judging change in psychotherapy: Reliability of clinical formulations. Archives of General Psychiatry40:1121–1128.
4.
FisherS.GreenbergR.P. (1977). The Scientific Credibility of Freud’s Theories and Therapy. New York: Basic Books.
5.
FosshageJ.L.LoewC.A., eds. (1987). Dream Interpretation: A Comparative Study. Rev ed. New York: PMA.
6.
GloverE. (1952). Research methods in psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis33:403–409.
7.
PeterfreundE. (1983). The Process of Psychoanalytic Therapy: Models and Strategies. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
8.
RapaportD. (1960). The Structure of Psychoanalytic Theory: A Systematizing Attempt. New York: International Universities Press.
9.
RosenbaumM.MuroffM., eds. (1984). Anna O.: Fourteen Contemporary Interpretations. New York: Free Press.
10.
Rubovitz-SeitzP. (1998). Depth-Psychological Understanding: The Methodological Grounding of Clinical Interpretations. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
11.
RunyonW.M. (1981). Why did Van Gogh cut off his ear? The problem of alternative explanations in psychobiography. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology40:1070–1077.
12.
SeitzP. (1966). The consensus problem in psychoanalytic research. In Methods of Research in Psychotherapy, ed. GottschalkL.AuerbachA.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 209–225.
13.
SklanskyM.A.IsaacsK.S.LevitovE.S.HaggardE.A. (1966). Verbal interaction and levels of meaning in psychotherapy. Archives of General Psychiatry14:158–170.
14.
SpenceD.P. (1982). Narrative Truth and Historical Truth: Meaning and Interpretation in Psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.
15.
ThomäH.GrünzigH.J.BöckenfördeH.KächeleH. (1976). Das Konsensusproblem in der Psychoanalyse. Psyche30:978–1027.
16.
WeberJ.ElinsonJ.MossL.M. (1966). The application of ego strength scales to psychoanalytic clinic records. In Developments in Psychoanalysis at Columbia University, ed. GoldmanG.ShapiroD.New York: Haffner, pp. 215–281.
17.
WermanD. (1979). Methodological problems in the psychoanalytic interpretation of literature: A review of studies on Sophocles’ Antigone. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association27:451–478.