This essay treats Freud’s “Observations on Transference-Love,” written a hundred years ago, as the quintessential psychoanalytic document, defining the clinical setup, charting its dangers, and providing ethical precepts for guiding treatment. Above all, in the context of those ethical questions, Freud’s paper confronts the immense power and necessary strangeness of the transference—that form of love, or erotic bond, that fuels the healing process. The “potion”—an artificial yet powerfully real attachment—is the agent of a temporary induced blindness that gives access to a region otherwise inaccessible. A dream is presented to demonstrate that process. Freud, in describing this incendiary arrangement, likens it to a fire in a theater. The fire, the author proposes, is in the script.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BirdB. (1972). Notes on transference: Universal phenomenon and hardest part of analysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association20:267–301.
2.
BlumH.P. (1981). The forbidden quest and the analytic ideal: The superego and insight. Psychoanalytic Quarterly50:535–556.
3.
BreuerJ.FreudS. (1895). Studies on hysteria. Standard Edition2.
4.
BulfinchT. (1964). Bulfinch’s Mythology. London: Spring Books.
5.
CesioF. (1993). The oedipal tragedy in the psychoanalytic process: Transference love. In On Freud’s “Observations on Transference-Love,” ed. PersonE.S.HagelinA.FonagyP.New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 130–145.
6.
ForresterJ. (1990). The Seductions of Psychoanalysis: Freud, Lacan and Derrida. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
FreudA.BurlinghamD. (1943). War and Children. New York: Medical War Books.
8.
FreudS. (1912a). The dynamics of transference. Standard Edition12:99–108.
9.
FreudS. (1912b). On the universal tendency to debasement in the sphere of love. Standard Edition11:179–190.
10.
FreudS. (1914). Remembering, repeating and working-though. Standard Edition12:147–156.
11.
FreudS. (1915). Observations on transference-love. Standard Edition12:159–171.
12.
FreudS. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. Standard Edition21:64–145.
13.
FreudS. (1937). Analysis terminable and interminable. Standard Edition23:216–253.
14.
FriedmanL. (1991). On the therapeutic action of Loewald’s theory. In The Work of Hans Loewald: An Introduction and Commentary, ed FogelG.I.Northvale, NJ: Aronson, pp. 91–104.
15.
FriedmanL. (1997). Ferrum, ignis, and medicina: Return to the crucible. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association45:20–36.
16.
FriedmanL. (2005). Psychoanalytic treatment: Thick soup or thin gruel?Psychoanalytic Inquiry25:418–439.
17.
GabbardG.O. (2009). What is a “good enough” termination?Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association57:575–594.
18.
GreenblattS. (1997). Commentary onA Midsummer Night’s Dream. In The Norton Shakespeare, ed. GreenblattS.New York: Norton, pp. 805–814.
19.
HeimannP. (1950). On counter-transference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis31:81–84.
20.
HeimannP. (1956). Dynamics of transference interpretations. International Journal of Psychoanalysis37:303–310.
21.
HernandezM. (1993). Footnote to a footnote to “Observations on Transference-Love.” In On Freud’s “Observations on Transference-Love,” ed. PersonE.S.HagelinA.FonagyP.New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 96–101.
22.
KhanM.M.R. (1973). The role of illusion in the analytic space and process. Annual of Psychoanalysis1:231–246.
23.
KohonG. (1984). Reflections on Dora: The case of hysteria. International Journal of Psychoanalysis65:73–84.
24.
LevineF. (2003). The forbidden quest and the slippery slope: Roots of authoritarianism in psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association51(Suppl.):203–245.
25.
LoewaldH.W. (1960). On the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980, pp. 221–256.
26.
LoewaldH.W. (1971). The transference neurosis: Comments on the concept and the phenomenon. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980, pp. 302–314.
27.
MacalpineI. (1950). The development of transference. Psychoanalytic Quarterly19:501–539.
28.
OrgelS. (1997). Commentary on Friedman. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association45:57–61.
29.
PinskyE. (2002). Mortal gifts: A two-part essay on the therapist’s mortality. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis & Dynamic Psychiatry30:173–204.
30.
PinskyE. (2011). The Olympian delusion. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association59:351–375.
31.
PinskyE. (2012). Physic himself must fade: A view of the therapeutic offering through the lens of mortality. American Imago69:29–56.
32.
RoudR. (1980). Jean Renoir to 1939. In Cinema: A Critical Dictionary, Volume Two, ed. RoudR.New York: Viking, pp. 835–845.
33.
StollerR.J. (1975). Perversion: The Erotic Form of Hatred. New York: Pantheon Books.
34.
TarachowS. (1962). Interpretation and reality in psychotherapy. International Journal of Psychoanalysis43:377–387.
35.
TarachowS. (1963). An Introduction to Psychotherapy. New York: International Universities Press.
36.
WeilS. (1963). Gravity and Grace. London: Routledge.
37.
WinnicottD.W. (1949). Hate in the counter-transference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis30:69–74.
38.
WinnicottD.W. (1969). The use of an object. International Journal of Psychoanalysis50:711–716.
