Enactments are investigated from the process-oriented focus of our therapeutic approach. By embedding their occurrence within the on-going flow of nonlinear dyadic process, we focus on the subtle back-and-forth between patient and analyst, as well as the importance of what we call now moments. An alternative to the dissociative self-state model is offered that emphasizes implicit memory processes in bodily comportment and style of relating with others. We suggest that change occurs through the emergence of new relational (i.e., procedural) skills within a therapeutic relationship that is self-organizing at more inclusive levels. Treating enactment as an emergent property of the dyad means not concentrating on the level of the individual components of a system. Rather, it means regarding enactment as a property of the entire system, without which there would be no emergent property. Going forward, we suggest use of the term relational apprehension in referring to the complex process of grasping a gestalt of relational meaning as an integration of perceptions, feelings, images and imaginings, sensations, fantasies, thoughts, and intuitions. Two brief case vignettes from the literature are discussed in order to illustrate this view.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AronL. (2003). The paradoxical place of enactment in psychoanalysis: Introduction. Psychoanalytic Dialogues13:623–631.
2.
AronL. (2006). Analytic impasse and the third: Clinical implications of intersubjectivity theory. International Journal of Psychoanalysis87:349–368.
3.
BenjaminJ. (2010). Where’s the gap and what’s the difference? The relational view of intersubjectivity, multiple selves, and enactments. Contemporary Psychoanalysis46:112–119.
4.
BergsonH. (1896). Matter and Memory, transl. PaulN.M.PalmerW.S.New York: Zone Books.
5.
BlackM. (2003). Enactment: Analytic musings on energy, language, and personal growth. Psychoanalytic Dialogues13:633–655.
6.
Boston Change Process Study Group (2010). Change in Psychotherapy: A Unifying Paradigm. New York: Norton.
7.
BrazeltonT.B. (2006). Touchpoints: Birth to Three. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.
8.
BrombergP.M. (1998). Standing in the Spaces: Essays on Clinical Process, Trauma, and Dissociation. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
9.
BrombergP.M. (2006). Awakening the Dreamer. Mahwah, NJ: Analytic Press.
10.
BrombergP.M. (2011). The Shadow of the Tsunami and the Growth of the Relational Mind. New York: Routledge.
11.
BucciW. (1997). Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Science: A Multiple Code Theory. New York: Guilford Press.
12.
CoburnW.J. (2000). The organizing forces of contemporary psychoanalysis: Reflections on nonlinear dynamic systems theory. Psychoanalytic Psychology17:750–770.
13.
CoburnW.J. (2007). Don’t drag me around: The phenomenology of complexity in group psychotherapy: Commentary on paper by Robert Grossmark. Psychoanalytic Dialogues17:501–512.
14.
DaviesJ.M.FrawleyM.G. (1994). Treating the Adult Survivor of Childhood Sexual Abuse: A Psychoanalytic Perspective. New York: Basic Books.
15.
FuchsT. (2011a). Body memory and the unconscious. In Founding Psychoanalysis: Phenomenological Theory of Subjectivity and the Psychoanalytical Experience, ed. LohmarD.BrudzinskaJ.Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 69–82.
16.
FuchsT. (2011b). The phenomenology of body memory. In Body Memory: Phenomenology and Therapy, ed. KochS.FuchsT.SummaM.MüllerC.Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 9–22.
HusserlE. (2005). Phantasy, Image Consciousness, and Memory: Essays from 1898–1925, transl. BroughJ.B.Dordrecht: Springer.
19.
JacobsT.J. (1986). On countertransference enactments. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association34:289–307.
20.
KatzG.A. (1998). Where the action is: The enacted dimension of analytic process. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association46:1129–1167.
21.
KatzG.A. (2002). Missing in action: The enacted dimension of analytic process in a patient with traumatic object loss. In Symbolization and Desymbolization: Essays in Honor of Norbert Freedman, ed. LaskyR.New York: Other Press, pp. 407–430.
22.
Lyons-RuthK. (1999). The two-person unconscious: Intersubjecive dialogue, enactive relational representation, and the emergence of new forms of relational organization. Psychoanalytic Inquiry19:576–617.
23.
PiersC. (2007). Emergence: When a difference in degree becomes a difference in kind. In Self-Organizing Complexity in Psychological Systems, ed. PiersC.MullerJ.P.BrentJ.New York: Aronson, pp. 83–110.
24.
ReddyV. (2008). How Infants Know Minds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
25.
ReisB. (2009). Performative and enactive features of psychoanalytic witnessing: The transference as the scene of address. International Journal of Psychoanalysis90:1359–1372.
26.
ReisB. (2010). Enactive fields: An approach to interaction in the Kleinian-Bionian model: Commentary on paper by Lawrence J. Brown. Psychoanalytic Dialogues20:695–703.
27.
RizzolattiG.FogassiL.GalleseV. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Neuroscience2:661–670.
28.
RussellP. (2006). The theory of the crunch. Smith College Studies in Social Work76:9–21.
29.
SafranJ.D.MuranJ.C. (1996). The resolution of ruptures in the therapeutic alliance. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology64:447–458.
30.
SanderL. (2008). Living Systems, Evolving Consciousness, and the Emerging Person: A Selection of Papers from the Life Work of Louis Sander. New York: Analytic Press.
31.
SeligmanS. (2005). Dynamic systems theories as a meta-framework for psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues15:285–319.
32.
SternD.B. (2003). Unformulated Experience: From Dissociation to Imagination in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
33.
SternD.B. (2010). Partners in Thought: Working with Unformulated Experience, Dissociation, and Enactment. New York: Routledge.
34.
SternD.N. (1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York: Basic Books.
35.
SternD.N. (1995). The Motherhood Constellation: A Unified View of Parent-Infant Psychotherapy. London: Karnac Books.
36.
SternD.N. (2010). Forms of Vitality: Exploring Dynamic Experience in Psychology, the Arts, Psychotherapy and Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
