AndradeV.M. (2003). Affect, thought, and consciousness: The Freudian theory of psychic structuring from an evolutionary perspective. NeuroPsychoanalysis5:71–80.
2.
ArlowJ.A. (1993). Two discussions of the “mind of the analyst” and a response from Madeleine Baranger. International Journal of Psychoanalysis74:1147–1155.
3.
ArlowJ.A.BrennerC. (1990). The psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Quarterly59:678–692.
4.
ArlowJ.A.FreudA.Lampl–De GrootJ.BeresD. (1968). Panel discussion. International Journal of Psychoanalysis49:506–512.
5.
BachrachH.M. (1993). The Columbia Records Project and the evolution of psychoanalytic outcome research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association41:279–297.
6.
BaudryF. (1991). The relevance of the analyst’s character and attitudes to his work. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association39:917–938.
7.
BermanE. (2000). The utopian fantasy of a new person and the danger of a false analytic self. Psychoanalytic Psychology17:38–60.
8.
BrandlY.BrunsG.GerlachA.HauS.JanssenP.L.KächeleH.LeichsenringF.Leuzinger-BohleberM.MertensW.RudolfG.SchlösserA.-M.SpringerA.StuhrU.WindausE. (2004). Psychoanalytische Therapie [Psychoanalytic therapy]. Forum der Psychoanalyse20:13–125.
9.
BrennerC. (2000). Observations on some aspects of current psychoanalytic theories. Psychoanalytic Quarterly69:597–632.
10.
BuchholzM.B. (1996). Metaphern der “Kur”: Eine qualitative Studie zum psychotherapeutischen Prozess [Metaphors of the “Cure”: A Qualitative Study of the Psychotherapeutic Process]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
11.
CaberniteL. (1982). The selection and functions of the training analyst in analytic training institutes in Latin America. International Review of Psychoanalysis9:398–417.
12.
DahmerH. (1973). Libido und Gesellschaft [Libido and Society]. Frankfurt a.M: Suhrkamp.
13.
De BoorC.MitscherlichA. (1973). Verstehende Psychosomatik: Ein Stiefkind der Medizin [Understanding psychosomatics: A stepchild of medicine]. Psyche27:1–20.
14.
DevereuxG. (1967). Angst und Methode in den Verhaltenswissenschaften [Anxiety and Methods in the Behavioral Sciences]. Munich: Hanser.
15.
ErleJ.GoldbergD. (1984). Problems in the assessment of analyzability. Psychoanalytic Quarterly48:48–84.
16.
FrankG. (2000). The status of psychoanalytic theory today: There is an elephant there. Psychoanalytic Psychology17:174–179.
17.
FreedmanN.HoffenbergJ.D.VarusN.FroschA. (1999). The effectiveness of psychoanalytic psychotherapy: The role of treatment duration, frequency of sessions, and the therapeutic relationship. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association47:741–772.
18.
FreudS. (1910). The further prospects of psycho-analytic therapy. Standard Edition11:141–151.
19.
FreudS. (1926). The question of lay analysis: Conversations with an impartial person. Standard Edition20:183–250.
20.
FreudS. (1933). New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. Standard Edition22:5–182.
21.
GabbardG.O.WestenD. (2003). Rethinking therapeutic action. International Journal of Psychoanalysis84:823–841.
22.
GayP. (1988). Freud: A Life for Our Time. New York: Norton.
23.
GoldbergA. (1994). Farewell to the objective analyst. International Journal of Psychoanalysis75:21–30.
24.
GrayS.H. (2002). Evidence-based psychotherapeutics. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis & Dynamic Psychiatry30: 3–16.
25.
GreenA. (1996). What kind of research for psychoanalysis?IPA Newsletter5:10–14.
26.
GreenA. (2005). The illusion of common ground and mythical pluralism. International Journal of Psychoanalysis86:627–632.
27.
HabermasJ. (1968). Knowledge and Human Interests, transl. ShapiroJ.J.London: Heinemann, 1972.
28.
HamiltonV. (1996). The Analyst’s Preconscious. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
29.
HanlyC. (1983). A problem of theory testing. International Review of Psychoanalysis10:393–405.
30.
JonesE.E.WindholzM. (1990). The psychoanalytic case study: Toward a method for systematic inquiry. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association38:985–1015.
31.
KantrowitzJ.L.KatzA.L.PaolittoF. (1990a). Followup of psychoanalysis five to ten years after termination: I. Stability of change. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association38:471–496.
32.
KantrowitzJ.LKatzA.L.PaolittoF. (1990b). Followup of psychoanalysis five to ten years after termination: II. Development of the self-analytic function. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association38:637–654.
33.
KantrowitzJ.L.KatzA.L.PaolittoF. (1990c). Followup of psychoanalysis five to ten years after termination: III. The relation between the resolution of the transference and the patient-analyst match. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association38:655–678.
34.
KeiserS. (1972). Report to the board on professional standards. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association20:518–539.
35.
KernbergO.F. (2012). Suicide prevention for psychoanalytic institutes and societies. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association60: 707–719.
36.
KirsnerD. (2001). The future of psychoanalytic institutes. Psychoanalytic Psychology18:195–212.
37.
KlauberJ. (1972). On the relationship of transference and interpretation in psychoanalytic therapy. International Journal of Psychoanalysis53:385–391.
38.
Leuzinger-BohleberM.StuhrU.RügerB.BeutelM. (2003). How to study the ‘quality of psychoanalytic treatments’ and their long-term effects on patients’ well-being: A representative, multi-perspective follow-up study. International Journal of Psychoanalysis84:263–290.
39.
LorenzerA. (1970). Kritik des psychoanalytischen Symbolbegriffs [Critique of the Psychoanalytic Concept of Symbols]. Frankfurt a.M: Suhrkamp.
40.
LorenzerA. (1974). Die Wahrheit der psychoanalytischen Erkenntnis: Ein historisch-materialistischer Entwurf [The Truth of Psychoanalytic Knowledge: An Historical-Materialist Outline]. Frankfurt a.M: Suhrkamp.
41.
MillJ.S. (1862). A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: A Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. London: Routledge, 1905.
42.
OrgelS. (1982). The selection and functions of the training analyst in North American institutes. International Review of Psychoanalysis9:417–434.
SandellR.BlombergJ.LazarA.CarlssonJ.BrobergJ.SchuberJ. (2000). Varieties of long-term outcome among patients in psychoanalysis and long-term psychotherapy: A review of findings in the Stockholm Outcome of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy Project. International Journal of Psychoanalysis81:921–942.
45.
SashinJ.I.EldredS.H.Van AmerongenS.T. (1975). A search for predictive factors in institute supervised cases: A retrospective study of 183 cases from 1959–1966 at the Boston Psychoanalytic Society and Institute. International Journal of Psychoanalysis56:343–359.
46.
SchlessingerN.RobbinsF. (1983). A Developmental View of the Psychoanalytic Process: Follow Up Studies and Their Consequences. Emotions and Behavior Monograph 1. New York: International Universities Press.
47.
VaughanS.C.RooseS.P. (1995). The analytic process: Clinical and research definitions. International Journal of Psychoanalysis76:343–356.
48.
VaughanS.C.SpitzerR.DaviesM.RooseS. (1997). The definition and assessment of analytic process: Can analysts agree?International Journal of Psychoanalysis78:59–73.
49.
ZepfS.ZepfF.D. (2009). Psychoanalysis and qualitative psychotherapy research: Some epistemological remarks. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis & Dynamic Psychiatry37:645–664.