Therapeutic action depends on our freedom to allow ourselves novel, unbidden experience. How does this novelty arise? What is the process by which some portion of the possibilities inherent in any moment’s unformulated experience are created or selected and emerge in consciousness? And what does it mean to think of freedom in this context? What does it mean for the formulation of experience to be free? In the frame of reference adopted here, the formulation of experience depends on the conscious and unconscious events of the interpersonal field. The field facilitates some formulations of experience and prevents others. Thus, whatever we can do to make it possible for the analytic relationship to evolve freely, without constraint or constriction, is the best way we have to encourage the freedom to experience. “Relational freedom” underpins therapeutic action. A clinical case is described at length to illustrate these ideas.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BalintM. (1969). The Basic Fault: Therapeutic Aspects of Regression. London: Tavistock Publications.
2.
BarangerM.BarangerW. (1969). The analytic situation as a dynamic field. International Journal of Psychoanalysis89:795–826, 2008.
3.
BarangerM.BarangerW. (2009). The Work of Confluence: Listening and Interpreting in the Psychoanalytic Field, ed. FioriniL.G.London: Karnac Books.
4.
BarangerW. (1979). Spiral process and the dynamic field. In The Work of Confluence: Listening and Interpreting in the Psychoanalytic Field, ed. FioriniL.G.London: Karnac Books, 2009, pp. 45–61.
5.
BenjaminJ. (1990). Recognition and destruction: An outline of intersubjectivity. In Relational Psychoanalysis: The Emergence of a Tradition, ed. MitchellS.A.AronL.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, 1999, pp. 183–200.
6.
BenjaminJ. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanalytic Quarterly73:5–46.
7.
BollasC. (2001). Freudian intersubjectivity: Commentary on paper by Julie Gerhardt and Annie Sweetnam. Psychoanalytic Dialogues11:93–106.
8.
BrombergP.M. (1998). Standing in the Spaces: Essays on Clinical Process, Trauma, and Dissociation. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
BrombergP.M. (2011). The Shadow of the Tsunami and the Growth of the Relational Mind. New York: Routledge.
11.
BrownL.J. (2011). Intersubjective Processes and the Unconscious: An Integration of Freudian, Kleinian and Bionian Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
12.
ChianeseD. (1997). Constructions and the Analytic Field: History, Scenes, and Destiny. London: Routledge, 2007.
13.
CivitareseG. (2008). The Intimate Room: Theory and Technique of the Analytic Field. London: Routledge.
14.
CivitareseG. (2012). The Violence of Emotions: Bion and Post-Bionian Psychoanalysis. Hove, UK: Routledge.
15.
DaviesJ.M. (1996). Linking the pre-analytic with the postclassical: Integration, dissociation, and the multiplicity of unconscious processes. Contemporary Psychoanalysis32:553–576.
16.
DaviesJ.M. (1997). Dissociation, therapeutic enactment, and transference—countertransference processes: A discussion of papers on childhood sexual abuse by S. Grand and J. Sarnat. Gender & Psychoanalysis2:241–257.
17.
DaviesJ.M. (1998). Multiple perspectives on multiplicity. Psychoanalytic Dialogues8:195–206.
18.
DaviesJ.M. (1999). Getting cold feet defining “safe-enough” borders: Dissociation, multiplicity, and integration in the analyst’s experience. Psychoanalytic Quarterly78:184–208.
19.
DaviesJ.M. (2004). Whose bad objects are we anyway? Repetition and our elusive love affair with evil. Psychoanalytic Dialogues14:711–732.
20.
EhrenbergD.B. (1992). The Intimate Edge: Extending the Reach of Psychoanalytic Interaction. New York: Norton.
21.
FerroA. (2006). Clinical implications of Bion’s thought. International Journal of Psychoanalysis87:989–1003.
22.
FerroA. (2009). Transformations in dreaming and characters in the psychoanalytic field. International Journal of Psychoanalysis90:209–230.
23.
FerroA.BasileR., eds. (2009). The Analytic Field: A Clinical Concept. Hove, UK: Routledge.
24.
FiscaliniJ. (2004). Coparticipant Psychoanalysis: Toward a New Theory of Clinical Inquiry. New York: Columbia University Press.
25.
FreudS. (1913). On beginning the treatment. Standard Edition12:121–144.
26.
GersonS. (1996). Neutrality, resistance, and self-disclosure in an intersubjective psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues6:623–645.
27.
GersonS. (2004). The relational unconscious: A core element of intersubjectivity, thirdness, and clinical process. Psychoanalytic Quarterly73:63–98.
28.
GreenbergJ. (1995). Psychoanalytic technique and the interactive matrix. Psychoanalytic Quarterly64:1–22.
29.
HoffmanI.Z. (2006). The myths of free association and the potentials of the analytic relationship. International Journal of Psychoanalysis87:43–61.
30.
JamesW. (1890). Principles of Psychology. 2 vols. New York: Henry Holt.
31.
LevensonE.A. (1972). The Fallacy of Understanding: An Inquiry into the Changing Structure of Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
32.
LevensonE.A. (1983). The Ambiguity of Change: An Inquiry into the Nature of Psychoanalytic Reality. New York: Basic Books.
33.
LevensonE.A. (1991). The Purloined Self: Interpersonal Perspectives in Psychoanalysis, ed. A.H. Feiner. New York: Contemporary Psychoanalysis Books.
34.
MitchellS.A. (1988). Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis: An Integration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
35.
MitchellS.A. (2000). Relationality: From Attachment to Intersubjectivity. New York: Routledge.
36.
MurphyG.CattellE. (1952). Sullivan’s field theory. In The Contributions of Harry Stack Sullivan: A Symposium on Interpersonal Theory in Psychiatry and Social Science, ed. MullahyP.New York: Hermitage House, pp. 161–179.
37.
OgdenT.H. (1994). Subjects of Analysis. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
38.
RackerH. (1968). Transference and Countertransference. New York: International Universities Press.
39.
SternD.B. (1983). Unformulated experience: From familiar chaos to creative disorder. Contemporary Psychoanalysis19:71–99.
SternD.B. (1997). Unformulated Experience: From Dissociation to Imagination in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
42.
SternD.B. (2003). The fusion of horizons: Dissociation, enactment, and understanding. Psychoanalytic Dialogues13:843–873.
43.
SternD.B. (2004). The eye sees itself: Dissociation, enactment, and the achievement of conflict. Contemporary Psychoanalysis40:197–237.
44.
SternD.B. (2009a). Partners in thought: A clinical process theory of narrative. Psychoanalytic Quarterly78:101–131.
45.
SternD.B. (2009b). Shall the twain meet? Metaphor, dissociation, and co-occurrence. Psychoanalytic Inquiry29:79–90.
46.
SternD.B. (2010). Partners in Thought: Working with Unformulated Experience, Dissociation, and Enactment. New York: Routledge.
47.
SternD.B. (2012). Witnessing across time: Accessing the present from the past and the past from the present. Psychoanalytic Quarterly81:53–81.
48.
SternD.B. (in press a). Field theory in psychoanalysis: I. Harry Stack Sullivan and Madeleine and Willy Baranger. Psychoanalytic Dialogues.
49.
SternD.B. (in press b). Field theory in psychoanalysis: II. Bionian field theory and contemporary interpersonal/relational psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues.
50.
SullivanH.S. (1940). Conceptions of Modern Psychiatry. New York: Norton, 1953.
51.
SullivanH.S. (1953). The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. New York: Norton.
52.
SullivanH.S. (1956). Selective inattention. In Clinical Studies in Psychiatry. New York: Norton, pp. 38–76.
53.
SymingtonN. (1983). The analyst’s act of freedom as agent of therapeutic change. International Review of Psychoanalysis10:283–291.
54.
TublinS. (2011). Discipline and freedom in relational technique. Contemporary Psychoanalysis47:519–546.
55.
WolsteinB. (1959). Countertransference. New York: Grune & Stratton.
56.
WolsteinB. (1964). Freedom to Experience: A Study of Psychological Change from a Psychoanalytic Point of View. New York: Grune & Stratton.
