EagleM.N.WolitzkyD.L. (2011). Systematic empirical research versus clinical case studies: A valid antagonism?Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association59:791–817.
2.
FonagyP. (2002). Evidence-based medicine and its justifications. In Outcomes of Psychoanalytic Treatment: Perspectives for Therapists and Researchers, ed. Leuzinger-BohleberM.TargetM.Philadelphia: Whurr Publishers, pp. 53–59.
FreudS. (1919). Lines of advance in psycho-analytic therapy. Standard Edition17:159–168.
5.
HoffmanI.Z. (1998). Ritual and Spontaneity in the Psychoanalytic Process: A Dialectical-Constructivist View. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
6.
HoffmanI.Z. (2006a). Forging difference out of similarity: The multiplicity of corrective experience. Psychoanalytic Quarterly75:715–751.
7.
HoffmanI.Z. (2006b). The myths of free association and the potentials of the analytic relationship. International Journal of Psychoanalysis87:43–61.
8.
HoffmanI.Z. (2009). Doublethinking our way to “scientific” legitimacy: The desiccation of human experience. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association57:1043–1069.
9.
HoffmanI.Z. (in press). Response to Safran: The development of critical psychoanalytic sensibility. Psychoanalytic Dialogues.
10.
KazdinA.E. (1998). Research Design in Clinical Psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11.
LaytonL.HollanderN.C.GutwillS., eds. (2006). Psychoanalysis, Class and Politics: Encounters in the Clinical Setting. New York: Routledge.
12.
LuytenP.BlattS.J.CorveleynJ. (2006). Minding the gap between positivism and hermeneutics in psychoanalytic research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association54:571–610.
13.
OrlinskyD.E. (2006). Comments on the state of psychotherapy research (as I see it). Newsletter of the North American Society for Psychotherapy Research (NASPR)30:2–3.
14.
SassL.A. (1989). Humanism, hermeneutics, and humanistic psychoanalysis: Differing conceptions of subjectivity. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought12:433–504).
15.
SassL.A.WoolfolkR.L. (1988). Psychoanalysis and the hermeneutic turn: A critique of Narrative Truth and Historical Truth. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association36:429–454.
16.
SchönD. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
17.
ShedlerJ. (2004). Review of Clinical and Observational Psychoanalytic Research: Roots of a Controversy, ed. SandlerJ.SandlerA.-M.DaviesR.Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association52:610–618.
18.
SpenceD.P. (1988). Tough and tender-minded hermeneutics. In Hermeneutics and Psychological Theory: Interpretive Perspectives on Personality, Psychotherapy, and Psychopathology, ed. MesserS.B.SassL.A.WoolfolkR.L.New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, pp. 62–84.
19.
StruppH.H. (2001). Implications of the empirically supported treatment movement for psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues11:605–619.
20.
WachtelP. (1997). Psychoanalysis, Behavior Therapy, and the Relational World. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21.
WestenD. (2002). The language of psychoanalytic discourse. Psychoanalytic Dialogues12:857–898.