BarlowD. (2011). Negative effects from psychological treatment. The American Psychologist65:13–20.
2.
BeebeB. (2005). Mother-infant research informs mother-infant treatment. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child60:7–46.
3.
BerginA.E.StruppH. (1972). Changing Frontiers in the Science of Psychotherapy. Chicago: Atherton.
4.
CarnapR. (1928). The Logical Structure of the World, transl. GeorgeR.Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.
5.
CavellM. (1998). In response to Owen Renik’s “The analyst’s subjectivity and the analyst’s objectivity.”International Journal of Psychoanalysis79:1195–1202.
6.
DatillioF.M.EdwardsD.J.H.FishmanD.B. (2010). Case studies within a mixed methods paradigm: Towards a resolution of the alienation between the researcher and practitioner in psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy47:427–441.
7.
EagleM.N. (1987). Theoretical and clinical shifts in psychoanalysis. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry57:175–185.
8.
EagleM.N.WolitzkyD.L. (2011). Systematic empirical research versus clinical case studies: A valid antagonism?Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association59:791–818.
9.
FreudS. (1912). The dynamics of transference. Standard Edition12:97–108.
10.
FriedmanM. (1999). Reconsidering Logical Positivism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
HannanC.LambertM.J.HarmonC.NielsenS.L.SmartD.W.ShimokawaK.SuttonS.W. (2005). A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. Journal of Clinical Psychology61:155–163.
12.
HoffmanI.Z. (2009). Doublethinking our way to “scientific legitimacy”: The desiccation of human experience. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association57:1043–1069.
13.
KächeleH.SchachterJ.ThomäH. (2009). From Psychoanalytic Narrative to Empirical Single Case Research. New York: Routledge.
14.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
15.
KazdinA.E. (2006). Arbitrary metrics: Implications for identifying evidence-based treatments. The American Psychologist61:42–49.
16.
LambertM. (2007). Presidential address: What we have learned from a decade of research aimed at improving psychotherapy outcome in routine care. Psychotherapy Research17:1–14.
17.
LingiardiV.GazzilloF.WaldronS. (2010). An empirically supported psychoanalysis: The case of Giovanna. Psychoanalytic Psychology27:190–218.
18.
LuborskyL. (1996). The Symptom-Context Method: Its Origins and Uses and Why Clinicians and Researchers Need It. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19.
Mayotte-BlumJ.Slavin-MulfordJ.LehmannM.PesaleF.Becker-MateroM.HilsenrothM. (2011). Therapeutic immediacy across long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: An evidence-based case study. Journal of Counseling Psychology. DOI:10.1037/a002608710.1037/a0026087.
20.
MeehlP.E. (1973). Why I do not attend case conferences. In Psychodiagnosis: Selected Papers, ed. MeehlP.E.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 225–302.
NagelT. (1986). The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
OkiishiJ.C.LambertM.J.NielsenS.L.OglesB.M (2003). In search of supershrink: Using patient outcome to identify effective and ineffective therapists. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy10:361–373.
24.
RickmanH.P. (1979). Wilhelm Dilthey: Pioneer of the Human Studies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
SafranJ.D. (in press). Double-thinking or dialectical thinking: A critical appreciation of Irwin Hoffman’s “Doublethinking” critique. Psychoanalytic Dialogues.
26.
SafranJ.D.MuranJ.C. (2000). Negotiating the Therapeutic Alliance: A Relational Treatment Guide. New York: Guilford Press.
27.
SpenceD.P. (1988). Tough and tender-minded hermeneutics. In Hermeneutics and Psychological Theory, ed. MesserS.B.SassL.A.WoolfolkR.L.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 62–84.
28.
StilesW.B. (2007). Theory-building studies of counselling and psychotherapy. Counselling & Psychotherapy Research7:122–127.
29.
StilesW.B. (2009). Logical operations in theory-building case studies. Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy5(3):9–22.
30.
WachtelP.L. (2010). Beyond “ESTs”: Problematic assumptions in the pursuit of evidence-based practice. Psychoanalytic Psychology27:251–272.
31.
WallersteinR.S. (1991). Assessment of structural change in psychoanalytic therapy and research. In The Concept of Structure in Psychoanalysis, ed. ShapiroT.Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
32.
WeissJ.SampsonH., & the Mount Zion Psychotherapy Research Group (1986). The Psychoanalytic Process: Theory, Clinical Observation, and Empirical Research. New York: Guilford Press.
33.
WestenD.BradleyR. (2005). Empirically supported complexity: Rethinking evidence-based practice in psychotherapy. Current Directions in Psychological Science14:266–271.
34.
WindelbandW. (1893). History of Philosophy, Vols. 1 & 2. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1958.