Is systematic quantitative research scientifically rigorous? Methodological and statistical considerations

Beebe B. (2005). Mother-infant research informs mother-infant treatment. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 60:7–46.

Beebe B. Lachmann F. (2009). The origins of 12-month attachment: A microanalysis of 4-month mother-infant interaction. Attachment & Human Development 12:6–141.

Cohen J. (1994). The earth is round (p <.05). The American Psychologist 49:997–1003.

Eagle M. Wolitzky D. (2011). Systematic empirical research versus clinical case studies: A valid antagonism? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 59:791–818.

Feyerabend P. (1978). Science in a Free Society. New York: Schocken Books.

Fonagy P. Roth A. Higgitt A. (2005). Psychodynamic psychotherapies: Evidence–based practice and clinical wisdom. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 69:1–58.

Hoffman I.Z. (2009). Doublethinking our way to “scientific” legitimacy: The desiccation of human experience. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 57:1043–1069.

Kuhn T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.

Madigan R. Johnson S. Linton P. (1995). The language of psychology: APA style as epistemology. The American Psychologist 60:428–436.

Meehl P. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 26:806–834.

Norcross J.C. Beutler L.E. Levant R.F. , eds. (2006). Evidence-Based Practices in Mental Health: Debate and Dialogue on the Fundamental Questions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Suppe F. , ed. (1977). The Structure of Scientific Theories. 2nd ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.