EagleM.N. (2003). The postmodern turn in psychoanalysis: A critique. Psychoanalytic Psychology20:411–424.
2.
EagleM.N.WolitzkyD.L. (2011). Systematic empirical research versus clinical case studies: A valid dichotomy?Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association59:791–817.
3.
FoucaultM. (1966). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Pantheon, 1971.
4.
GadamerH. (1975). Truth and Method. London: Continuum.
5.
GrünbaumA. (1984). The Foundations of Psychoanalysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
HabermasJ. (1972). Knowledge and Human Interests. New York: Beacon Books.
7.
HeideggerM. (1927). Being and Time. New York: Harper & Row, 1956.
8.
HoffmanI.Z. (2009). Doublethinking our way to “scientific legitimacy”: The desiccation of human experience. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association57:1043–1069.
9.
Merleau-PontyM. (1945). Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge, 1962.
10.
NagelT. (1986). The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
NussbaumM.C. (2010). Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
12.
RicouerP. (1981). Hermeneutics and the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
RyleG. (1947). The Concept of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
14.
SassL.A.WoolfolkR.L. (1988). Psychoanalysis and the hermeneutic turn: A critique of narrative truth and historical truth. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association36:429–454.
15.
SchaferR. (1983). The Analytic Attitude. New York: Basic Books.
16.
SpenceD.P. (1982). Narrative Truth and Historical Truth: Meaning and Interpretation in Psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.
17.
SpenceD.P. (1990). The rhetorical voice of psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association38:579–603.
18.
SpenceD.P. (1993). The hermeneutic turn: Soft science or loyal opposition?Psychoanalytic Dialogues3:1–10.
19.
WestenD. (2002). The language of psychoanalytic discourse. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12:857–898.
