Calls for more rigorous psychoanalytic studies have increased over the past decade. The field has been divided by those who assert that psychoanalysis is properly a hermeneutic endeavor and those who see it as a science. A comparable debate is found in research methodology, where qualitative and quantitative methods have often been seen as occupying orthogonal positions. Recently, Mixed Methods Research (MMR) has emerged as a viable “third community” of research, pursuing a pragmatic approach to research endeavors through integrating qualitative and quantitative procedures in a single study design. Mixed Methods Research designs and the terminology associated with this emerging approach are explained, after which the methodology is explored as a potential integrative approach to a psychoanalytic human science. Both qualitative and quantitative research methods are reviewed, as well as how they may be used in Mixed Methods Research to study complex human phenomena.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckermanS.HilsenrothM.KnowlesE. (2005). Ratings of therapist dynamic activities and alliance early and late in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training42:225–231.
2.
AronL. (2006). Analytic impasse and the third: Clinical implications of intersubjectivity theory. International Journal of Psychoanalysis87:349–368.
3.
BazeleyP. (2009). Editorial: Integrating data analyses in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research3:203–207.
4.
CampbellD.FiskeD. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin56:81–105.
5.
CartwrightD. (2004). The psychoanalytic research interview: Preliminary suggestions. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association52:209–242.
6.
CraigeH. (2002). Mourning analysis: The post-termination phase. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association50:507–550.
7.
CreswellJ.W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
ElkindS.N. (1992). Resolving Impasses in Therapeutic Relationships. New York: Guilford Press.
11.
EllisP.D. (2010). The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes: Statistical Power, Meta-analysis, and the Interpretation of Research Results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Eubanks-CarterC.MuranJ.C.SafranJ.D. (2010). Alliance ruptures and resolution. In The Therapeutic Alliance: An Evidence-Based Guide to Practice, ed. MuranJ.BarberJ.P.New York: Guilford Press, pp. 74–94.
13.
FalkenströmF.GrantJ.BrobergJ.SandellR. (2007). Self-analysis and post-termination improvement after psychoanalysis and long-term psychotherapy. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association55:629–674.
14.
FonagyP.TargetM. (2002). The history and current status of outcome research at the Anna Freud Centre. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child57:27–60.
15.
GeertzC. (1983). Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
16.
GeloO.BraakmannD.BenetkaG. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative research: Beyond the debate. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science42:266–290.
17.
GerberA.J.KocsisJ.H.MilrodB.RooseS.P. (2006). Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials of psychodynamic psychotherapy. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association54:1307–1313.
18.
GilliganC.SpencerR.WeinbergM.K.BertschT. (2003). On the Listening Guide: A voice-centered relational method. In Qualitative Research in Psychology: Expanding Perspectives in Methodology and Design, ed. CamicP.RhodesJ.YardleyL.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 157–172.
19.
GiorgiA. (2005). The phenomenological movement and research in the human sciences. Nursing Science Quarterly18:75–82.
20.
GiorgiA. (2008). Concerning a serious misunderstanding of the essence of the phenomenological method in psychology. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology39:33–58.
21.
GreeneJ.C. (2007). Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. San Francisco: Wiley.
22.
GrünbaumA. (1984). The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
HauserS.T. (2002). The future of psychoanalytic research: Turning points and new opportunities. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association50:395–405.
24.
HauserS.T. (2006). Studying psychoanalysis: Asking and answering the hard questions. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association54:561–569.
25.
HoffmanI.Z. (2009). Doublethinking our way to “scientific” legitimacy. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association57:1043–1069.
26.
HorvathA.GreenbergL. (1989). Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology36:223–233.
27.
JohnsonR.B.OnwuegbuzieA.J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher33:14–26.
28.
KernbergO.F. (2006). The pressing need to increase research in and on psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis87:919–926.
29.
KvaleS. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
30.
LandisJ.R.KochG.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics31:159–174.
31.
LuytenP.BlattS.J.CorveleynJ. (2006). Minding the gap between positivism and hermeneutics in psychoanalytic research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association54:571–610.
32.
MaysN.PopeC. (2000). Qualitative research in healthcare: Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal320:50–52.
33.
MishlerE.G. (1986). Research Interviewing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
34.
NewmanI.BenzC.R. (1998). Qualitative-Quantitative Research Methodology: Exploring the Interactive Continuum. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
35.
RosenwaldG. (1988). A theory of multiple-case research. Journal of Personality56:239–264.
36.
RuddenM.TwemlowS.AckermanS. (2008). Leadership and regressive group processes: A pilot study. International Journal of Psychoanalysis89:993–1010.
37.
SafranJ.MuranJ.SamstagL.WinstonA. (2005). Evaluating alliance-focused intervention for potential treatment failures: A feasibility study and descriptive analysis. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training42:512–531.
SmithJ.A.OsbornM. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 51–80.
40.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (2003). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
TillmanJ.G. (1999). Psychosis as the sickness unto death: Treatment impasse, consultation and resolution. American Journal of Psychoanalysis59:119–125.
43.
TillmanJ.G.OberwagerK.AgarK. (2010). Research publications in three psychoanalytic journals, 2001–2008. Poster presented at the American Psychoanalytic Association poster session, New York, January 15.
44.
von EckartsbergR. (1986). Life-World Experience: Existential-Phenomenological Research Approaches in Psychology. Washington, DC: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology / University Press of America.
45.
WallersteinR. (2009). What kind of research in psychoanalytic science?International Journal of Psychoanalysis90:109–133.
46.
WoolleyC.M. (2009). Meeting the mixed methods challenge of integration in a sociological study of structure and agency. Journal of Mixed Methods Research3:7–25.
