Defensive Projection,Superimposed On Simplistic Object Relations,Erodes Patient-Provider Relationships in High-Risk Pregnancy: an Empirical Investigation
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2010
Defensive Projection,Superimposed On Simplistic Object Relations,Erodes Patient-Provider Relationships in High-Risk Pregnancy: an Empirical Investigation
In an attempt to illustrate the relevance of psychoanalytic theory and research to behavior medicine, an empirical investigation was conducted of females treated at a high-risk pregnancy specialty clinic (N = 58). Drawing from psychoanalytic object relations theory, it was hypothesized and confirmed that use of projection as a defense mechanism during pregnancy, superimposed on simplistic object relations, predicted an erosion of patient-provider relationships during the pregnancy/postdelivery period. Findings are interpreted through the perspective of mentalization, pertaining to individuals’ ability to understand the mental states of self and others, specifically under significant stress. Implications for psychoanalytically oriented assessment and treatment, and for the rift between psychoanalysis and research, are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ackerman, S.J., Hilsenroth, M.J., Clemence, A.J., Weatherill, R., & Fowler, J.C. ( 2000). The effects of social cognition and object representation on psychotherapy continuation. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic64:386-408.
2.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. ( 1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions . Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications .
3.
Balsam, R.H. ( 1996). The pregnant mother and the body image of the daughter . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association44(Suppl.):401-427.
4.
Balsam, R.H. ( 2000). The mother within the mother. Psychoanalytic Quarterly69:465-493.
5.
Balsam, R.H. ( 2003). The vanished pregnant body in psychoanalytic female developmental theory. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association51:1153-1179.
6.
Basler, S.C., Grzesiak, R.C., & Dworkin, R.H. ( 2002). Integrating relational psychodynamic and action-oriented psychotherapies: Treating pain and suffering. In Psychological Approaches to Pain Management: A Practitioner’s Handbook, ed. D.C. Turk & R.J. Gatchel.New York: Guilford Press , pp. 94-127.
7.
Besser, A., Priel, B., & Wiznitzer, A. ( 2002). Childbearing depressive symptomatology in high-risk pregnancies: The roles of working models and social support. Personal Relationships9:395-413.
8.
Blass, R.B., & Carmeli, Z. ( 2007). The case against neuropsychoanalysis: On fallacies underlying psychoanalysis’ latest scientific trend and its negative impact on psychoanalytic discourse. International Journal of Psychoanalysis88:19-40.
9.
Blatt, S.J. ( 1974). Levels of object representations in anaclitic and introjective depression. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child24:107-157.
10.
Blatt, S.J., Auerbach, J.S., & Behrends, R.S. (2008). Changes in the representation of self and significant others in the treatment process: Links between representation, internalization, and mentalization. In Mind to Mind: Infant Research, Neuroscience, and Psychoanalysis, ed. E. Jurist, S. Berger, & A. Slade.New York: Other Press, pp. 225-263.
11.
Blatt, S.J., Auerbach, J.S., & Levy, K.N. ( 1997). Mental representations in personality development, psychopathology, and the therapeutic process. Review of General Psychology1:351-374.
12.
Blechner, M.J. ( 1999). Psychoanalytic approaches to the AIDS epidemic . In Psychoanalytic Therapy as Health Care: Effectiveness and Economics in the 21st Century, ed. K. Harriete , M.N. Eagle, & D.L. Wolitzky.Mahwah, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 199-220.
13.
Bornstein, R.F. ( 2001). The impending death of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology18:3-20.
14.
Brenner, C. ( 1973). An Elementary Textbook of Psychoanalysis. New York: International Universities Press .
15.
Cicchetti, D.V. ( 1994). Guidelines, criteria and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment6:284-290.
16.
Cicchetti, D.V., & Sparrow, S.S. ( 1981). Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior . American Journal of Mental Deficiency86:127-137.
17.
Condon, J.T. ( 1992). Medical litigation: The aetiological role of psychological and interpersonal factors. Medical Journal of Australia157:768-770.
18.
Cramer, P. ( 1987). The development of defense mechanisms. Journal of Personality55:597-614.
19.
Cramer, P. ( 1991). The Development of Defense Mechanisms: Theory, Research, and Assessment. New York: Springer .
20.
Cramer, P. ( 1997). Evidence for changes in children’s use of defense mechanisms. Journal of Personality65:233-247.
21.
Cramer, P. ( 1999). Personality, personality disorders, and defense mechanisms . Journal of Personality67:535-554.
22.
Cramer, P. ( 2000). Defense mechanisms in psychology today: Further processes for adaptation. American Psychologist55:637-646.
23.
Cramer, P. ( 2006). Defending the Self. New York : Guilford Press.
24.
Cramer, P., & Blatt, S.J. ( 1990). Use of the TAT to measure change in defense mechanisms following intensive psychotherapy. Journal of Personality Assessment54:236-251.
25.
Cramer, P., Blatt, S.J., & Ford, R.Q. ( 1988). Defense mechanisms in the anaclitic and introjective personality configuration. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology56:610-616.
26.
Davis, J. ( 1985). The Logic of Causal Order. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
27.
Eurelings-Bontekoe, E.N.H., Luyten, P., & Snellen, W. ( 2009). Validation of a theory-driven profile interpretation of the Dutch Short Form of the MMPI using the TAT Social Cognitions and Object Relations Scale (SCORS). Journal of Personality Assessment91:155-165.
28.
Field, N.P., Sturgeon, S.E., Puryear, R., Hibbard, S., & Horowitz, M.J. (2001). Object relations as a predictor of adjustment in conjugal bereavement. Development & Psychopathology13:399-412.
29.
Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. ( 2002). Affect Regulation, Mentalization, and the Development of the Self. New York: Other Press .
30.
Fonagy, P., & Luyten, P. ( 2009). A developmental, mentalization-based approach to the understanding and treatment of borderline personality disorder. Development & Psychopathology21:1355-1381.
31.
Ford, J.D., Fisher, P., & Larson, L. ( 1997). Object relations as a predictor of treatment outcome with chronic Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology65:547-559.
32.
Forray, A., Mayes, L.C., Magriples, U., & Epperson, C.N. (2009). Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder in pregnant women with prior pregnancy complications. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine22:522-527.
33.
Franche, R.L., & Mikail, S.F. ( 1999). The impact of perinatal loss on adjustment to subsequent pregnancy. Social Science & Medicine48:1613-1623.
34.
Frost, M., & Condon, J.T. ( 1996). The psychological sequelae of miscarriage: A critical review of the literature. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry30:54-62.
35.
Galassi, J.P., Schanberg, R., & Ware, W.B. ( 1992). The Patient Reactions Assessment: A brief measure of the quality of the patient-provider medical relationship. Psychological Assessment4:346-351.
36.
Garb, H.N. ( 1999). Call for a moratorium on the use of the Rorschach Inkblot Test in clinical and forensic settings. Assessment6:313-317.
37.
Hibbard, S., Hilsenroth, M.J., Hibbard, J.K., & Nash, M.R. ( 1995). A validity study of two object representations measures . Psychological Assessment7:432-439.
38.
Hilsenroth, M., Stein, M., & Pinsker, J. ( 2004). Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale: Global Rating Method (SCORS-G). Unpublished manuscript, Derner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies, Adelphi University.
39.
Hoffman, I.Z. ( 2009). Doublethinking our way to "scientific" legitimacy: The desiccation of human experience. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association57:1043-1069.
40.
Huprich, S.K., & Greenberg, R.P. (2003). Advances in the assessment of object relations in the 1990s. Clinical Psychology Review23:665-698.
41.
Kernberg, O.F. ( 1980). Neurosis, psychosis, and the borderline states . In Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry: Vol. 1, ed. H.I. Kaplan, A.M. Freedman, & B.J. Sadock. 3rd ed. Baltimore : Williams & Wilkins, pp. 1079-1092.
42.
Kernberg, O.F. ( 1981). Structural interviewing. Psychiatric Clinics of North America4:169-194.
43.
Kernberg, O.F. ( 2006). The pressing need to increase research in and on psychoanalysis . International Journal of Psychoanalysis87:919-926.
44.
Lerman, S.F., Shahar, G., Czarkowski, K.A., Kurshan, N., Magriples, U., Mayes, L.C., & Epperson, C.N. (2007). Predictors of satisfaction with obstetric care in high risk pregnancy: The importance of patient-provider relationships. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings14:330-334.
45.
Luyten, P., Blatt, S.J., & Corveleyn, J. ( 2006). Minding the gap between positivism and hermeneutics in psychoanalytic research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association54:571-610.
46.
Luyten, P., Fonagy, P., Mayes, L.C., Vermote, R., Lowyck, B., Bateman, A., & Target, M. ( 2009). Broadening the scope of the mentalization-based approach to psychopathology. Unpublished manuscript.
47.
Luyten, P., Vliegen, N., Van Houdenhove, B., & Blatt, S.J. ( 2008). Equifinality, multifinality, and the rediscovery of the importance of early experiences: Pathways from early adversity to psychiatric and (functional) somatic disorders. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child63:27-60.
48.
Morgan, C.D., & Murray, H.A. ( 1935). A method for investigating fantasies: The Thematic Apperception Test. Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry34:289-306.
49.
Obssr (2006). Healthier Lives through Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. Bethesda, MD: Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research , National Institutes of Health.
50.
Phillips, N., Dennerstein, L., & Farish, S. ( 1996). Psychological morbidity in obstetric-gynaecology patients: Testing the need for expanded psychiatry services in obstetric-gynaecology facilities. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry30:74-81.
51.
Pines, D. ( 1972). Pregnancy and motherhood: Interactions between fantasy and reality. British Journal of Medical Psychology45:333-343.
52.
Pines, D. ( 1982). The relevance of early psychic development to pregnancy and abortion. International Journal of Psychoanalysis63:311-319.
53.
Pines, D. ( 1990a). Emotional aspects of infertility and its remedies . International Journal of Psychoanalysis71:561-568.
54.
Pines, D. ( 1990b). Pregnancy, miscarriage and abortion: A psychoanalytical perspective. International Journal of Psychoanalysis71:301-307.
55.
Porcerelli, J.H., Cogan, R., Kamoo, R., & Miller, K. ( 2000). Convergent validity of the Defense Mechanisms Manual and the Defensive Functioning Scale. Unpublished manuscript.
56.
Porcerelli, J.H., & Hibbard, S. ( 2004). Projective assessment of defense mechanisms. In Comprehensive Handbook of Psychological Assessment: Vol. 2. Objective and Projective Assessment and Psychopathology , ed. M. Hilsenroth & D. Segal. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 466-475.
57.
Porcerelli, J.H., Shahar, G., Blatt, S.J., Ford, R.Q., Mezza, J.A., & Greenlee, L.M. (2006). Social cognition and object relations scale: Convergent validity and changes following intensive inpatient treatment. Journal of Personality & Individual Differences41:407-417.
58.
Porcerelli, J.H., Thomas, S., Hibbard, S., & Cogan, R. ( 1998). Defense mechanism development in children, adolescents, and late adolescents. Journal of Personality Assessment71:411-420.
59.
Priel, B., & Besser, A. ( 1999). Vulnerability to postpartum depressive symptomatology: Dependency, self-criticism and the moderating role of antenatal attachment . Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology18:240-253.
60.
Priel, B., & Besser, A. ( 2000a). Adult attachment styles, early relationships, antenatal attachment, and perceptions of infant temperament: A study of first-time mothers . Personal Relationships7:291-310.
61.
Priel, B., & Besser, A. ( 2000b). Dependency and self-criticism among first-time mothers: The roles of global and specific support. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology19:437-450.
62.
Priel, B., & Besser, A. ( 2001). Bridging the gap between attachment and object relations theories: A study of the transition to motherhood. British Journal of Medical Psychology74:85-100.
63.
Priel, B., & Besser, A. ( 2002). Perceptions of early relationships during the transition to motherhood: The mediating role of social support. Infant Mental Health Journal23:343-360.
64.
Richter, M.S., Parkes, C., & Chaw-Kant, J. ( 2007). Listening to the voices of the hospitalized high-risk ante partum patient. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecology, & Neonatal Nursing36:313-318.
65.
Schattner, E., Shahar, G., & Abu-Shakra, M. (2008). "I used to see lupus as a sort of creature": Chronic illness as an internal object. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry78:466-472.
66.
Schroeder, C. ( 1996). Women’s experience of bed rest in high-risk pregnancy . Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship28:253-258.
67.
Shahar, G., & Blatt, S.J. ( 2005). Benevolent interpersonal schemas facilitate therapeutic change: Further analysis of the Menninger Psychotherapy Research Project. Psychotherapy Research15:345-349.
68.
Westen, D. ( 1995). Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale: Q-sort for projective stories (SCORS-Q). Unpublished manuscript, Cambridge Hospital andHarvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA.
69.
Westen, D., Lohr, N., Silk, K.R., & Kerber, K. ( 1989). Measuring object relations and social cognition using the TAT: A scoring manual. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
70.
Westen, D., Lohr, N., Silk, K.R., Gold, L., & Kerber, K. ( 1990). Object relations and social cognition in borderlines, major depressives, and normals: A Thematic Apperception Test analysis. Psychological Assessment2:355-365.
71.
Yali, A.M., & Lobel, M. ( 1999). Coping and distress in pregnancy: An investigation of medically high risk women. Journal of Psychosomatic & Obstetrical Gynaecology20:39-52.
