There have been relatively few discussions of systematic studies of language, including neuroscience studies, in the psychoanalytic literature. To address this dearth, a detailed review of research on embodied language in neuroscience and related disciplines is presented, after which their findings are considered in light of diverse views of language in psychoanalysis, specifically the models of the Boston Change Process Study Group, Wilma Bucci, Fonagy and Target, David Olds, and Hans Loewald. The juxtaposition of psychoanalytic models with the findings of research on embodied language shows that scientific studies can focus psychoanalytic understanding of verbal processes, and that integrations with neuroscience neither inherently threaten the traditional psychoanalytic focus on verbal meanings nor reduce the richness and complexity of psychoanalytic theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aragno, A. ( 2008). The language of empathy: An analysis of its constitution, development, and role in psychoanalytic listening. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association56:713-740.
2.
Aziz-Zadeh, L., Wilson, S.M., Rizzolatti, G., & Iacoboni, M. ( 2006). Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions. Current Biology16:1818-1823.
3.
Barrett, L.F., Lindquist, K.A., & Gendron, M. ( 2007). Language as context for the perception of emotion . Trends in Cognitive Sciences11:327-332.
4.
Barsalou, L.A. ( 2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology59:617-645.
5.
Baumgaertner, A., Buccioni, G., Lange, R., Mcnamara, A., & Binkofski, F. ( 2007). Polymodal conceptual processing of human biological actions in the left inferior frontal lobe. European Journal of Neuroscience25: 881-889.
6.
Beutel, M.E., Stern, E., & Silbersweig, D.A. (2003). The emerging dialogue between psychoanalysis and neuroscience: Neuroimaging perspectives. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association51:773-801.
7.
Blass, R.B., & Carmeli, Z. ( 2007). The case against neuropsychoanalysis: On fallacies underlying psychoanalysis’ latest scientific trend and its negative impact on psychoanalytic discourse. International Journal of Psychoanalysis88:19-40.
8.
Bookheimer, S. ( 2002). Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience25:151-188.
9.
Borghi, A.M., Glenberg, A.M., & Kaschak, M.P. ( 2004). Putting words in perspective. Memory & Cognition32:863-873.
10.
Boston Change Process Study Group (2005). The "something more than interpretation" revisited: Sloppiness and co-creativity in the psychoanalytic encounter. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association53:693-729.
11.
Boston Change Process Study Group (2007). The foundational level of psychodynamic meaning: Implicit process in relation to conflict, defense and the dynamic unconscious. International Journal of Psychoanalysis88:843-860.
12.
Boston Change Process Study Group (2008). Forms of relational meaning: Issues in the relations between the implicit and reflective-verbal domains. Psychoanalytic Dialogues18:125-148.
13.
Boulenger, V., Roy, A.C., Paulignan, Y., Deprez, V., Jeannerod, M., & Nazir, T.A. ( 2006). Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 msec of processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience18:1607-1615.
14.
Bucci, W. ( 1997). Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Science: A Multiple Code Theory. New York: Guilford Press .
15.
Bucci, W. ( 2002). The referential process, consciousness, and the sense of self. Psychoanalytic Inquiry22:766-793.
16.
Bucci, W., & Maskit, B. ( 2007). Beneath the surface of the interaction: The psychoanalytic method in modern dress. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association55:1356-1397.
17.
Buccino, G., & Riggio, L. ( 2006). The role of the mirror neuron system in motor learning . Kinesiology38:5-15.
18.
Cimino, C., & Correale, A. ( 2005). Projective identification and consciousness alteration: A bridge between psychoanalysis and neuroscience? International Journal of Psychoanalysis86:51-60.
19.
Damasio, A. ( 1999). The Feeling of What Happens. New York : Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
20.
Damasio, H., Tranel, D., Grabowski, T., Adolphs, R., & Damasio, A. ( 2004). Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval . Cognition92:179-229.
21.
Evans, H.M. ( 2008). The action in therapeutic action: Nonverbal interventions . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association56:565-572.
22.
Feldman, J., & Narayanan, S. ( 2004). Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language . Brain & Language89:385-392.
23.
Fischer, M.H., & Zwaan, R.A. ( 2008). Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology61:825-850.
24.
Fodor, J. ( 1975). The Language of Thought. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
25.
Fonagy, P., Gergeley, G., & Target, M. ( 2007). The parent-infant dyad and the construction of the subjective self. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry48:288-328.
26.
Fonagy, P., & Target, M. ( 2007). The rooting of the mind in the body: New links between attachment theory and psychoanalytic thought. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association55:411-456.
27.
Freud, S. ( 1891). On Aphasia. A Critical Study. New York: International Universities Press, 1953.
28.
Gallese, V. ( 2001). The "shared manifold" hypothesis: From mirror neurons to empathy. Journal of Consciousness Studies8:33-50.
29.
Gallese, V., Eagle, M.N., & Migone, P. ( 2007). Intentional attunement: Mirror neurons and the neural underpinnings of interpersonal relations. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association55:131-176.
30.
Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain119:593-609.
31.
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. ( 2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology22: 455-479.
32.
Ghio, M., & Tettamanti, M. (in press). Semantic domain-specific functional integration for action-related vs. abstract concepts. Brain & Language.
33.
Gibbs, R.W. ( 2006). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation . Mind & Language21:434-458.
34.
Ginot, E. ( 2007). Intersubjectivity and neuroscience: Understanding enactments and their therapeutic significance within emerging paradigms. Psychoanalytic Psychology24:317-332.
35.
Glenberg, A.M., & Kaschak, M.P. ( 2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review9:558-565.
36.
Glenberg, A.M., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Riggio, L., Palumbo, D., & Buccino, G. ( 2008). Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity . Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology61:905-919.
37.
Hauk, O., Davis, M.H., Kherif, F., & Pulvermüller, F. (2008). Imagery or meaning? Evidence for a semantic origin of category-specific brain activity in metabolic imaging . European Journal of Neuroscience27: 1856-1866.
38.
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron41:301-307.
39.
Havas, D.A., Glenberg, A.M., & Rinck, M. ( 2007). Emotion simulation during language comprehension . Psychonomic Bulletin & Review14:436-441.
40.
Isenberg, N., Silbersweig, D., Engelien, A., Emmerich, S., Malavade, K., Beattie, B., Leon, A.C., & Stern, E. ( 1999). Linguistic threat activates the human amygdala . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences96:10456-10459.
41.
Kemmerer, D., Castillo, J.G., Talavage, T., Patterson, S., & Wiley, C. ( 2008). Neuroanatomical distribution of five semantic components of verbs: Evidence from fMRI. Brain & Language107:16-43.
42.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. ( 1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
43.
Lieberman, M.D., Eisenberger, N.I., Crockett, M.J., Tom, S.M., Pfeifer, J.H., & Way, B.M. ( 2007). Putting feelings into words: Affect labeling disrupts amygdala activity in response to affective stimuli. Psychological Science18:421-428.
44.
Loewald, H.W. ( 1978). Primary process, secondary process, and language . In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven : Yale University Press, 1980, pp. 178-206.
45.
Martin, A. ( 2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain . Annual Review of Psychology58:25-45.
46.
Matlock, T. ( 2004). Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory & Cognition32:1389-1400.
47.
Niedenthal, P.M., Barsalou, L.W., Ric, F., & Krauth-Gruber, S. (2005). Embodiment in the acquisition and use of emotion knowledge. In Emotion and Consciousness , ed. L.F. Barrett, P.M. Niedenthal, & P. Winkielman.New York: Guilford Press, pp. 21-50.
48.
Niedenthal, P.M., Winkielman, P., Mondillon, L., & Vermeulen, N. ( 2009). Embodiment of emotion concepts. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology96:1120-1136.
49.
Olds, D.D. ( 2000). A semiotic model of mind. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association48:497-529.
50.
Olds, D.D. ( 2006). Interdisciplinary studies and our practice. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association54:857-876.
51.
Pally, R. ( 2001). A primary role for nonverbal communication in psychoanalysis . Psychoanalytic Inquiry21:71-93.
52.
Papeo, L., Vallesi, A., Isaja, A., & Rumiati, R.I. ( 2009). Effects of TMS on different stages of motor and non-motor verb processing in the primary motor cortex. PLoS ONE4(2):1-11.
53.
Price, C.J. ( 2000). The anatomy of language: contributions from functional neuroimaging. Journal of Anatomy197:335-359.
54.
Pulver, S. ( 2003). The astonishing clinical irrelevance of neuroscience . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association51:755-772.
55.
Pulvermüller, F. ( 2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews of Neuroscience6:576-582.
56.
Rapp, A.M., Leube, D.T., Erb, M., Grodd, W., & Kircher, T.T. ( 2004). Neural correlates of metaphor processing. Cognitive Brain Research20:395-402.
57.
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. ( 2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience27:169-192.
58.
Rubino, V., Blasi, G., Latorre, V., Fazio, L., D’Errico, I., Mazzola, V., ET AL. (2007). Activity in medial prefrontal cortex during cognitive evaluation of threatening stimuli as a function of personality style . Brain Research Bulletin74:250-257.
59.
Rüschemeyer, S.A., Brass, M., & Friederici, A.D. (2007). Comprehending prehending: Neural correlates of processing verbs with motor stems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience19:855-865.
60.
Shapiro, T. ( 2004). Use your words!Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association52:331-353.
61.
Siegel, D.J. ( 2006). An interpersonal neurobiology approach to psychotherapy: Awareness, mirror neurons, and neural plasticity in the development of well-being . Psychiatric Annals36:248-256.
62.
Smith, L., & Glasser, M. ( 2005). The development of embodied cognition: Six lessons from babies. Artificial Life11:13-29.
63.
Stern, D.N. ( 1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York : Basic Books.
64.
Stern, D.N. ( 2004). The Present Moment in Psychotherapy and Everyday Life . New York: Norton.
Tabibnia, G., Lieberman, M.D., & Craske, M.G. ( 2008).The lasting effect of words on feelings: Words may facilitate exposure effects to threatening images. Emotion8:307-317.
67.
Taylor, L.J., & Zwaan, R.A. ( 2008). Motor resonance and linguistic focus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology61:896-904.
68.
Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M.C., Gallese, V., Danna, M., Scifo, P., ET AL. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience17: 273-281.
69.
Tomasino, B., Fink, G.R., Sparing, R., Dafotakis, M., & Weiss, P.H. ( 2008). Action verbs and the primary motor cortex: A comparative TMS study of silent reading, frequency judgments, and motor imagery. Neuropsychologia46:1915-1926.
70.
Tranel, D., Kemmerer, D., Adolphs, R., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A.R. ( 2003). Neural correlates of conceptual knowledge for actions . Cognitive Neuropsychology20:409-432.
71.
Vigliocco, G., Warren, J., Siri, S., Arciuli, J., Scott, S., & Wise, R. ( 2006). The role of semantics and grammatical class in the neural representation of words. Cerebral Cortex16:1790-1796.
72.
Vivona, J.M. ( 2006). From developmental metaphor to developmental model: The shrinking role of language in the talking cure. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association54:877-902.
73.
Vivona, J.M. ( 2009). Leaping from brain to mind: A critique of mirror neuron explanations of countertransference. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association57:525-550.
74.
Westen, D., & Gabbard, G.O. ( 2002a). Developments in cognitive neuroscience: I. Conflict, compromise, and connectionism. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association50:53-98.
75.
Westen, D., & Gabbard, G.O. ( 2002b). Developments in cognitive neuroscience: II. Implications for theories of transference. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association50:99-134.
76.
Willems, R.M., & Hagoort, P. ( 2007). Neural evidence for the interplay between language, gesture, and action: A review. Brain & Language101:278-289.
77.
Wilson, M. ( 2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review9:625-636.
78.
Zwaan, R.A., & Taylor, L.J. ( 2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General135:1-11.
