This essay explores the possibility of an alternative hypothesis to the prevailing psychoanalytic instinctual drive theory whose theoretical and clinical validity has been variously critiqued and challenged. Arguments are suggested in support of the concept of motive as a viable alternative theory to the drive theory and as a replacement for the traditional instinctual drive model. Issues discussed include the understanding of the mind—body relation, the meaning of psychic determinism and overdetermination, the opposition of drive vs. motive (and the related distinction of cause vs. motive), the meaning of psychic energy, and the difference between the concept of drives as the source of all mental energy and the concept of personal agency. The discussion concludes with some observations on the clinical implications of these concepts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Akhtar, S. ( 1999). The distinction between needs and wishes: Implications for psychoanalytic theory and technique. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association47:113-151.
2.
Andreasen, N.C. ( 2001). Brave New Brain: Conquering Mental Illness in the Era of the Genome. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Arlow, J.A. ( 1959). Psychoanalysis as scientific method. In Psychoanalysis, Scientific Method, and Philosophy, ed. S. Hook.New York: New York University Press, pp. 201-211.
4.
Bateson, G. ( 1972). Steps toward an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine Books.
5.
Boesky, D. ( 2007). "The principle of multiple function": Revisiting a classic seventy-five years later. Psychoanalytic Quarterly76:93-117.
6.
Breuer, J., & Freud, S. ( 1895). Studies on hysteria. Standard Edition 2.
7.
Cohen, D.J. ( 2001). Desire and fantasy: A psychoanalytic perspective on theory of mind and autism. In Life Is with Others: Selected Writings on Child Psychiatry, ed. A. Martin & R.A. King.New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006, pp. 49-64.
8.
Damasio, A.R. ( 1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam.
9.
Damasio, A.R. ( 1999). The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. San Diego: Harcourt Brace.
10.
Feffer, M. ( 1982). The Structure of Freudian Thought: The Problem of Immutability and Discontinuity in Developmental Theory. New York: International Universities Press.
11.
Fisher, A.L. ( 1961). Freud and the image of man. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association35:45-77.
12.
Fonagy, P., Target, M., Gergely, G., Allen, J.G., & Bateman, A.W. ( 2003). The developmental roots of borderline personality disorder in early attachment relationships: A theory and some evidence. Psychoanalytic Inquiry23:412-459.
13.
Freud, S. ( 1891). On Aphasia. New York: International Universities Press.
14.
Freud, S. ( 1900). The interpretation of dreams. Standard Edition 4/5.
15.
Freud, S. ( 1905). Fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria. Standard Edition7:1-122.
16.
Friedman, L. ( 2007). Respecting the unity of mind: Waelder’s 1936 multiple function paper. Psychoanalytic Quarterly76:119-148.
17.
Gabbard, G.O. ( 2007). "Bound in a nutshell": Thoughts on complexity, reductionism, and "infinite space." International Journal of Psychoanalysis88:559-574.
18.
Goodman, G. ( 2002). The Internal World and Attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
19.
Green, A. ( 1999). The Fabric of Affect in the Psychoanalytic Discourse . London: Routledge.
20.
Green, A. ( 2001). Life Narcissism, Death Narcissism. New York: Free Association Books.
21.
Greenberg, J.R., & Mitchell, S.A. (1983). Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
22.
Grossman, W.I. ( 1992). Hierarchies, boundaries, and representation in the Freudian model of mental organization. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association40:27-62.
23.
Gurevich, H. ( 2008). The language of absence. International Journal of Psychoanalysis89:561-578.
24.
Holt, R.R. ( 1972). Freud’s mechanistic and humanistic images of man . Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Science1:3-24.
25.
Holt, R.R. ( 1976). Drive or wish? A reconsideration of the psychoanalytic theory of motivation. In Psychology versus Metapsychology: Psychoanalytic Essays in Memory of George S. Klein, ed. M. Gill & P.S. Holzman.Psychological Issues Monograph 36. New York: International Universities Press, pp. 158-197.
26.
Home, H.J. ( 1966). The concept of mind. International Journal of Psychoanalysis47:42-49.
27.
Hyman, M. ( 1975). In defense of libido theory. Annual of Psychoanalysis3:21-36.
28.
Kandel, E.R. ( 1998). A new intellectual framework for psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry155:457-469.
29.
Kandel, E.R. ( 1999). Biology and the future of psychoanalysis: A new intellectual framework for psychiatry revisited. American Journal of Psychiatry156:505-524.
30.
Klein, G.S. ( 1976). Freud’s two theories of sexuality. In Psychology versus Metapsychology: Psychoanalytic Essays in Memory of George S. Klein, ed. M. Gill & P.S. Holzman.Psychological Issues Monograph 36. New York: International Universities Press, pp. 14-70.
31.
Lacan, J. ( 1977). Écrits: A Selection. New York : Norton.
32.
Lichtenberg, J. ( 1989). Psychoanalysis and Motivation. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
33.
Loewald, H.W. ( 1971). On motivation and instinct theory. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980, pp. 102-137.
34.
Mayes, L.C., & Cohen, D.J. ( 1995). Constitution. In Psychoanalysis: The Major Concepts, ed. B.E. Moore & B.D. Fine.New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 271-292.
35.
Meissner S.J., W.W. (1981). Metapsychology-who needs it? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association29:921-938.
36.
Meissner S.J., W.W. (1989). A note on psychoanalytic facts. Psychoanalytic Inquiry9:193-219.
37.
Meissner S.J., W.W. (1991). What Is Effective in Psychoanalytic Therapy? The Move From Interpretation to Relation. Northvale, NJ : Aronson.
Meissner S.J., W.W. (1995a). The economic principle in psychoanalysis: I. Economics and energetics. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought18:197-226.
40.
Meissner S.J., W.W. (1995b). The economic principle in psychoanalysis: II. Regulatory principles. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought18:227-259.
41.
Meissner S.J., W.W. (1995c). The economic principle in psychoanalysis: III. Motivational principles. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought18:261-292.
42.
Meissner S.J., W.W. (1997). The self and the body: I. The body self and the body image. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought20:419-448.
43.
Meissner S.J., W.W. (1999a). The dynamic principle in psychoanalysis: I. The classic theory reconsidered. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought22:3-40.
44.
Meissner S.J., W.W. (1999b). The dynamic principle in psychoanalysis: II. Toward a revised theory of motivation. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought22:41-83.
45.
Meissner S.J., W.W. (1999c). The self-as-subject in psychoanalysis: I. The nature of subjectivity. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought22:155-201.
46.
Meissner S.J., W.W. (1999d). The self-as-subject in psychoanalysis: II. The subject in analysis. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought22:383-428.
47.
MeissnerS.J., W.W. ( 2001). The self-as-person in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought23:479-523.
48.
Meissner S.J., W.W. (2003a). The Ethical Dimension of Psychoanalysis-A Dialogue. Albany: SUNY Press.
49.
Meissner S.J., W.W. (2003b). Mind, brain, and self in psychoanalysis: I. Problems and attempted solutions. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought26: 279-320.
50.
Meissner S.J., W.W. (2003c). Mind, brain, and self in psychoanalysis: II. Freud and the mind-body relation. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought26: 321-344.
51.
Meissner S.J., W.W. (2003d). Mind, brain, and self in psychoanalysis: III. Psychoanalytic perspectives after Freud. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought26:345-386.
52.
Meissner S.J., W.W. (2006a). The mind-brain relation and neuroscientific foundations: I. The problem and neuroscientific approaches. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic70:87-101.
53.
Meissner S.J., W.W. (2006b). The mind-brain relation and neuroscientific foundations: II. Neurobehavioral integrations. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic70: 102-124.
54.
Meissner S.J., W.W. (2006c). The mind-brain relation and neuroscientific foundations: III. Brain and psychopathology, the split brain, and dreaming . Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic70:179-201.
55.
Meissner S.J., W.W. (2006d). Psychoanalysis and the mind-body relation: Psychosomatic perspectives. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic70:295-315.
56.
Meissner S.J., W.W. (2007). Mind, brain and self in psychoanalysis: Therapeutic implications of the mind-body relation. Psychoanalytic Psychology24: 333-354.
57.
MeissnerS.J., W.W. ( 2008). Narcissism as motive. Psychoanalytic Quarterly77:755-798.
58.
MeissnerS.J., W.W. ( 2009). Mind-brain and body in the self: Psychoanalytic perspectives . Psychoanalytic Review96:369-402.
59.
Modell, A.H. ( 1993). The Private Self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
Muller, J.P., & Richardson, W.J. (1982). Lacan and Language: A Reader’s Guide to Écrits. New York: International Universities Press.
61.
Opatow, B. ( 1993). On the drive-rootedness of psychoanalytic ego psychology . International Journal of Psychoanalysis74:437-457.
62.
Person, E.S. ( 2005). As the wheel turns: A centennial reflection on Freud’s Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association53:1257-1282.
63.
Pine, F. ( 1988). The four psychologies of psychoanalysis and their place in clinical work. In Contemporary Psychoanalysis in America: Leading Analysts Present Their Work, ed. A.M. Cooper.Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2006, pp. 493-513.
64.
Pine, F. ( 2005). Theories of motivation in psychoanalysis. In Textbook of Psychoanalysis, ed. E.S. Person , A.M. Cooper, & G.O. Gabbard.Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, pp. 3-19.
65.
Rizzuto, A.-M., Meissner S.J., W.W., & Buie, D.H. (2004). The Dynamics of Human Aggression: Theoretical Foundations, Clinical Applications. New York : Brunner-Routledge.
66.
Rubovits-Seitz, P.F.D. ( 1998). Depth-Psychological Understanding: The Methodologic Grounding of Clinical Interpretations. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
67.
Sandler, J. ( 1981). Unconscious wishes and human relationships. Contemporary Psychoanalysis17:180-196.
68.
Schafer, R. ( 1976). A New Language for Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press.
69.
Sherwood, M. ( 1969). The Logic of Explanation in Psychoanalysis. New York: Academic Press.
70.
Smith, H.F. ( 2005). Dialogues in conflict: Toward an integration of methods . Psychoanalytic Quarterly74:327-363.
71.
Stern, D.N. ( 1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View From Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York: Basic Books.
72.
Taylor, R. ( 1972). Causation. In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy , ed. P. Edwards. Vol. 2. New York: Macmillan, pp. 56-66.
73.
Waelder, R. ( 1936). The principle of multiple function: Observations on over-determination . Psychoanalytic Quarterly5:45-62.
74.
Wallace, E.R. ( 1985). Historiography and Causation in Psychoanalysis: An Essay on Psychoanalytic and Historical Epistemology. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
75.
Winnicott, D.W. ( 1963). Fear of breakdown. In Psychoanalytic Explorations , ed. C. Winnicott, R. Shepherd, & M. Davis.Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989, pp. 87-95.
