Why We Recommend Analytic Treatment for Some Patients and Not for Others

Abstract

One hundred consecutive patients applying for analysis completed a comprehensive battery of structured interviews and self-report questionnaires assessing dimensions of psychopathology and psychological functions that analysts consider important when evaluating patients for analysis. Patients were evaluated for analysis by a candidate supervised by a training analyst. Fifty patients were accepted for analysis and fifty rejected. In both groups, psychiatric morbidity and psychosocial impairment were high, with a 50% current and 74% lifetime diagnosis of mood disorder, 56% current and 61% lifetime history of anxiety disorder. The mean Beck Depression Inventory score fell in the moderate range, 19.1 (SD = 11.0), mean Hamilton Depression score in the mild range, 14.1 (SD = 7.8), and the mean Hamilton Anxiety score in the moderate range, 14.6 ( SD = 8.1), with 57% meeting criteria for an Axis II diagnosis, and mean social adjustment in the moderate to high pathology range. Patients accepted and rejected for analysis did not differ with regard to any of these dimensions. Accepted patients scored lower on measures of impulsivity, aggression, and sociopathy, and on scores of personality rigidity, primitive defenses, and outward aggression. The major finding was the striking similarity between patients accepted and rejected for psychoanalytic treatment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bachrach, H. (1993). The Columbia Records Project and the evolution of psychoanalytic outcome research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 41(Suppl.):279-297.

Baron, R.M. , & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 51:1173-1182.

Erle, J.B. (1979). An approach to the study of analyzability and analyses: The course of forty consecutive cases selected for supervised analysis . Psychoanalytic Quarterly 48:198-228.

Galatzer-Levy, R. , Bachrach, H. , Waldron, S. , & Skolnikoff, A. (2000). Does Psychoanalysis Work? New Haven: Yale University Press .

Kantrowitz, J.L. (1993). Outcome research in psychoanalysis: Review and reconsiderations. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 41(Suppl.):313-329.

Kernberg, O.F. (1999). Psychoanalysis, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, and supportive psychotherapy: Contemporary controversies. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 80:1075-1091.

Rothstein, A. (1994). A perspective on doing a consultation and making the recommendation of analysis to a prospective analysand. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 63:680-695.

Wallerstein, R. (1994). Psychotherapy research and its implications for a theory of therapeutic change: A forty-year overview. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 49:120-141.

--- ( 2000). Forty-two Lives in Treatment: A Study of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press.

10.

Weissman, M. , Klerman, G. , Paykel, E. , Prusoff, B. , & Hanson, B. (1978). Social adjustment by self-report in a community sample and in psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease 166:317-326.