Understanding how and why analysands make the choices they do is central to both the clinical and the theoretical projects of psychoanalysis. And yet we know very little about the process of choice or about the relationship between choices and motives. A striking parallel is to be found between the ways choice is narrated in ancient Greek texts and the experience of analysts as they observe patients making choices in everyday clinical work. Pursuing this convergence of classical and contemporary sensibilities will illuminate crucial elements of the various meanings of choice, and of the way that these meanings change over the course of psychoanalytic treatment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Dodds, E.R. (1951). The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
--- ( 1966). On misunderstanding the Oedipus Rex. In Oxford Readings in Greek Tragedy, ed. E. Segal.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983, pp. 177-188.
3.
Laplanche, J. (1992). Seduction, Translation, Drives, a Dossier. ICA Documents, 11.
4.
--- ( 1999). Essays on Otherness. London: Routledge.
5.
Lattimore, R. (1953). Introduction to The Oresteia. In The Complete Greek Tragedies: Vol. 1. Aeschylus, ed. D. Grene and R. Lattimore.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1-31.
6.
Lombardo, S., Transl (2000). Homer's The Odyssey. Indianapolis: Hackett.
7.
Hornblower, S., & Spawforth, A., EDS. (2003). The Oxford Classical Dictionary . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
8.
Rangell, L. (1981). From insight to change. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association29:119-141.
9.
Schafer, R. (2007). The reality principle, tragic knots, and the analytic process. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association55:1151-1168.
10.
Vernant, J.-P. (1990). Tensions and ambiguities in Greek tragedy. In Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece, ed. J.P. Vernant & P. Vidal-Naquet.New York: Zone Books, pp. 29-48.
