All talking therapies profit from a patient's deliberate work in treatment, for a number of reasons, each of which deserves separate study and reflection. This is as true for psychoanalysis as for other psychotherapies. But in psychoanalysis the idea of a patient's deliberate work is paradoxical and problematic, bringing special overt and covert benefits, but also risking countertransference hazards like those associated with the notion of therapeutic alliance. Many analysts today use the implicit idea of a patient's proper, deliberate work as a contrast in defining an enactment, and the idea of this proper work serves both parties as an image of aspiration when they are trying to climb out of an enactment. As always in these matters, that sort of usefulness carries the hazard of unrealistic and unpsychoanalytic expectations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Damasio, A. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. San Diego: Harcourt Brace.
2.
Fliess, R. (1942). The metapsychology of the analyst. Psychoanalytic Quarterly11:211-227.
3.
Fonagy, P. (1991). Thinking about thinking: Some clinical and theoretical considerations in the treatment of a borderline patient. International Journal of Psychoanalysis72:1-18.
4.
Freud, S. (1912). The dynamics of transference. Standard Edition12:97-108.
5.
--- ( 1914). Remembering, repeating and working-through. Standard Edition12:147-156.
6.
Friedman, L. (1969). The therapeutic alliance. International Journal of Psychoanalysis50:139-153.
7.
--- ( 1973). How real is the realistic ego in psychotherapy? Archives of General Psychiatry28:377-383.
8.
--- ( 1991). A reading of Freud's Papers on Technique. Psychoanalytic Quarterly60:564-595.
9.
--- ( 2002). Symbolizing as abstraction: Its role in psychoanalytic treatment. In Symbolizing and Desymbolizing: Essays in Honor of Norbert Freedman, ed. R. Lasky.New York: Karnac Books, pp. 204-230.
10.
--- ( 2005). Flirting with virtual reality. Psychoanalytic Quarterly74: 639-660.
11.
--- ( 2007). The delicate balance of work and illusion in psychoanalysis . Psychoanalytic Quarterly76:817-833.
12.
--- (in press). A renaissance of Freud's Papers on Technique. Psychoanalytic Quarterly.
13.
Gazzaniga, M. (1998). The Mind's Past. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
Gergeley, G., & Watson, J.S. (1996). The social biofeedback theory of parental affect-mirroring: The development of emotional self-awareness and self-control in infancy. International Journal of Psychoanalysis77:1181-1212.
15.
Gray, P. (2005). The Ego and Analysis of Defense. 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: Aronson.
16.
Greenson, R. (1965). The working alliance and the transference neurosis . Psychoanalytic Quarterly34:155-181.
17.
Hartmann, H. (1939). Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation. New York: International Universities Press, 1958.
18.
--- ( 1950). Comments on the psychoanalytic theory of the ego. In Essays on Ego Psychology: Selected Problems in Psychoanalytic Theory . New York: International Universities Press, pp. 113-141, 1964.
19.
Hendrick, I. (1943). Work and the pleasure principle. Psychoanalytic Quarterly12:311-329.
20.
Kant, I. (1793). Critique of the Power of Judgment, ed. P. Guyer.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
21.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1994). Precis of Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. Behavioral & Brain Sciences17:693-745.
22.
Klein, G. (1976). Psychoanalytic Theory: An Exploration of Essentials . New York: International Universities Press.
23.
Lane, R. (2000). Neural correlates of conscious emotional experience . In Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion, ed. R. Lane & L. Nadel.New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 345-370.
24.
Ledoux, J. (2000). Cognitive-emotional interactions: Listen to the brain. In Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion, ed. R. Lane & L. Nadel.New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 129-155.
25.
Levenson, E.A. (1972). The Fallacy of Understanding. New York: Basic Books.
26.
Libet, B. (1985). Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. Behavioral & Brain Sciences8:529-539.
27.
Loewald, H. (1961). Superego and time. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980, pp. 43-52.
28.
--- ( 1976). Primary process, secondary process, and language. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980, pp. 178-205.
29.
Nellison, K., Luppino, G., Van Duffel, W., ET AL. (2005). Observing others: Multiple action representation in the frontal lobe. Science310:332-336.
30.
Nunberg, H. (1930). The synthetic function of the ego In Practice and Theory of Psychoanalysis. New York: International Universities Press, 1960.
31.
Panksepp, J. (1999). Emotions as viewed by psychoanalysis and neuroscience: An exercise in consilience. Neuro-Psychoanalysis1:15-38.
32.
Renik, O. (1999). Playing one's cards face up in analysis: An approach to the problem of self-disclosure. Psychoanalytic Quarterly68:521-539.
33.
Schafer, R. (1983). The Analytic Attitude. New York: Basic Books.
34.
Schur, M. (1966). The Id and the Regulatory Principles of Mental Functioning. New York: International Universities Press.
35.
Smith, H.F. (2004). The analyst's fantasy of the ideal patient. Psychoanalytic Quarterly73:627-658.
36.
--- ( 2006). Analyzing disavowed action: The fundamental resistance of analysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association54:713-737.
37.
Waelder, R. (1936). The principle of multiple function: Observations on overdetermination. Psychoanalytic Quarterly5:45-62.
38.
White, R. (1963). Ego and Reality in Psychoanalytic Theory: A Proposal Regarding Independent Ego Energies. Psychological Issues Mongraph 11. New York: International Universities Press.
39.
Winnicott, D.W. (1972). Fragment of an analysis. In Tactics and Techniques in Psychoanalytic Therapy, ed. P.L Giovacchini.New York: Science House, pp. 455-693.
40.
Zetzel, E. (1958). Therapeutic alliance in the analysis of hysteria . In The Capacity for Emotional Growth, ed. E. Zetzel.New York: International Universities Press, 1970, pp. 182-196.
41.
--- ( 1966). The analytic situation. In Psychoanalysis in America, ed. R.E. Litman.New York: International Universities Press.
