The implications of an ethical dimension in psychoanalysis are explored, together with the questions whether and in what sense analysis has anything to contribute to ethical reflection, and whether and in what sense ethical considerations can play a role in analytic theory and process. As regards theory, analytic construction of an ethical agent would require a refocusing of structural and dynamic considerations in order to provide an integrative source of decision-making capacity to serve as the responsible agent in ethical deliberation, choice, and action. Suggestions are made for formulating the nature of the ethical agent in terms of a theory of motivation rather than of drive, and in terms of an integrative theory of the self. To the extent that analysis involves ethical considerations, the way lies open for dialogue and mutually enriching contributions of analysis to ethics and vice versa. Various aspects of the analytic perspective are explored that in themselves carry ethical implications or can be enriched by ethical reflection. Beyond theoretical considerations, the interaction between ethical factors and genetic, structural, and dynamic issues in clinical psychoanalysis loom as matters for future exploration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bowman, M.R. (1996). On the idea of natural science as a resistance to psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought19:371—402.
2.
Brown, H. (1977). Theory, Perception, and Commitments: The New Philosophy of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Erikson, E.H. (1975). Life History and the Historical Moment. New York: Norton.
4.
Fonagy, P. (2003). Some complexities in the relationship of psychoanalytic theory to technique. Psychoanalytic Quarterly72:13—47.
5.
Furer, M. (1972). The history of the superego concept in psychoanalysis: A review of the literature. In Moral Values and the Superego Concept in Psychoanalysis, ed. S.C. Post.New York: International Universities Press, pp. 11—62.
6.
Greifinger, J. (1997). On the horizon of authenticity: Toward a moral account of psychoanalytic therapy. In Soul on the Couch: Spirituality, Religion, and Morality in Contemporary Psychoanalysis, ed. C. Spezzano & G.J. Gargiulo.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press , pp. 201—230.
7.
Grünbaum, A. (1993). Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis: A Study in the Philosophy of Psychoanalysis. Madison, CT : International Universities Press.
8.
Hartmann, H. (1960). Moral Values in Psychoanalysis. New York: International Universities Press.
9.
Hesse, M. (1980). Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
10.
Hospers, J. (1950). Free will and psychoanalysis. In Readings in Ethical Theory, ed. W. Sellars & J. Hospers.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 560—575.
11.
Jones, S.L. (1994). A constructive relationship with the science and profession of psychology: Perhaps the boldest model yet. American Psychologist49:184—199.
12.
Kaplan, A. (1957). Freud and modern philosophy. In Freud and the Twentieth Century, ed. B. Nelson.New York: Meridian Books, pp. 209—223.
13.
Kohut, H. (1971). The Analysis of the Self. New York: International Universities Press.
14.
——— (1977). The Restoration of the Self. New York: International Universities Press.
15.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Laudan, L. (1984). Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
Lichtenberg, J.D., Lachmann, F.M., & Fosshage, J.L. (2002). A Spirit of Inquiry: Communication in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
18.
May, R. ( 1969). Love and Will. New York: Norton.
19.
Meehl, P. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisk: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology46:806—834.
20.
Meissner, W.W. (1979a). Critique of concepts and therapy in the action language approach to psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis60:291—310.
21.
——— (1979b). Methodological critique of the action language in psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association27:79—105.
22.
——— (1985). Psychoanalysis: The dilemma of science and humanism . Psychoanalytic Inquiry5:471—498.
23.
——— (1986). Can psychoanalysis find its self?Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association34:379—400.
24.
——— (1993). Self-as-agent in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought16:459—495.
25.
——— (1995a). The economic principle in psychoanalysis: I. Economics and energetics. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought18:197—226.
26.
——— (1995b). The economic principle in psychoanalysis: II. Regulatory principles. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought18:227—259.
27.
——— (1995c). The economic principle in psychoanalysis: III. Motivational principles. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought18:261—292.
28.
——— (1996). The self-as-object in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought19:425—459.
29.
——— (1997). The self and the body: I. The body self and the body image. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought20:419—448.
30.
——— (1998). The self and the body: II. The embodied self—self vs. non-self. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought21:85—111.
31.
——— (1999a). The dynamic principle in psychoanalysis: I. The classic theory. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought22:3—40.
32.
——— (1999b). The dynamic principle in psychoanalysis: II. Toward a revised theory of motivation. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought22:41—83.
33.
——— (1999c). The self-as-subject in psychoanalysis: I. The nature of subjectivity. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought22:155—201.
34.
——— (1999d). The self-as-subject in psychoanalysis: II. The subject in analysis. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought22:383—428.
35.
——— (2000a). The self-as-relational in psychoanalysis: I. Relational aspects of the self. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought23:177—204.
36.
——— (2000b). The self-as-relational in psychoanalysis: II. The self as related within the analytic process. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought23:205—247.
37.
——— (2000c). The self as structural. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought23:373—416.
38.
——— (2000d). The structural principle in psychoanalysis: I. The meaning of structure. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought23:283—330.
39.
——— (2000e). The structural principle in psychoanalysis: II. Structure formation and structural change. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought23:331—371.
40.
——— (2001). The self-as-person in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought23:479—523.
41.
——— (2003a). The Ethical Dimension of Psychoanalysis: A Dialogue . Albany: SUNY Press.
42.
——— (2003b). Mind, brain, and self in psychoanalysis: I. Problems and attempted solutions. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought26:279— 320.
43.
——— (2003c). Mind, brain, and self in psychoanalysis: II. Freud and the mind-body relation. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought26:321—344.
44.
——— (2003d). Mind, brain, and self in psychoanalysis: III. Psychoanalytic perspectives after Freud. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought26:345—386.
45.
——— (2004). Current psychoanalytic theories of the self: View and review. In Way Beyond Freud: Postmodern Psychoanalysis Observed, ed. J. Reppen, J. Tucker, & M.A. Schulman.London: Open Gate Press, pp. 66—99.
46.
——— (2006a). The mind-brain relation and neuroscientific foundations: I. The problem and neuroscientific approaches. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic70:87—101.
47.
——— (2006b). The mind-brain relation and neuroscientific foundations: II. Neurobehavioral integrations. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic70:102—124.
48.
——— (2006c). The mind-brain relation and neuroscientific foundations: III. Brain and psychopathology, the split brain, and dreaming. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic70:179—201.
49.
———(in press). Mind, brain, and self in psychoanalysis: Therapeutic implications of the mind-body relation. Psychoanalytic Psychology.
50.
Rangell, L. (1986). The executive functions of the ego: An extension of the concept of ego autonomy. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child41:1—37.
51.
Rizzuto, A.-M., Meissner, W.W., & Buie, D.H. (2003). TheDynamics of Human Aggression: Theoretical Foundations, Clinical Applications. New York: Brunner-Routledge.
52.
Ross, J.M. (2003). Preconscious defense analysis, memory and structural change. International Journal of Psychoanalysis84:59—76.
53.
Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. New York : Barnes & Noble.
54.
Sandler, J. (1981). Unconscious wishes and human relationships. Contemporary Psychoanalysis17:180—196.
55.
Schafer, R. (1976). A New Language for Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press.
56.
——— (1992). Retelling a Life: Narration and Dialogue in Psychoanalysis . New York: Basic Books.
57.
Smith, J.H. (1986). Primitive guilt. In Pragmatism's Freud: The Moral Disposition of Psychoanalysis, ed. J.H. Smith & W. Kerrigan.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 52—78.
58.
Sperry, R.W. (1977). Bridging science and values: A unifying view of mind and brain. American Psychologist32:237—245.
59.
Taylor, R. (1972). Causation. In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. P. Edwards. Vol. 2. New York: Macmillan / Free Press, pp. 56—66.
60.
Wallerstein, R.S. (1981). The bipolar self: Discussion of alternative perspectives . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association29:377—394.
61.
Wax, M.L. (1983). How Oedipus falsifies Popper: Psychoanalysis as a normative science. Psychiatry46:95—105.
62.
Weisman, A.D. (1965). The Existential Core of Psychoanalysis: Reality Sense and Responsibility. Boston: Little, Brown.
63.
Westen, D., & Gabbard, G.O. (2002). Developments in cognitive neuroscience: I. Conflict, compromise, and connectionism. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association50:53—98.
64.
Wolterstorff, N. (1984). Reason within the Bounds of Religion. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
