A Contemporary Integration of Modern and Postmodern Trends in Psychoanalysis

Abstract

Postmodernism has appeared on the psychoanalytic horizon and with it brought change and some confusion. Although many link or even conflate it with relational and intersubjectivity theory, those views are as subject to a postmodernist critique as other analytic orientations. Postmodernism can also be seen as usefully informing the concepts of psychoanalytic narrative and psychoanalytic space. It should not be viewed as an organized theory or movement that would entirely replace modernist ideas in psychoanalysis. Indeed, valid critiques of both modern and postmodern psychoanalytic positions have been advanced. In this climate the need for a viable integration remains urgent. Bruno Latour's development of the concept of hybrid structure as a way of dealing with the same kind of impasse in the field of science studies is presented, along with its applicability to the dilemma faced by psychoanalysis.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aron, L. (1991). The patient's experience of the analyst's subjectivity . Psychoanalytic Dialogues 1:29—51.

——— (1996). A Meeting of Minds: Mutuality in Psychoanalysis . Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press .

Bachelard, G. (1958). The Poetics of Space, transl. M. Jolas. Boston: Beacon Press, 1994.

Beebe, B. , & Lachmann, F. (1988). The contribution of mother-infant mutual influence to the origins of self- and object representations. Psychoanalytic Psychology 5:305—337.

Davies, R. (1972). The Manticore. In The Deptford Trilogy. New York: Penguin Books , 1990.

Dunn, J. (2003). Have we changed our view of the unconscious in contemporary clinical work? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 51:941—955.

Elliot, E. , & Spezzano, C. (1996). Psychoanalysis at its limits: Navigating the postmodern turn. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 65:52—83.

Fairfield, S. , Layton, L. , & Stack, C. , EDS. ( 2002).BringingthePlague: Toward a Postmodern Psychoanalysis . New York: Other Press.

Gabbard, G.O. (2001). Preserving conf identiality in the writing of case reports. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 82:1067—1068.

10.

Greenberg, J.R. (1991). Countertransference and reality. Psychoanalytic Dialogues 1:52—73.

11.

——— & Mitchell, S.A. (1983). Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

12.

Hoffman, I.Z. (1998). Ritual and Spontaneity in the Psychoanalytic Process . Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press .

13.

Latour, B. (199 1). We Have Never Been Postmodern, transl. C. Porter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.

14.

——— (1999). Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

15.

Leffert, M. (2003). Analysis and psychotherapy by telephone: Twenty years of clinical experience. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 51:101—130.

16.

Lyotard, J. (1988). Dialogue pour un temps de crise (interview). Le Monde, April 15, p. xxxviii.

17.

Malabou, C. , & Derrida, J. (1999). Counterpath, transl. D. Wills. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004.

18.

Mcgowan, J. (1991). Postmodernism and Its Critics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

19.

Modell, A.H. (1991). The therapeutic relationship as a paradoxical experience. Psychoanalytic Dialogues 1:13—28.

20.

Norris, C. (2002). Deconstruction: Theory and Practice. 3rd ed. London: Routledge .

21.

Ogden, T.H. (1997). Reverie and Interpretation. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.

22.

——— (2003). The analytic third: Implications for psychoanalytic theory and technique. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 73:167—195.

23.

Spence, D.P. (1982). Narrative Truth and Historical Truth: Meaning and Interpretation in Psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.

24.

——— (1989). Narrative appeal vs. historical validity. Contemporary Psychoanalysis 25:517—523.

25.

Stolorow, R.D. , & Atwood, G.E. (1992). Contexts of Being. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

26.

——— ——— & Brandshaft, B. (1994). The Intersubjective Perspective . Northvale, NJ: Aronson.