To Coerce and Be Coerced

Abstract

Coercion is a way of forcibly influencing others. While one's core conflicts may contribute to an experience of being coerced in any interaction, specific situations or circumstances commonly encountered in clinical practice set the stage for analyst or patient to feel forced or manipulated. The interaction that develops in these instances is conceptualized as a coercive enactment. Conditions that increase the susceptibility to coercing and being coerced may develop at any stage in the psychoanalytic process. Supervision and conversion from psychotherapy to psychoanalysis are examined as situations that predispose to coercion. Silences and other difficulties in maintaining the analytic frame, as well as crises in the life of the analyst, may also lead to coercive enactments. Pertinent literature is reviewed and illustrative clinical cases are presented.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bassen, C. (1989). Transference-countertransference enactment in the recommendation to convert from psychotherapy to psychoanalysis. International Review of Psychoanalysis 16:79—92.

Chused, J.F. (1991). The evocative power of enactments. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 39:615—640.

Freud, S. (1905). Fragment of the analysis of a case of hysteria . Standard Edition 7:3—122.

——— (1912a). On beginning the treatment. Standard Edition 12:123—144.

——— (1912b). The dynamics of transference. Standard Edition 12:99—108.

Grossman, L. (1996). The analyst's influence. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 64:681—692.

Hoffman, I.Z. (1996). The analyst's authority in the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 65:102—136.

Jacobs, T.J. (1986). On countertransference enactments. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 34:289—308.

Johan, M. (1992). Panel report: Enactments in psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 40:827—843.

10.

Katz, G.A. (1998). Where the action is: The enacted dimension of analytic process. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 46:1129— 1165.

11.

Levine, F.J. (2003). Authoritarianism in psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 51(Suppl.):204—245.

12.

Levy, S.T. , & Inderbitzen, L.B. (1997). Safety, danger, and analytic authority. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 45:377—394.

13.

——— ——— (2000). Suggestion and psychoanalytic technique. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 48:739—758.

14.

Macalpine, I. (1950). The development of the transference. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 19:501—539.

15.

Mclaughlin, J.T. (1991). Clinical and theoretical aspects of enactment . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 39:595—614.

16.

Pulver, S.E. (1995). The psychoanalytic process and mechanisms of therapeutic change. In Psychoanalysis: The Major Concepts, ed. B.E. Moore & B.D. Fine. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 81—94.

17.

Renik, O. (1996). The perils of neutrality. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 65:495— 517.

18.

Roughton, R.E. (1995). Action and acting out. In Psychoanalysis: The Major Concepts, ed. B.E. Moore & B.D. Fine. New Haven : Yale University Press, pp.130—145.

19.

Sandler, J. (1976). Countertransference and role-responsiveness. International Review of Psychoanalysis 3:43—47.

20.

Schafer, R. (1983). The Analytic Attitude. New York: Basic Books.

21.

——— (2005). Caring and coercive aspects of the analytic process . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 53:771—787.

22.

Stein, M.H. (1981). The unobjectionable part of the transference. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 29:869—892.

23.

Strean, H.S. (2002). A therapist's life-threatening disease. Psychoanalytic Inquiry 22:559—579.

24.

Valeros, J.A. (1989). Coercion: Technical problems in the psychoanalysis of children. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 44:165—187.