A clinical term is introduced to capture a defense that develops with the patient's deepening but fleeting awareness of painful transference feelings. The analyst's attention to countertransference in such situations is central to the analysis of these defenses. An attempt is made to distinguish defense enactments from other types of defenses, and to differentiate the analyst's countertransference reaction to this type of defense from countertransference reactions that might appear similar. The reasons for this dynamic in the interpersonal space are explored, and a clinical example that describes this phenomenon in the analytic moment is given.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aron, L. (1996). Meeting of Minds. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
2.
Baranger, M., Baranger, W., & Mom, J. (1983). Process and non-process in analytic work. International Journal of Psychoanalysis64:1—15.
3.
Bell, D. (2001). Projective identification. In Kleinian Theory: A Contemporary Perspective, ed. C. Bronstein.London: Whur Publishers , pp. 125—147.
4.
Bibring, E. (1954). Psychoanalysis and the dynamic psychotherapies . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association2:745—770.
5.
Bion, W. (1961). Experiences in Groups. New York: Basic Books.
6.
Boesky, D. (1982). Acting out: A reconsideration of the concept. International Journal of Psychoanalysis63:39—55.
7.
——— (1990). The psychoanalytic process and its components . Psychoanalytic Quarterly59:550—579.
8.
Bolognini, S. (2004). Psychoanalytic Empathy. London : Free Association Books.
9.
Bonominio, S. (2005). The person of the analyst. Presentation to Psychoanalytic Institute of New England, East, February 2004, Cambridge, MA.
10.
Bott-Spillius, E. (1988). Melanie Klein Today: Developments in Theory and Practice. Vol. 1. London: Routledge.
11.
Busch, F. (1994). Some ambiguities in the method of free association and their implications for technique. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association42:363—384.
12.
——— (1995). Do actions speak louder than words? A query into an enigma in analytic theory and technique. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association43:61—82.
——— (2001). Are we losing our mind?Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association49:739—751.
15.
Chused, J.F. (1991). The evocative power of enactments. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association39:615—639.
16.
Feinsilver, D.B. (1990). Therapeutic action and the story of the middle . Contemporary Psychoanalysis26:137—159.
17.
——— (1999). Counteridentification, comprehensive countertransference and therapeutic action: Toward resolving the intrapsychic-interactional dichotomy . Psychoanalytic Quarterly78:264—301.
18.
Freud, S. (1914). Remembering, repeating and working-through. Standard Edition12:147—156.
19.
Gray, P. (1994). The Ego and Analysis of Defense. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
20.
Hinshelwood, R. (1989). A Dictionary of Kleinian Thought. London: Free Association Books.
21.
Jacobs, T. (2001). Commentary on Busch. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association49:752—758.
22.
Joseph, B. (1997). Projective identification: Some clinical aspects . In The Contemporary Kleinians of London, ed. R. Schafer.Madison, CT: International Universities Press, pp. 100—116.
23.
Loewald, H. (1975). Psychoanalysis as art, and the fantasy character of the psychoanalytic situation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association23:277—299.
24.
Mclauglin, J.T. (1991). Clinical and theoretical aspects of enactment . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association39:596—614.
25.
Ross, J.M. (2003). Preconscious defense analysis, memory and structural change. International Journal of Psychoanalysis84:59—76.
26.
Sandler, J. (1976). Countertransference and role-responsiveness. International Review of Psychoanalysis3:43—47.
27.
Schmidt-Hellerau, C. (2002). Why aggression? Metapsychological, clinical and technical considerations. International Journal of Psychoanalysis83:1269—1289.
28.
——— (2005). The other side of Oedipus. Psychoanalytic Quarterly74:187—218.
29.
Sodré, I. (2004). Who's who? Notes on pathological identification . In In Pursuit of Psychic Change, ed. E. Hargreaves & A. Varchevker.New York: Brunner-Routledge , pp. 53—65.
30.
Sugarman, A. (2003). A new model for conceptualizing insightfulness in the psychoanalysis of young children. Psychoanalytic Quarterly72:325—356.
