A Developmental Perspective On the Ideal of Reason in American Constitutional Law

Abstract

The ideal of reason is central to contemporary accounts of citizenship in American constitutional law. The individual capacity for reasoned choice lies closely aligned with the constitutional values of personal liberty and democratic self-government as they have evolved in Supreme Court decisions over the past century. Yet as presently conceived, the ideal of reason in constitutional law overlooks the process by which individuals actually acquire the capacity to choose their own values and commitments or to engage in reasoned thinking about collective ends. This paper argues that we cannot hope to sustain and foster a constitutional polity committed to the principles of individual liberty and democratic self-government without knowing something about how individual citizens come to possess this requisite skill of mind. A developmental perspective on reason in constitutional law provides a framework for examining the source and contours of the psychological skills that make it possible to lead an autonomous, self-directed life and to participate meaningfully in the processes of democratic self-government. Developmental psychology, together with research in related fields, provides empirical support for the proposition that the psychological capacity for reasoned thinking has its roots in the early caregiving relationship. Thus, a comprehensive and integrated constitutional family law must recognize the role of early caregiving in the political socialization of children. This developmental approach offers a substantial reworking of constitutional doctrine in the areas of family privacy, parental rights, congressional power, and affirmative welfare rights.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Astington, J.W. , Harris, P.L. , & Olson, D.R. (1988). Developing Theories of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Behrends, R.S. , & Blatt, S.J. (1985). Internalization and psychological development throughout the life cycle. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 40:11—39.

Bohman, J. , & Rehg, W. , EDS. (1997). Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Brakel, L.A.W. , Shevrin, H. , & Villa, K.K. (2002). The priority of primary process categorizing: Experimental evidence supporting a psychoanalytic developmental hypothesis .Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 50:483—505.

Bruner, J. (1995). From joint attention to the meeting of minds: An introduction. In Joint Attention: Its Origins and Role in Development, ed. C. Moore & P.J. Dunham. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 1—14.

Buckley, P. , ED. (1986). Essential Papers on Object Relations. New York: New York University Press.

Cassidy, J. , & Shauer, P.R. , Eds. (1999). Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research and Clinical Applications. New York: Guilford Press.

Cicchetti, D. , & Cohen, D.J. (1995). Perspectives on developmental psychopathology . In Developmental Psychopathology: Vol. 1. Theory and Methods , ed. D. Cicchetti & D.J. Cohen. New York: Wiley, pp. 3—22.

Cover, R. (1986). Violence and the word. Yale Law Journal 95:1601—1630.

10.

Dailey, A. (1998). Holmes and the romantic mind. Duke Law Journal 48:429—510.

11.

——— (2000). The hidden economy of the unconscious. Chicago-Kent Law Review 74:1599—1624.

12.

Dewey, J. (1918). The cult of irrationality. The New Republic, Nov. 9, 1918, p. 35.

13.

Erikson, E. (1963). Childhood and Society. New York: Norton.

14.

Fonagy, P. (2001). Attachment Theory and Psychoanalysis. New York: Other Press.

15.

——— Gergely, G. , Jurist, E. , & Target, M. (2002). Affect Regulation, Mentalization, and the Development of the Self. New York: Other Press .

16.

Frank, J. (1930). Law and the Modern Mind. New York: Brentano.

17.

Freud, S. (1915). The unconscious. Standard Edition 14:161—215.

18.

Gay, P. ( 1982). Liberalism and regression. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 37:523—545.

19.

Hartmann, H. (1939). Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation. New York: International Universities Press .

20.

Hofstadter, R. (1963). Anti-intellectualism in American Life. New York: Knopf.

21.

Holmes, O.W., JR. (1881). The Common Law. Boston: Little, Brown.

22.

Koh, H.H. , & Slye, R.C. , Eds. (1999). Deliberative Democracy and Human Rights. New Haven: Yale University Press.

23.

Loewald, H.W. (1980). Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press.

24.

Mahler, M.S. , Pine, F. , & Bergman, A. (1975). The Psychological Birth of the Human Infant: Symbiosis and Individuation. New York: Basic Books.

25.

Mayes, L. , & Cohen, D.J. (1992). The development of a capacity for imagination in early childhood. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 47:23—47.

26.

——— ——— (1994). Experiencing self and others: Contributions from studies of autism to the psychoanalytic theory of social development. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 42:191—218.

27.

——— ——— (1996). Anna Freud and developmental psychoanalytic psychology . Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 51:117—141.

28.

Mcloyd, V.C. (1998). Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development . American Psychologist 53:185—204.

29.

Meissner, W.W. (1979). Internalization and object relations. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 27:345—360.

30.

Rubenfeld, J. (1989). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review 102:737— 807.

31.

Sameroff, A.J. , & Fiese, B.H. (2000). Models of development and developmental risk. In Handbook of Infant Mental Health, ed. C.H. Zeanah. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 3—19.

32.

Schafer, R. (1972). Internalization: Process or fantasy? Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 27:411—436.

33.

Schimek, J. , & Goldberger, L. (1995). Thought. In Psychoanalysis: The Major Concepts, ed. B.E. Moore & B.D. Fine. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 209—220.

34.

Schwaber, P. (1999). The Cast of Characters: A Reading of Ulysses. New Haven: Yale University Press.

35.

Stern, D. (1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York : Basic Books.

36.

Stone, G.R. (2003). Civil liberties in wartime. Journal of Supreme Court History 28:215—251.

37.

Tyson, P. , & Tyson, R.L. (1990). Psychoanalytic Theories of Development: An Integration . New Haven: Yale University Press .

38.

Vaughan, S. (1997). The Talking Cure: The Science Behind Psychotherapy . New York: Putnam.

39.

Wellman, H.M. (1990). The Child's Theory of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

40.

Winnicott, D.W. (1965). The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. New York: International Universities Press.

41.

Anne C. Dailey

42.

University of Connecticut School of Law 65 Elizabeth Street

43.

University of Connecticut School of Law 65 Elizabeth Street Hartford, CT 06105 E-mail: adailey@law.uconn.edu

44.

E-mail: adailey@law.uconn.edu