Features of dynamical systems thinking can illuminate insufficiently recognized levels of psychoanalytic process. A central aspect of dynamical models is that changes in complex systems are unpredictable and arise out of the interaction of elements. Examination of the moment-by-moment micro-foreground, or local level, of psychoanalytic sessions led to the conclusion that indeterminacy and surprise are inherent properties of intersubjective systems. This indeterminacy, or sloppiness, comprises several interrelated features of the dialogue: “fuzzy” intentionalizing, unpredictability, improvisation, variation, and redundancy. Audiotaped transcripts of two analytic sessions illustrate how these sloppy features generate unpredictable and potentially creative elements that contribute to psychotherapeutic change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. (2002). Infant Research and Adult Treatment: Co-constructing Interactions. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
2.
Benjamin, J. (1995). Like Subjects, Love Objects. New Haven: Yale University Press.
3.
Boston Change Process Study Group (2002). Report III: Explicating the implicit: The local level and the microprocess of change in the analytic situation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis83:1051—1062.
4.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. New York: Basic Books.
5.
Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Social Cognition, Joint Attention, and Communicative Competence from 9 to 18 Months of Age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Vol. 63.
6.
Dilthey, W. (1976). Selected Writings, ed. H.P. Riokmen.London: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Edelman, G.M. (1992). Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind. New York: Basic Books.
8.
Feldman, C.F., & Kalmar, D. (1996). Autobiography and fiction as modes of thought . In: Modes of Thought: Explorations in Culture and Cognition , ed. D. Olson & N. Torrence.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 106—122.
9.
Freeman, W. (1995). Societies of Brains. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
——— (1999). How Brains Make up Their Minds. London: Weidenfeld & Johnson.
11.
Hoffman, I.Z. (1998). Ritual and Spontaneity in the Psychoanalytic Process: A Dialectical Constructivist View. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
12.
Husserl, E. (1930). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution, transl. R. Rojcewicz & A. Schuwer. Dordrecht , Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.
13.
Jacoby, L.L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General110:300—324.
14.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.
15.
Lyons-Ruth, K. (1999). The two-person unconscious: Intersubjective dialogue, enactive relational representation, and the emergence of new forms of relational organization. Psychoanalytic Inquiry19:576—617.
16.
——— (2000). “I sense that you sense that I sense . . .”: Sander's recognition process and the specificity of relational moves in the psychotherapeutic setting. Infant Mental Health Journal21:85—98.
17.
Meltzoff, A. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology31:838—850.
18.
Mitchell, S. (1997). Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
19.
Modell, A. (2003). Imagination and the Meaningful Brain. Cambridge: MIT Press.
20.
Ogden, T. (1997). Reverie and Interpretation. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
21.
Prigogine, I. (1997). The End of Certainty: Time, Chaos, and the New Laws of Nature. New York: Free Press .
22.
Sander, L. (1980). Investigation of the infant and its caregiving environment as a biological system. In The Course of Life: Vol. 1. Infancy and Early Childhood, ed. S. Greenspan & G. Pollock.Washington, DC: NIMH, pp. 177—201.
23.
——— (1997). Paradox and resolution: From the beginning. In Handbook of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: Vol. 1. Infants and Preschoolers: Development and Syndromes, ed. S. Greenspan, S. Wieder, & J. Osofsky.New York: Wiley, pp. 153—160.
24.
Schachter, D.L., & Moscovitch, M. (1984). Infants, amnesia and dissociable memory systems. In Infant Memory, ed. M. Moscovitch. New York: Plenum, pp. 173—216.
25.
Schafer, R. (1992). Retelling a Life. New York : Basic Books.
26.
Schore, A. (1994). Affect Regulation and the Origins of the Self: The Neuro-biology of Emotional Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27.
Stern, D.N. (1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant. New York: Basic Books.
28.
——— (2004). The Present Moment in Psychotherapy and Everyday Life. New York: Norton.
29.
——— Sander, L.W., Nahum, J.P., Harrison, A.M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A.C., Bruschweiler-Stern, N., & Tronick, E.Z. (1998). Non-interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy: the something more than interpretation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis79:908—921.
30.
Stolorow, R. (1997). Dynamic, dyadic, intersubjective systems: An evolving paradigm for psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology14:337— 346.
31.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. (1994). A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge: MIT Press.
32.
Tronick, E. (1998). Interventions that effect change in psychotherapy: A model based on infant research. Infant Mental Health Journal19:277— 353.
33.
——— Bruschweiler-Stern, N., Harrison, A.M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A.C., Nahum, J.P., Sander, L.W., & Stern, D. (1998). Dyadically expanded states of consciousness and the process of therapeutic change. Infant Mental Health Journal19:290—299.
34.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1934). Thought and Language, transl. E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1962.
35.
Weiss, P. (1947). The problem of specificity in growth and development. Yale Journal of Biology &Medicine19:234—278.
36.
Westen, D., & Gabbard, G. (2002a). Developments in cognitive neuroscience: I. Conflict, compromise, and connectionism. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association50:53—98.
37.
——— ——— (2002b). Developments in cognitive neuroscience: II. Implications for theories of transference. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association50:99—134.
