The proliferation of new developmental and clinical theories broadly termed “psychoanalytic” demands a methodology for making systematic comparisons to establish the commonalities and distinctions among them. This article presents an empirical method for the comparative evaluation of such theories. The Mother-To-Child Object Representation / Internal Working Model Q-sort is a 100-item instrument constructed to assess the quality of the prototypical mother's object representation and internal working model of her child at age five. Object relations judges were asked to sort these items for a complex, differentiated, integrated object representation of a five-year-old, attachment judges for a secure, coherent, freely valuing internal working model of a five-year-old. Judges' criterion Q-sorts in each group yielded a composite criterion Q-sort of the quality of the prototypical mother's mental representation of her child according to each group's theoretical perspective. The Spearman-Brown correlation between the two composite criterion Q-sorts was r = .90, p < .001, suggesting that when confined to a 100-item common vocabulary, judges representing each theoretical construct agreed on the conceptual relatedness of object representations and internal working models. The theoretical constructs of object representations and internal working models share common assumptions in need of further exploration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aber, J.L., & Baker, A.J.L. (1990). Security of attachment in toddlerhood: Modifying assessment procedures for joint clinical and research purposes. In Attachment in the Preschool Years: Theory, Research, and Intervention , ed. M.T. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & E.M. Cummings.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 427—460.
2.
Ainsworth, M.D.S. (1979). Infant-mother attachment. American Psychologist34:932—937.
3.
——— Blehar, M.C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Blatt, S.J. (1974). Levels of object representation in anaclitic and introjective depression. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child29:107—157.
5.
——— (1995). Representational structures in psychopathology . In Rochester Symposium on Developmental Psychopathology: Vol. 6. Emotion, Cognition, and Representation, ed. D. Cicchetti & S.L. Toth.Rochester: University of Rochester Press , pp. 1—33.
6.
——— Chevron, E.S., Quinlan, D.M., Schaffer, C.E., & Wein, S. (1992). The assessment of qualitative and structural dimensions of object representations. Rev. ed. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University.
7.
——— & Lerner, H. (1983). Investigations in the psychoanalytic theory of object relations and object representations. In Empirical Studies of Psychoanalytic Theories, ed. J. Masling.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press , pp. 189—249.
8.
———Wiseman, H., Prince-Gibson, E., & Gatt, C. (1991). Object representations and change in clinical functioning. Psychotherapy28:273—283.
9.
Block, J. (1961). The Q-sort Method in Personality Assessment and Psychiatric Research. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1978.
10.
Block, J.H., & Block, J. (1980). The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior. In Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, ed. W.A. Collins. Vol. 13. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 39—101.
11.
Bollas, C. (1987). The Shadow of the Object: Psychoanalysis of the Unknown Thought. New York: Columbia University Press.
12.
Bowlby, J. (1960). Grief and mourning in infancy and early childhood . Psychoanalytic Study of the Child15:9—52.
13.
——— (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. 2nd ed.. New York: Basic Books, 1982.
14.
——— (1973). Attachment and Loss: Vol.2. Separation, Anxiety and Anger. New York: Basic Books .
15.
——— (1980). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 3. Loss, Sadness and Depression. New York: Basic Books .
16.
Bretherton, I. (1987). New perspectives on attachment relations: Security, communication, and internal working models. In Handbook of Infant Development, ed. J.D. Osofsky.2nd ed. New York: Wiley , pp. 1061—1100.
17.
——— & Waters, E., EDS. (1985). Growing Points in Attachment Theory And Research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development50 (1—2, Serial No. 209).
18.
Diamond, D., & Blatt, S.J. (1994). Internal working models and the representational world in attachment and psychoanalytic theories. In Attachment in Adults: Clinical and Developmental Perspectives, ed. M.B. Sperling & W.H. BermanNew York: Guilford Press .
19.
——— Clarkin, J., Levine, H., Levy, K., Foelsch, P., & Yeomans, F. (1999). Borderline conditions and attachment: A preliminary report. Psychoanalytic Inquiry19:831—884.
20.
Fonagy, P. (1999). Psychoanalytic theory from the viewpoint of attachment theory and research. In Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications, ed. J. Cassidy & P.R. ShaverNew York: Guilford Press, pp. 595—624.
21.
——— (2001). Attachment Theory and Psychoanalysis. New York: Other Press.
22.
Freud, A. (1960). Discussion of Dr. John Bowlby's paper. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child15:53—62.
23.
George, C., Kaplan, N., & Main, M. (1996). Adult Attachment Interview. 3rd ed. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.
24.
Goodman, G. (2002). The Internal World and Attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
25.
——— & Moon, M.Y. (1995). The Mother-To-Child Object Representation / Internal Working Model Q-sort. Unpublished manuscript, Cornell University Medical College, White Plains, NY.
26.
Higgins, E.T. (1989). Continuities and discontinuities in self-regulatory and self-evaluative processes: A developmental theory relating self and affect . Journal of Personality57:407—444.
27.
Kernberg, O. (1986). Borderline personality organization. In Essential Papers on Borderline Disorders: One Hundred Years at the Border, ed. M. StoneNew York: NYU Press, pp. 279—319.
28.
Kobak, R.R., Cole, H.E., Ferenz-Gillies, R., Fleming, W.S., & Gamble, W. (1993). Attachment and emotion regulation during mother-teen problem solving: A control theory analysis. Child Development64:231—245.
29.
——— & Sceery, A. (1988). Attachment in late adolescence: Working models, affect regulation, and representations of self and others. Child Development59:135—146.
30.
Krohn, A., & Mayman, M. (1974). Object representations in dreams and projective tests: A construct validational study. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic38:445—466.
31.
Levine, L.V., & Tuber, S.B. (1993). Measures of mental representation: Clinical and theoretical considerations. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic57:69—87.
32.
Levy, K.N., & Blatt, S.J. (1999). Attachment theory and psychoanalysis: Further differentiation within insecure attachment patterns. Psychoanalytic Inquiry19:541—575.
33.
——— ——— & Shaver, P.R. (1998). Attachment styles and parental representations . Journal of Personality & Social Psychology74:407—419.
34.
Maccoby, E.E. (1959). Role-taking in childhood and its consequences for social learning. Child Development30:239—252.
35.
——— (1961). The taking of adult roles in middle childhood . Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology63:493—503.
36.
Main, M., & Goldwyn, R. (1994). Adult attachment scoring and classification systems. 6th ed. Unpublished manuscript, University College London .
37.
——— Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In Growing Points in Attachment Theory and Research, ed. I. Bretherton & E. Waters. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development50(1-2, Serial No. 209):66—104.
38.
Moon, M.Y. (1999). Longitudinal correlates of mothers' object representations of their 5-year-old children: An exploratory study. Unpublished dissertation, ColumbiaUniversity.
39.
Pine, F. (1990). Drive, Ego, Object, and Self: A Synthesis for Clinical Work. New York: Basic Books .
40.
Schachter, F.F., Cooper, A., & Gordet, R. (1968). A method for assessing personality development for follow-up evaluations of the preschool child. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development33(3, Serial No. 119):1—55.
41.
Slade, A. (1999). Attachment theory and research: Implications for the theory and practice of individual psychotherapy with adults. In Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications , ed. J. Cassidy & P.R. ShaverNew York: Guilford Press , pp. 575—594.
42.
——— Aber, J.L., Cohen, L., Fiorello, J., Meyer, J., Desear, P., & Waller, S. (1993). Parent Development Interview coding system. Rev . ed. Unpublished manuscript, City University of New York .
43.
Stern, D.N. (1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York : Basic Books.
44.
Treurniet, N. (1993). What is psychoanalysis now?International Journal of Psychoanalysis74:873—893.
45.
Urist, J. (1980). Object relations. In Encyclopedia of Clinical Assessment, ed. R.H. Woody Vol. 2. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 821—833.
46.
Waters, E., & Deane, K.E. (1985). Defining and assessing individual differences in attachment relationships: Q-methodology and the organization of behavior in infancy and early childhood. In Growing Points in Attachment Theory and Research, ed. I. Bretherton & E. Waters. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development50(1—2, Serial No. 209):41—65.
47.
Westen, D. (1993). Social cognition and object relations scale: Q-sort and TAT data (SCORS-Q). Rev. ed. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University Medical School.
48.
Zeanah, C.H., Anders, T.F., Seifer, R., & Stern, D.N. (1989). Implications of research on infant development for psychodynamic theory and practice. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry28:657—668.
49.
Zelnick, L., & Buchholz, E.S. (1990). The concept of mental representations in light of recent infant research. Psychoanalytic Psychology7:29—58.
