Traumatic aspects of the lives of John Bowlby and Margaret Mahler can be seen to inform their intellectual careers, a perspective that suggests that attachment theory and separation-individuation theory are far more consonant with one another than otherwise. Articulating the domains of convergence between the two theories reveals the essential complementarity of the special strengths of each. Both theories were attempts to understand the role of experience in the development of mental representations. Mahler paid close clinical attention to inner mental states and their evolution, while Bowlby searched for behavioral correlates that could lend themselves to empirical observation and inferences about internal representations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ainsworth, M. (1982). Attachment: Retrospect and prospect. In The Place of Attachment in Human Behaviour, ed. C.M. Parkes & J. Stevenson-Hinde.London: Tavistock .
2.
——— BLEHAR, M.D.Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of Attachment . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
Bergman, A., & Fahey M. (1994). Further inquiry into negotiation of separation-individuation conflicts: A boy and a girl respond to fluctuations in mother's emotional availability. Psychoanalytic Quarterly14:83—110.
4.
Bowlby, J. (1940). The influence of early environment in the development of neurosis and neurotic character. International Journal of Psychoanalysis21:1—25.
5.
——— (1944). Forty-four juvenile thieves: Their characters and home-life. International Journal of Psychoanalysis25:19—53, 107—128.
6.
——— (1949). The study and reduction of group tensions in the family. Human Relations2:123—128.
7.
——— (1951). Maternal Care and Mental Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
8.
——— (1958a). Can I Leave My Baby?London : National Association for Mental Health.
9.
——— (1958b). The nature of the child's tie to his mother. International Journal of Psychoanalysis39:350—373.
10.
——— (1960a). Grief and mourning in infancy and early childhood . Psychoanalytic Study of the Child15:9—52.
11.
——— (1960b). Separation anxiety. International Journal of Psychoanalysis41:89—113.
12.
——— (1969). Attachment: Attachment and Loss Vol. I. New York: Basic Books.
13.
——— (1973). Separation, Anxiety and Anger: Attachment and Loss Vol. II. New York: Basic Books .
14.
——— (1980). Loss, Sadness and Depression: Attachment and Loss Vol. III. New York: Basic Books .
15.
——— (1988). On knowing what you are not supposed to know and feeling what you are not supposed to feel. In A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. New York: Basic Books, pp. 99—118.
16.
——— Miller, E., & Winnicott, D.W. (1939). Evacuation of small children (letter). British Medical Journal, December 16, pp. 1202—1203.
17.
——— Robertson, J., & Rosenbluth, D. (1952). A two-year-old goes to hospital. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child7:82—94.
18.
Bretherton, I. (1995). The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. In Attachment Theory: Social, Developmental, and Clinical Perspectives, ed. S. Goldberg, R. Muir , & J. Kerr.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 45—84.
19.
Byng-Hall, J. (1987). Unpublished interview with John Bowlby.
20.
Carlson, E., & Sroufe, L.A. (1995). Contribution of attachment theory to developmental psychopathology. In Developmental Psychopathology: Vol. 1. Theory and Methods, ed. D. Cicchetti & D.J. Cohen, New York : Wiley, pp. 581—617.
21.
Durbin, E.F.M., & Bowlby, J. (1938). Personal Aggressiveness and the War. London: Kegan Paul.
22.
Eisold, K. (1998). The splitting of the New York Psychoanalytic Society and the construction of psychoanalytic authority. International Journal of Psychoanalysis79:871—885.
23.
Fleming, J. (1975). Some observations on object constancy in the psychoanalysis of adults. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child24:9—47.
24.
Fonagy, P. (1999). Psychoanalytic theory from the viewpoint of attachment theory and research. In Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research and Clinical Applications, ed. J. Cassidy & P.R. Shaver.New York: Guilford Press, pp. 595—624.
25.
——— (2001). Attachment Theory and Psychoanalysis. New York: Other Press.
26.
Fraiberg, S. (1969). Libidinal object constancy and mental representation . Psychoanalytic Study of the Child24:9—47.
27.
Freud, A. (1960). Discussion of Dr. John Bowlby's paper. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child15:53—62.
28.
——— (1968). Contribution to panel discussion. International Journal of Psychoanalysis49:506—512.
29.
Furman, E. (1974). A Child's Parent Dies: Studies in Childhood Bereavement . New Haven: Yale University Press .
30.
Hamilton, V. (1991). Personal reminiscences of John Bowlby. Tavistock Gazette, Autumn.
31.
Hartmann, H. (1952). The mutual influences in the development of the ego and the id. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child7:9—30.
32.
Hermann, I. (1936). Clinging /going-in-search: A contrasting pair of instincts and their relations to sadism and masochism. Psychoanalytic Quarterly45:5—36, 1976 .
33.
Holmes, J. (1993). John Bowlby and Attachment Theory. New York: Routledge.
34.
Jacobson, E. (1964). The Self and the Object World. New York: International Universities Press.
35.
Karen, R. (1990). Becoming attached: What children need. Atlantic Monthly, February, pp. 35—70.
36.
Lyons-Ruth, K. (1991). Rapprochement or approchement: Mahler's theory reconsidered from the vantage point of recent research on early attachment relationships. Psychoanalytic Psychology8:1—23.
37.
——— (2003). Dissociation and the parent-infant dialogue: A longitudinal perspective from attachment research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association51:883—911.
38.
Mahler, M. (1963). Thoughts about development and individuation. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child18:307—324.
39.
——— (1966). Note on the development of basic moods: The depressive affect. In Psychoanalysis—A General Psychology: Essays in Honor of Heinz Hartmann, ed. R.M. Lowenstein , L.M. Newman, M. Schur, & A.J. Solnit.New York: International Universities Press, pp. 152—168.
40.
——— (1977). Psychoanalytic movement. Oral History Research Office, Columbia University.
41.
——— (1983). The meaning of developmental research of earliest infancy as related to the study of separation-individuation. In Frontiers of Infant Psychiatry, ed. J. Call, E. Galenson, & R. Tyson.New York: Basic Books, pp. 3—6.
42.
——— & Furer, M. (1960). Observations on research regarding the “symbiotic syndrome” of infantile psychosis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly29:317—327.
43.
——— & Mcdevitt, J.B. (1982). Thoughts on the emergence of the sense of self, with particular emphasis on the body self. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association30:827—848.
44.
——— Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1975). The Psychological Birth of the Human Infant: Symbiosis and Individuation. New York: Basic Books.
45.
Mahler-Schoenberger, M. (1942). Pseudoimbecility: A magic cap of invisibility . Psychoanalytic Quarterly11:149—164.
46.
Main, M. (2000). The organized categories of infant, child, and adult attachment: Flexible vs. inflexible attention under attachment-related stress. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association48:1055—1096.
47.
Mcdevitt, J. (1975). Separation-individuation and object constancy . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association23:712—742.
48.
——— (1991). Contributions of separation-individuation theory to the understanding of pychopathology during the prelatency years. In Beyond the Symbiotic Orbit: Advances in Separation-Individuation—Essays in Honor of Selma Kramer, M.D, ed. S. Akhtar & H. Parens.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 153—169.
49.
Parens, H. (1980). An exploration of the relations of instinctual drives and the symbiosis/separation-individual process. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association28:89—114.
50.
Pine, F. (1974). Libidinal object constancy: A theoretical note . In Psychoanalysis and Contemporary ScienceL. Goldberger& V.H Rosen , ed. Vol. 3. New York : International Universities Press, pp. 307—313.
51.
——— (1992). Some refinements of the separation-individuation concept in light of research on infants. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child47:103—116.
52.
Schur, M. (1960). Discussion of Dr. John Bowlby's paper. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child15:63—84.
53.
Senn, M.J.E. (1977). Unpublished interview with John Bowlby. Archives, Tavistock Joint Library, London .
54.
Settlage, C.F. (1977). The psychoanalytic understanding of narcissistic and borderline personality disorders: Advances in developmental theory. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association25:805—833.
55.
Slade, A. (1999). Attachment theory and research: Implications for the theory and practice of individual psychotherapy with adults. In Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research and Clinical Applications , ed. J. Cassidy & P.R. Shaver.New York: Guilford Press , pp. 575—594.
56.
——— (2000). The development and organization of attachment: Implications for psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association48:1117—1174.
57.
Spitz, R. (1957). No and Yes. New York: International Universities Press.
58.
——— (1960). Discussion of Dr. John Bowlby's paper. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child15:85—94.
59.
——— (1996). Emotional Development: The Organization of Emotional Life in the Early Years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Stepansky, P.E., ED. (1988). The Memoirs of Margaret S. Mahler. New York: Free Press.
61.
Tyson, P. (2000). Psychoanalysis, development, and the life cycle . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association48:1045—1049.
62.
Van Dijken, S. (1997). The first half of John Bowlby's life: A search for the roots of attachment theory. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leiden.
