Recent contributions to the psychoanalytic literature propose new ways of understanding analytic neutrality, anonymity, abstinence, and self-disclosure. They advocate elective self-disclosure by the analyst as an antidote to the allegedly game-playing quality of transference and resistance analysis. The analytic relationship, they assert, becomes unreal when attempts are made to observe the principles of neutrality and abstinence. Both are seen as ill-conceived because of the irreducible subjectivity and unwarranted authority of the analyst. These relational and interactional views are criticized because (1) they ignore the fact that transference and resistance analysis have from Freud onward been accepted as minimal criteria qualifying a clinical process as psychoanalytic; (2) elective self-disclosure carries metapsychological implications dismissing not only Freud's theory of motivation but motivation as a basic feature of human personality; (3) they do not recognize interpersonal relations as mental events and so do not consider the ego's ability to create intrapsychic representations of object relations; (4) elective self-disclosures within the empathic parameters of the analytic situation are themselves unreal compared to the reality of the patient's experience with other objects. Abstinence and neutrality as ideals facilitate maintenance of an internal holding environment or container for the analyst's countertransference.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, E., & Bachant, J.L. (1996). Free association and analytic neutrality: the basic structure of the psychoanalytic situation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association44:1021—1046.
2.
Bachant, J.L., & Adler, E. (1997). Transference: Co-constructed or brought to the interaction?Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association45:1097—1120.
3.
Boesky, D. (1989). The questions and curiosity of the psychoanalyst . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association37:579—604.
4.
——— (1990). The psychoanalytic process and its components . Psychoanalytic Quarterly59:550—584.
5.
Brenner, C. (1996). The nature of knowledge and the limits of authority in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly65:21—31.
6.
Busch, F. (1998). Self-disclosure ain't what it's cracked up to be, at least not yet. Psychoanalytic Inquiry18:518—529.
7.
Cavell, M. (1998). Brief communication: In response to Owen Renik's “The analyst's subjectivity and the analyst's objectivity.”International Journal of Psychoanalysis79:1195—1202.
8.
Chused, J.F. (1992). The patient's perception of the analyst: The hidden transference. Psychoanalytic Quarterly56:161—184.
9.
Eagle, M.N., Wolitzky, D.L., & Wakefield, J.C. (2001). The analyst's knowledge and authority: A critique of the “new view” in psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association49:457—489.
10.
Ehrenberg, D.B. (1992). The Intimate Edge: Extending the Reach of Psychoanalytic Interaction. New York: Norton.
11.
Freud, A. (1936). The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense. New York: International Universities Press, 1966.
12.
Freud S. (1914a). On the history of the psycho-analytic movement . Standard Edition14:3—66.
13.
——— (1914b). Remembering, repeating and working-through. Standard Edition12:147—156.
14.
——— (1915). Observations on transference-love. Standard Edition12:159—171.
15.
——— (1919). Lines of advance in psycho-analytic therapy. Standard Edition17:157—168.
16.
——— (1926). Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety. Standard Edition20:77—172.
17.
Gerson, S. (1996). Neutrality, resistance and self-disclosure in intersubjective psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues6:623—647.
18.
Greenberg, J.R., & Mitchell, S.A. (1983). Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Grubrich-Simitis, I. (1986). Six letters of Sigmund Freud and Sandor Ferenczi on the interrelationship of psychoanalytic theory and technique. International Review of Psychoanalysis13:259—277.
21.
Hanly, C. (1998). Reflections on the analyst's self-disclosure. Psychoanalytic Inquiry18:550—565.
22.
——— (1999). On subjectivity and objectivity in psychoanalysis . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association47:427—444.
23.
Hartmann, H. (1956). Notes on the reality principle. In Essays on Ego Psychology. New York: International Universities Press, 1964, pp. 241—267.
24.
Jacobs, T.J. (1991). The Use of the Self: Countertransference and Communication in the Analytic Situation. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
25.
——— (1999). Countertransference past and present: A review of the concept. International Journal of Psychoanalysis80:575—591.
26.
Kantrowitz, J.L. (1997). A different perspective on the therapeutic process: The impact of the patient on the analyst. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association45:125—153.
27.
——— (1999). The role of the preconscious in psychoanalysis . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association47:66—89.
28.
Kernberg, O.F. (1996). The analyst's authority in the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanalytic Quarterly65:137—157.
29.
Levenson, E. (1996). Aspects of self-revelation and self-disclosure . Contemporary Psychoanalysis32:237—248.
30.
Levy, S.T., & Inderbitzin, L.B. (1997). Safety, danger, and the analyst's authority. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association45: 377—394.
31.
Louw, F., & Pitman, M. (2001). Irreducible subjectivity and interactionism: A critique. International Journal of Psychoanalysis82:747—765.
32.
Marcus, D.M. (1998). Self-disclosure: The wrong issue. Psychoanalytic Inquiry18:566—579.
33.
Marris, P. (1982). Attachment and society. In The Place of Attachment in Human Behavior, ed. C. Murray-Parkes & J. Stevenson-Hinde.New York: Basic Books, pp. 185—204.
34.
Meissner, W.W. (1996). The therapeutic alliance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
35.
——— (2002). The problem of self-disclosure in psychoanalysis . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association50:827—867.
36.
Miletic, M.J. (1998). Rethinking self-disclosure: An example of the clinical utility of the analyst's self-disclosing activities. Psychoanalytic Inquiry18:580—600.
37.
Mitchell, S.A. (1998). The analyst's knowledge and authority. Psychoanalytic Quarterly67:1—31.
38.
——— (1999). Attachment theory and the psychoanalytic tradition. Reflections on human relationality. Psychoanalytic Dialogues9:85—107.
39.
Orange, D.M., & Stolorow, R.D. (1998). Self-disclosure from the perspective of intersubjectivity theory. Psychoanalytic Inquiry18:530—537.
40.
Poland W.S. (1996). Melting the Darkness: The Dyad and Principles of Clinical Practice. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
41.
Psychoanalytic Inquiry (1998). Special issue: Perspectives on the analyst's self-disclosure during psychoanalysis , ed. M.J. Miletic. Vol.18, no. 4.
42.
Renik, O. (1995). The ideal of the anonymous analyst and the problem of self-disclosure. Psychoanalytic Quarterly64:466—495.
43.
——— (1996). The perils of neutrality. Psychoanalytic Quarterly65: 495—517.
44.
——— (1998a). The analyst's subjectivity and the analyst's objectivity. International Journal of Psychoanalysis79:487—497.
45.
——— (1998b). Getting real in analysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly67: 566—593.
46.
——— (1998c). The role of countertransference enactment in a successful clinical psychoanalysis. In Enactment: Toward a New Approach to the Therapeutic Relationship, ed. S.J. Ellman & M. Moskowitz.Northvale, NJ: Aronson, pp. 111—128.
47.
——— (1999). Playing one's cards face up in analysis: An approach to the problem of self-disclosure. Psychoanalytic Quarterly68:521—539.
48.
——— (2000). Subjectivity and the unconscious. Journal of Analytical Psychology45:3—20.
49.
Róheim, G. (1950). Psychoanalysis and Anthropology. New York: International Universities Press.
50.
Rosenblum, S. (1998). Abstinence, anonymity and the avoidance of self-disclosure . Psychoanalytic Inquiry18:538—549.
51.
Shill, M.A. (in press). Signal anxiety, defense, and the pleasure principle. Psychoanalytic Psychology.
52.
Stein, M.H. (1966). Self-observation, reality and the superego. In Psychoanalysis—A General Psychology: Essays in Honor of Heinz Hartmann, ed. R.M. Loewenstein, L.M. Newman, M. Schur , & A.J. Solnit.New York: International Universities Press, pp. 275—297.
53.
Wallerstein R.S. (1992). One psychoanalysis or many? In The Common Ground of Psychoanalysis, ed. R.S. Wallerstein.Northvale, NJ: Aronson, pp. 25—60.
