Psychoanalytically informed interview techniques and interview analysis can yield useful psychoanalytic insights about a particular research subject within the space of a few interviews. Basic hermeneutic principles, often used to understand the research interview, are not sufficient for understanding unconscious meaning and intrapsychic processes; they pay little attention to the particular theoretical and technical aspects of the interview needed to create the best conditions for understanding unconscious meaning. The portability of psychoanalytic concepts and their applicability outside the therapeutic setting are considered, after which four epistemological principles are outlined, derived mainly from the narrative tradition in psychoanalysis, that can inform interview technique and the analysis of the interview. Careful attention to feeling states, the search for core narratives, and the exploration of identifications and object relations are isolated as key analytic tasks in the interview analysis. A brief verbatim interview is used to illustrate this process, and methods are suggested to prevent the “wild analysis” of the interview encounter.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alasuutari, P. (1997). The discursive construction of the personality . In The Narrative Study of Lives: Vol 5, ed. A. Lieblich & R. Josselson.London: Sage Publications.
2.
Barclay, M.W. (1993). The adequacy of hermeneutics in psychoanalysis and psychology. The HumanistPsychologist21:80—93.
3.
Barends, A., Westen, D., Byers, B., Leigh, J., & Silbert, D. (1990). Assessing affect-tone of relationship paradigms from TAT and interview data. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology2:329—332.
4.
Beland, H. (1994). Validation in the clinical process: Four settings for objectification of the subjectivity of understanding. International Journal of Psychoanalysis75:1141—1158.
5.
Bion, W.R. (1962). Elements of Psycho-Analysis. London: Heinemann.
6.
Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (1992). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
Bolognini, S. (1997). Empathy and `empathism'. International Journal of Psychoanalysis78:279—293.
8.
Bucci, W. (1985). Dual coding: A cognitive model for psychoanalytic research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association33:571— 608.
9.
Cartwright, D. (1997). Some aspects of countertransference disclosure . Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy in South Africa5:2—23.
10.
——— (1998). Patient receptivity and projective identification . British Journal of Psychotherapy15:3—18.
11.
Chessick, R.D. (1990). Hermeneutics for psychotherapists. American Journal of Psychotherapy44:256—273.
12.
Connelly, F.M., & Clandinin, D.J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher19:2—14.
Dey, I. ( 1993). Qualitative Data Analysis: A User-Friendly Guide for Social Scientists. London: Routledge .
15.
Edwards, D.J.A. (1993). The study of cases: The foundation of theory and practice in human science. Unpublished manuscript, Rhodes University.
16.
Emde, R.N., & Fonagy, P. (1997). An emerging culture of psychoanalytic research . International Journal of Psychoanalysis78:643—651.
17.
Ferenczi, S. (1919). On the technique of psycho-analysis. In Further Contributions in the Theory and Technique of Psycho-analysis . London: Hogarth Press, 1950, pp. 177—189.
18.
Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. Standard Edition19:12—66.
19.
Gabbard, G.O. (1995). Countertransference: The emerging common ground . International Journal of Psychoanalysis76:475—486.
20.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Hermeneutics and social science. Cultural Hermeneutics2:307—316.
21.
Gill, M.M. (1979). The analysis of transference. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association27:256—273.
22.
Grünbaum, A. (1984). The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
Habermas, J. (1973). Theory and Practice. Boston : Beacon Press.
24.
Hanly, C. (1992). The Problem of Truth in Applied Psychoanalysis . London: Guilford Press.
25.
Heimann, P. (1950). On Countertransference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis31:81—84.
26.
Hopkins, J. (1988). Epistemology and depth psychology: Critical notes on the foundations of psychoanalysis. In Mind, Psychoanalysis and Science, ed. P. Clark & C. Wright.London: Basil Blackwell .
27.
Hunt, J.H. (1989). Psychoanalytic Aspects of Fieldwork. London: Sage Publications.
28.
Hutchinson, S., & Wilson, H. (1994). Research and therapeutic interviews: A poststructuralist perspective. In Critical Issues In Qualitative Research Methods , ed. J.M. Morse.London: Sage Publications.
29.
Ivey, A.E. (1994). Intentional Interviewing and Counselling. London: Brook/Cole.
30.
Kernberg, O.F. (1981). Structural interviewing. Psychiatric Clinics of North America4:169—195.
31.
Kirshner, L.A. (1998). Challenges facing today's psychoanalytic practice . International Journal of Psychoanalysis79:595—598.
32.
Kracke, W.H. (1981). Kagwahiv mourning: Dreams of a bereaved father . Ethos9:258—275.
Kvale, S. (1990). The qualitative research interview. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology32:171—195.
35.
Langs, R. (1982). Psychotherapy: A Basic Text. New York: Aronson.
36.
Luborsky, L., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1990). Understanding Transference: The Core Conflictual Relationship Theme Method. New York : Basic Books.
37.
Main, M., & Goldwyn, R. (1984). Predicting rejection of her infant from mother's representations of her own experiences: A preliminary report. International Journal of Child Abuse and Neglect8:203—217.
38.
May, K.A. (1994). Abstract knowing: The case of magic in method . In Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods, ed. J.M. Morse.London: Sage Publications.
39.
Mellard, J.M. (1991). Using Lacan, Reading Fiction. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
40.
Mishler, E.G.( 1986). Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. London: Harvard University Press.
41.
Morrison, J. (1995). The First Interview. London : Guilford Press.
42.
Morse, J.M., ED. (1994). Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. London : Sage Publications.
43.
Ottenberg, S. (1988). Oedipus, gender and social solidarity: A case study of male childhood and initiation. Ethos16:326—352
44.
Packer, M.J., & Addision, R.B., EDS. (1989). Entering the Circle: Hermeneutic Investigation in Psychology. New York: SUNY Press.
45.
Renik, O. (1998). The analyst's subjectivity and the analyst's objectivity . International Journal of Psychoanalysis79:487—498.
46.
Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and theHuman Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Rosenwald, G.C., & Wiener, W.J. (1993). A moment's monument: The psychology of keeping a diary. In The Narrative Study of Lives: Vol 1, ed. A. Lieblich & R. Josselson.London: Sage Publications.
Sass, L.A. (1992). The epic of disbelief: The postmodernist turn in contemporary psychoanalysis. In Psychology and Postmodernism, ed. S. Kvale. London: Sage Publications .
50.
Schachter, J., & Luborsky L. (1998). Who's afraid of psychoanalytic research? Analysts' attitudes towards reading clinical versus empirical research papers. International Journal of Psychoanalysis79:965—970.
51.
Schafer, R. (1976). A New Language for Psychoanalysis. London: Yale University Press.
52.
——— (1980). Narrative Actions in Psychoanalysis. Worcester: Clark University Press.
53.
——— (1989a). Narratives of the self. In Psychoanalysis: Toward the Second Century, ed. A..M. Cooper , O.F. Kernberg, & E.S. Person.New York: Yale University Press.
54.
——— (1989b). The sense of an answer: Ambiguities of interpretation in clinical and applied psychoanalysis. In The Future of Literary Theory, ed. R. Cohen.London: Routledge.
55.
——— (1989c). Wild analysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association33:275—300.
56.
Segal, H. (1978). On symbolism. International Journal of Psychoanalysis59:315—319.
57.
Sekoff, J. (1994). Blue Velvet: The surface of suffering. Free Associations4:421—446.
58.
Sherwood, M. (1969). The Language and Explanation of Psychoanalysis . New York: Academic Press.
59.
Shevrin, H. (1995). In psychoanalysis one science, two sciences, or no science at all? A discourse among friendly antagonists. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association43:963—986.
60.
——— Williams, W.J., Marshall, R.E., Hertel, R.K., Bond, J.A., & Brakel, L.A. (1992). Event-related potential indicators of the dynamic unconscious. Consciousness and Cognition1:340—366.
61.
Slakter, E., ED. (1987). Countertransference . London: Aronson.
62.
Spence, D.P. (1982). Narrative Truth and Historical Truth. New York: Norton.
63.
——— (1987). Turning happenings into meanings: The central role of the self. In The Book of the Self: Person, Present and Process, ed. P. Young-Eisendrath & J.A. Hall.New York : New York University Press.
64.
——— (1998). Rain or mud field. International Journal of Psychoanalysis79:643—647.
65.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory, Procedures and Techniques. London: Sage Publications.
66.
Strenger, C. (1991). Between Hermeneutics and Science: An Essay on the Epistemology of Psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
67.
Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools. London: Falmer Press.
68.
Thomä, H., & Kächele, H. (1975). Metascience and methodology in clinical psychoanalytic research. Annual ofPsychoanalysis3:49—122.
69.
Westen, D. (1991). Clinical assessment of object relations using the TAT. Journal of Personality Assessment56:56—74.
70.
Winnicott, D. (1949). Hate in the countertransference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis30:69—74.
71.
Wyatt, F. (1986). The narrative in psychoanalysis: Psychoanalytic notes on storytelling, listening, and interpreting. In Narrative Psychology, ed. R. Sarbin. London: Praeger.
