Reading can at times engage one emotionally and entail inner psychological experiences in ways akin to those in clinical psychoanalysis. In that light, after a general introduction regarding the import of reading, attention is turned to Proust, Freud's literary complement, as an exemplary instance to illustrate those similarities. Ideas of Proust on reading are followed by thoughts on reading Proust, with the ending of Proust's masterpiece used to illustrate a parallel to termination in clinical psychoanalytic experience.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aciman, A. (2002). Proust regained. New York Review of Books, July 18, pp. 55—61.
2.
Auden, W.H. (1939). In memory of Sigmund Freud. In Collected Papers. New York: Random House, 1979, pp. 215—218.
3.
Bate, W.J., & Strauss, A.B., Eds. (1969). Samuel Johnson: The Rambler, vol. 2. New Haven : Yale University Press.
4.
Freud, S. (1919). Lines of advance in psycho-analytic therapy. Standard Edition17:157—168.
5.
Hanly, C. (2003). On fictional truth. Unpublished paper.
6.
Holland, N. (1968). The Dynamics of Literary Response. New York: Columbia University Press, 1989.
7.
——— (1975). 5 Readers Reading. New Haven : Yale University Press.
8.
Proust, M. (1913—1927). Remembrance of Things Past, 3 vols., transl. C.K. Scott-Moncrieff & T. Kilmartin. New York: Random House , 1981. ——— (1905). On Reading. London: Penguin , 1994.
9.
Scholem, G. (2002). A Life in Letters, 1914—1982. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
10.
Shattuck, R. (2000). Proust's Way: A Field Guide to In Search of Lost Time. New York: Norton.
11.
Shengold, L. (1991). “Father, Don't You See I'm Burning?” New Haven: Yale University Press.
12.
Sterba R. (1934). The fate of the ego in analytic therapy. International Journal of Psychoanalysis15:117—126.
13.
White, E. (1999). Marcel Proust. New York: Viking.
