The author contends that the pregnant body—the premier icon of the mature female body—has vanished from our psychoanalytic theory of female development. Until we are able to restore this missing entity on a par with the phallus, the developmental theory for both sexes remains fixated in phallocentricism. The author traces some of the evidence for this claim in a brief overview of the literature, a study of the relevant aspects of the case of Little Hans, and a look at the history of medical teaching, in particular illustrations from the first dissections of female bodies in the sixteenth century, which demonstrate a view of the female body as essentially male. A puzzle remains about the marked tendencies that both males and females had, and still have, to distort the female body image. The author offers a clinical example, and the suggestion that the plasticity of the female form in all its developmental phases may underlie the paradoxical requirement that stable mental representations be established upon an elusive set of shifting images.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adelman, J. (1999). Making defect perfection: Shakespeare and the one-sex model. In Enacting Gender on the English Renaissance Stage, ed. V. Comensoli & A. Russell.Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 23—53.
2.
Balsam, R. (1994). Rational and irrational: Remarks on the clinical gendering of language in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child49:145—159.
3.
——— (1996). The pregnant mother and the body image of the daughter. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association44(Suppl.):401— 427.
4.
——— (2000). The mother within the mother. Psychoanalytic Quarterly69:465—493.
5.
——— (2001). Integrating male and female elements in a woman's gender identity. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association49:1335—1358.
6.
Bell, R. (1999). How to Do It: Guides to Good Living for Renaissance Italians. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Bernstein, D. (1990). Female genital anxieties, conflicts and typical mastery modes. International Journal of Psychoanalysis71:151—165.
8.
Bordo, S. (1999). Feminism, Foucault, and the politics of the body . In Feminist Theory and the Body: A Reader, ed. M. Shildrick & J. PriceNew York: Routledge, pp. 246—258.
9.
Butler, J. (1999). Bodies that matter. In Feminist Theory and the Body: A Reader, ed. M. Shildrick & J. PriceNew York: Routledge, pp. 235—246.
10.
Chehrazi, S. (1986). Female psychology: A review. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association34:141—162.
11.
Chodorow, N. (1978). The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
——— (1994). Femininities, Masculinities, Sexualities: Freud and Beyond. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
13.
Deutsch, H. (1944/1945). The Psychology of Women, vol. 2. New York: Grune & Stratton.
14.
Dorsey, D. (1996). Castration anxiety or feminine genital anxiety?Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association44(Suppl.):283—303.
15.
Elise, D. (1997). Primary femininity, bisexuality, and the female ego ideal: A re-examination of female developmental theory. Psychoanalytic Quarterly66:489—517.
16.
Frankiel, R. (1992). Analyzed and unanalyzed themes in the treatment of Little Hans. International Review of Psychoanalysis19:323—333.
17.
Freud, S. (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. Standard Edition7:135—243.
18.
——— (1909). Analysis of a phobia in a five-year-old boy. Standard Edition10:3—149.
19.
——— (1918). The taboo of virginity. Standard Edition11:192—208. ——— (1923). The ego and the id. Standard Edition19:3—66.
20.
Gay, P. ( 1988). Freud: A Life for Our Time. New York : Norton.
Kemp, M., & Wallace, M. (2000). Spectacular Bodies: The Art and Science of the Human Body from Leonardo to Now. Hayward Gallery: London andUniversity of California Press: Berkeley.
23.
King, P., & Steiner, R. (1990). The Freud-Klein Controversies in the British Psycho-Analytical Society, 1941—1945. London: Routledge .
24.
Laqueur, T. (1990). Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
25.
Matthews, S., & Wexler, L. (2000). Pregnant Pictures. New York : Routledge.
26.
Newton, P. (1995). Freud: From Youthful Dream to Mid-Life Crisis . New York: Guilford Press.
27.
Notman, M. (1996). Some observations on the female body image. Paper presented to the Western New England Society for Psychoanalysis .
28.
Nuland, S. (2000). Leonardo da Vinci. New York : Viking.
29.
Richards, A.K. (1999). Freud and Feminism: A Critical Appraisal. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association47:1213—1239.
30.
Ross, J.M. (1987). The riddle of Little Hans. Paper presented to the Western New England Society for Psychoanalysis.
31.
Sayers, J. (1989). Melanie Klein and mothering: A feminist perspective . International Review of Psychoanalysis16:363—376.
32.
Schuker, E., & Levinson, N., Eds. (1991). Female Psychology: An Annotated Psychoanalytic Bibliography. Hillsdale, NJ : Analytic Press.
33.
——— & Shwetz, M. (1991). Pregnancy and motherhood. In Female Psychology: An Annotated Psychoanalytic Bibliography, ed. E. Schuker & N. Levinson.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press , pp. 239—273.
34.
Shaw, R. (1995). Female genital anxities: An integration of new and old. Journal of Clinical Psychoanalysis57:311—313.
35.
Silverman, M. (1980). A fresh look at the case of Little Hans. In Freud and His Patients, ed. M. Kanzer & J. Glenn. New York: Aronson, pp. 95—120.
36.
Stoller, R. (1968). Sex and Gender. New York: Science House.
37.
——— (1985). Presentations of Gender. New Haven: Yale University Press. Tyson, P., & Tyson, R. (1990). Psychoanalytic Theories of Development: An Integration . New Haven: Yale University Press .
38.
Weisner-Hanks, M. (1999). Introduction. In My Gracious Silence: Women in the Mirror of 16th Century Printing, ed. A. Erdman.Lucerne: Gilofer & Ranschburg, pp. vii—xxv.
