An example of the psychoanalytic mode of thought is put forward concerning how psychoanalytic theories have historically been constituted and transformed. The model of world hypotheses, characterized by multiple irresolvable truth claims, captures the nature of most psychoanalytic theorizing until about 1970. Each of two world hypotheses—one grounded in intrapsychic conflict (seen when the analyst observes from outside the transference) and the other in interpersonal internalization (seen when the analyst observes from inside the bidirectional interactive processes)—is an autonomous and self-sufficient aggregate. The stance taken by the analyst-observer with respect to the analytic interaction is key to seeing how the two world hypotheses are made manifest in clinical work and in theory. By contrast, the model of competing programs captures the essential nature of most psychoanalytic theorizing since about 1970, and is characterized by the necessity of each progressively evolving through a particular kind of commerce with its neighbors. Such commerce is necessary when a program is in danger of degenerating. In this way of thinking, there is a fundamental tension between classical psychoanalysis adapting to the demands and exigencies of its particular and ever evolving historical niche and simultaneously retaining the core commitments that guarantee continuity. Honoring the forces of progression displaces the quest for truth as a paramount goal of psychoanalysis. A developmental lag in recognizing this transformation has hindered progress toward a comparative, process-centered psychoanalysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Balsam, R. (2002). Integrating male and female elements in a woman's gender identity. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association49:1335—1360.
2.
Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. (2002). Infant Research and Adult Treatment: Co-Constructing Interactions. HIllsdale, NJAnalytic Press.
3.
Black, M. (1962). Models and Metaphors. Ithaca : Cornell University Press.
4.
Boesky, D. (1991). The psychoanalytic process and its components . Psychoanalytic. Quarterly59:550—584.
5.
Brenner, C. (1982). The Mind in Conflict. New York : International Universities Press.
6.
Bromberg, P. (1994). “Speak! That I may see you”: Some reflections on dissociation, reality, and psychoanalytic listening. Psychoanalytic Dialogues4:517—548.
7.
Cavell, M. (1993). The Psychoanalytic Mind: From Freud to Philosophy . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
8.
Davidson, D. (2000). On truth. In Whose Freud? The Place of Psychoanalysis in Contemporary Culture, ed. P. Brooks & A. Weoloch.New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 300—303.
9.
Eagle, M., Wolitsky, D., & Wakefield, J. (2001). The analyst's knowledge and authority. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association49:457—490.
10.
Edelman, G., & Tononi, G. (2000). A Universe of Consciousness: How Matter Becomes Imagination. New York: Basic Books .
11.
Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. Standard Edition4/5.
12.
——— (1912—1913). Totem and taboo. Standard Edition13:1—161.
13.
——— (1915). The unconscious. Standard Edition14:166—215.
14.
——— (1923). The ego and the id. Standard Edition19:3—66.
15.
——— (1927). The future of an illusion. Standard Edition21:5—56.
16.
Friedman, L. (1997). Ferrum, ignis, and medicina: Return to the crucible . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association45:1—35.
17.
Gholson, B., & Parker, P. (1985). Kuhn, Lakatos, and Laudan: Applications in the history of physics and psychology. American Psychologist40:755—769.
18.
Gray, P. (1982). “Developmental lag” in the evolution of technique for psychoanalysis of neurotic conflict. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association30:621—655.
19.
——— (1987). On the technique of analysis of the superego: An introduction. Psychoanalytic Quarterly61:130—154.
20.
Grossman, W. (1993). Hierarchies, boundaries, and representation in a Freudian model of mental organization. In Hierarchical Concepts in Psychoanalysis, ed. A. Wilson & J. Gedo.New York : Guilford Press, pp. 170—202.
21.
——— (1998). Freud's presentation of “the psychoanalytic mode of thought” in Totem and Taboo and his technical papers. International Journal of Psychoanalysis79:469—486.
22.
Hull, D. (1988). Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
23.
Kadvany, J. (1999). The extraterritoriality of Imre Lakatos: A conversation with Janos Kadvany. In Paranoia within Reason, ed. G. Marcus.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 39—64.
24.
——— (2001). Imre Lakatos and the Guises of Reason. Durham: Duke University Press.
25.
Kitcher, P. (1992). Freud's Dream. Cambridge: MIT Press.
26.
Kohut, H. (1977). The Restoration of the Self. New York: International Universities Press.
27.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
29.
Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and Refutations, ed. J. Worrall & E. Zahar.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
——— (1978). Philosophical Papers, ed. J. Worrall & G. Currie. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
——— & Musgrave, A., EDS. (1970). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
32.
Laudan, L. (1984). Science and Values. Berkeley : University of California Press.
33.
——— (1990). Science and Relativism. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
34.
——— (1996). Beyond Positivism and Relativism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
35.
Leahey, T. (1992). The mythical revolutions of American psychology . American Psychologist47:308—318.
36.
Meissner, W. (1981). Internalization in Psychoanalysis. Psychological Issues Monograph 50. New York: International Universities Press.
37.
Messer, S., & Winokur, M. (1980). Psychoanalysis and behavior therapy: Limits to their integration. American Psychologist35:818—827.
38.
Mitchell, S. (1988). Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis: An Integration . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
39.
Nagel, T. (1986). The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
O'Donahue, W. (1993). The spell of Kuhn on psychology: An exegetical elixir. Philosophical Psychology6:267—287.
41.
Overton, W. (1994). The arrow of time and cycles of time: Concepts of change, cognition, and embodiment. Psychological Inquiry5:215—237.
42.
——— (1998). Developmental psychology: Philosophy, concepts, and methodology. In Theoretical Models of Human Development , ed. R.M. Lerner.New York: Wiley, pp. 107—188.
43.
Pepper, S. (1942). World Hypotheses. Berkeley : University of California Press.
44.
Rorty, R. (1998). Truth and Progress. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
45.
Schafer, R. (1968). Aspects of Internalization. New York: International Universities Press.
46.
——— (1970). The psychoanalytic vision of reality. International Journal of Psychoanalysis51:279—297.
47.
Searle, J. (1992). The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
48.
Spence, D. (1982). Narrative and Historical Truth. New York: Norton.
49.
Spezzano, C. (1998). The triangle of clinical judgment. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association46:365—388.
50.
Stern, D. (1997). Unformulated Experience: From Dissociation to Imagination in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
51.
Strenger, C. (1991). Between Hermeneutics and Science. New York: International Universities Press.
52.
Waelder, R. (1962). Psychoanalysis, scientific method, and philosophy . In Psychoanalysis: Observation, Theory, Application. New York: International Universities Pres, pp. 248—272.
53.
Weinberg, S. (1998). The revolution that didn't happen. New York Review of Books, October8, pp. 48—52.
54.
Wertsch, J. (1990). Voices of the Mind. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
55.
Wilson, A. (1999). Analyzability redux: From “analyzable” to “preparable for analysis.” Annual of Psychoanalysis37:127—141.
56.
——— & Prillaman, J. (1997). Early development and disorders of internalization . In The Neurobiological and Developmental Basis for Psychotherapeutic Intervention, ed. M. Moskowitz, C. Monk, C. Kaye , & S. Ellman.Northvale, NJ: Aronson, pp. 189—234.
57.
——— & Weinstein ( 1992). Language and the psychoanalytic process: Psychoanalysis and Vygotskian psychology, part II. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association40:725—759.
