Analysts Who Commit Sexual Boundary Violations: a Lost Cause?

Abstract

The causes of sexual misconduct by analysts are discussed, as is the viability of rehabilitation for different types of transgressors. Common misunderstandings about the transgressor (such as the assumption of psychopathy and the likelihood of multiple offenses) are countered with a summary of data derived from the evaluation and/or treatment of over two hundred cases, most of them one-time transgressors. The typical characteristics of the analyst or therapist who engages in sexual misconduct are presented and discussed as qualities that are to some extent present in analysts generally. The temptation to deny this universal vulnerability is viewed as effectively replicating the kind of vertical splitting or compartmentalization that makes one vulnerable to sexual misconduct in the first place.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Apfel, R.J. , & Simon, B. (1985). Patient-therapist sexual contact: I. Psychodynamic perspectives on the causes and results. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 43:57—62.

Celenza, A. (1991). The misuse of countertransference love in cases of sexual intimacies between therapists and patients. Psychoanalytic Psychology 8:501—509.

——— (1995). Love and hate in the countertransference. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice 32:301—307.

——— (1998). Precursors to sexual misconduct: Preliminary findings . Psychoanalytic Psychology 15:378—395.

——— & Hilsenroth, M. (1997). A Rorschach investigation of sexualized dual relationships. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 61:1—20.

Coen, S. (1992). The Misuse of Persons: Analyzing Pathological Dependency. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

Eyman, J.R. , & Gabbard, G.O. (1991). Will therapist-patient sex prevent suicide? Psychiatric Annals 21:669—674.

Gabbard, G.O. (1995). The early history of boundary violations. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 43:1115—1136.

——— (1996). Love and Hate in the Analytic Relationship. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.

10.

——— (1997). Challenges in the analysis of adults who were sexually abused as children. Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis 5:1—25.

11.

——— & Lester, E. (1995). Boundaries and Boundary Violations in Psychoanalysis . New York: Basic Books.

12.

——— & Peltz, M. (2001). Speaking the unspeakable: Institutional reactions to boundary violations by training analysts. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 49:659—673.

13.

Gartrell, N. , Herman, J. , Olarte, S. , Feldstein, M. , & Localio, R. (1987). Reporting practices of psychiatrists who knew of sexual misconduct by colleagues. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 57:287—295.

14.

Gutheil, T.G. , & Gabbard, G.O. (1992). Obstacles to the dynamic understanding of therapist-patient sexual relations. American Journal of Psychotherapy 56:515—525.

15.

Holroyd, J. , & Brodsky, A. (1977). Psychologists' attitudes and practices regarding erotic and nonerotic physical contact with patients. American Psychologist 32:843—849.

16.

Maltsberger, J.T. , & Buie, D.H. (1974). Countertransference hate in the treatment of suicidal patients. Archives of General Psychiatry 30:625—633.

17.

Schoener, G.R. (1995). Assessment of professionals who have engaged in boundary violations. Psychiatric Annals 25:95—99.

18.

——— Milgrom, J.H. , Gonsiorek, J.C. , Luepker, E.T. , & Conroe, R.M. (1989). Psychotherapists' Sexual Involvement with Clients: Intervention and Prevention. Minneapolis: Walk-In Counseling Center.

19.

Twemlow, S.W. , & Gabbard, G.O. (1989). The lovesick therapist. In Sexual Exploitation in Professional Relationships, ed. G.O. Gabbard. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, pp. 71—87.