The ways in which the analyst's desire for particular experiences with patients is inevitable and often leads to narcissistically based resistances are considered. Five propositions are examined: (1) that the analyst cannot help but have desires and want them recognized by the analysand; (2) that these desires frequently underwrite the analyst's theoretical beliefs and technical interventions; (3) that narcissistic desires and their influence are ubiquitous among practicing analysts; (4) that the patient is often on the lookout for the analyst's various agendas; and (5) that the patient often hopes the analyst will put his or her desire aside and listen so the patient can further his or her own interests. Lacan's concept of the “dual relation” is central to this discussion. The neo-Kleinian position on narcissistic resistances is explored, as is the idea of the “analytic third” as a potential solution to the problem they pose. An extended case description illustrates the main points.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Almond, R. (1995). The analytic role. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association43:469—494.
2.
Aron, L. (1996). A Meeting of Minds. Hillsdale : Analytic Press.
3.
Bader, M.J. (1993). The analyst's use of humor. Psychoanalytic Quarterly62:23—51.
4.
——— (1995). Authenticity and the psychology of choice in the analyst. Psychoanalytic Quarterly64:282—305.
5.
Boesky, D. (1990). The psychoanalytic process and its components . Psychoanalytic Quarterly59: 550—584.
6.
Caper, R. (1997). A mind of one's own. International Journal of Psychoanalysis78:265—278.
7.
——— (2001). The goals of clinical psychoanalysis: Notes on interpretation and psychological development. Psychoanalytic Quarterly70:99—116.
8.
Chused, J. (1996). The therapeutic action of psychoanalysis: Abstinence and informative experience. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association44:1047—1071.
9.
Coen, S. (1998). Perverse defenses in neurotic patients. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association46:1169—1194.
10.
Cooper, S.H. (1996). Facts all come with a point of view. International Journal of Psychoanalysis77:255—273.
11.
Friedman, L. (1993). Discussion, panel on resistance in clinical practice . American Psychoanalytic Association Annual Meeting , San Francisco, May.
12.
Fukuyama, F. (1992). In the beginning, a battle to the death for pure prestige. In The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press, pp. 143—152.
13.
Gabbard, G.O. (2000). On gratitude and gratification. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association48:697—716.
14.
Goldberg, A. (1987). Psychoanalysis and negotiation. Psychoanalytic Quarterly56:109—129.
15.
Green, A. (1975). The analyst, symbolization and absence in the analytic setting (On changes in analytic practice and analytic experience)—In memory of D.W. Winnicott. International Journal of Psychoanalysis56:1—22.
16.
Greenberg, J. (1995). Psychoanalytic technique and the interactive matrix . Psychoanalytic Quarterly64:1—22.
17.
Grossman, L. (1996). The analyst's influence. Psychoanalytic Quarterly65:681—692.
18.
——— (1999). What the analyst does not hear. Psychoanalytic Quarterly68:84—98.
19.
Grusky, Z. (1999). Conviction and conversion: The role of shared fantasies about analysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly68:401—430.
20.
Hartmann, H. (1950). Comments on the psychoanalytic theory of the ego . Psychoanalytic Study of the Child5:74—96.
21.
Hoffman, I.Z. (1983). The patient as interpreter of the analyst's experience . Contemporary Psychoanalysis19:389—422.
22.
——— (1994). Dialectical thinking and therapeutic action in the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Quarterly63:187—218.
23.
Jacobs, T.J. (1991). The Use of the Self: Countertransference and Communication in the Analytic Setting. New York: International Universities Press.
24.
Jones, E.E. (2000). Therapeutic Action: A Guide to Psychoanalytic Therapy. Northvale, NJ: Aronson .
25.
Joseph, B. (1971). A clinical contribution to the analysis of perversion . International Journal of Psychoanalysis52:441—449.
26.
——— (1989). Psychic Equilibrium and Psychic Change: Selected Papers of Betty Joseph, ed. M. Feldman & E.B. Spillius.London : Routledge.
27.
——— (2000). Agreeableness as obstacle. International Journal of Psychoanalysis81:641—649.
28.
Kantrowitz, J.L. (1993). Impasses in psychoanalysis: Overcoming resistances in situations of stalemate. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association41:1021—1050.
29.
Kennedy, R. (2000). Becoming a subject: Some theoretical and clinical issues. International Journal of Psychoanalysis81:875—892.
30.
Kirshner, L.A. (1999). A postmodern realism for analysts. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association47:445—463.
31.
Kojeve, A. (1947). Introduction to the Reading of Hegel, transl. J.H. Nichols, Jr. New York: Basic Books, 1969.
32.
Lacan, J. (1977a). The function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis. In Ecrits: A Selection, transl. A. Sheridan. London : Tavistock, pp. 30—113.
33.
——— (1977b). The mirror stage as the formative function of the I as it is revealed in psychoanalytic experience. In Ecrits: A Selection, transl. A. Sheridan. New York: Norton, pp. 1—7.
34.
——— (1981). The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis , ed. J-A Miller, transl. A. Sheridan. New York: Norton.
35.
——— (1988). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book II: The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis, ed. J-A Miller, transl. S. Tomaselli. New York: Norton.
36.
——— (1992). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book VII: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959—1960, ed. J-A Miller, transl. D. Porter. New York: Norton.
37.
——— (1993). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book III: The Psychoses, 1955—1956, ed. J-A Miller, transl. R. Grigg. New York: Norton. Laplanche, J. (2000). Essays on Otherness. London : Routledge.
38.
——— & Pontalis, J-B. (1973). The Language of Psychoanalysis, transl. D. Nicholson-Smith. New York: Norton.
39.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1958). Structural Anthropology, transl. C. Jacobson & B. G. Schoepf. New York: Basic Books , 1963.
Maldonado, J.L. (1999). Narcissistic resistances in the analytic experience . International Journal of Psychoanalysis80:1131—1146.
42.
Marcus, G. (1998). Invisible Republic: Bob Dylan's Basement Tapes . New York: Henry Holt.
43.
Mclaughlin, J.T. (1991). Clinical and theoretical aspects of enactment . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association39:595—614.
44.
Muller, J.P. (1995). The ego and mirroring in the dyad. In Beyond the Psychoanalytic Dyad: Developmental Semiotics in Freud, Peirce, and Lacan. New York: Routledge , pp. 120—133.
45.
Ogden, T.H. (1988). Misrecognitions and the fear of not knowing. Psychoanalytic Quarterly57:643—666.
46.
——— (1994). The analytic third: Working intersubjectively with clinical facts. International Journal of Psychoanalysis75:3—19.
47.
Opatow, B. (1989). Drive theory and the metapsychology of experience . International Journal of Psychoanalysis70:645—660.
48.
——— (1997). The real unconscious: Psychoanalysis as a theory of consciousness. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association45:865—890.
49.
Pizer, S. (1992). The negotiation of paradox in the analytic process . Psychoanalytic Dialogues2:215—240.
50.
Poland, W.S. (2000). The analyst's witnessing and otherness. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association48:18—34.
51.
Pontalis, J-B. (1977). The birth and recognition of the “self.” In Frontiers in Psychoanalysis: Between the Dream and Psychic Pain, transl. C.P. Cullen. New York: International Universities Press, 1981, pp. 133—138.
52.
Purcell, S. (2001). Countertransference and the analysis of narcissistic resistances: Effects of the analyst's theory. Unpublished manuscript.
53.
Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature36:11—46.
54.
——— (1999). First impressions matter: A model of confirmatory bias. Quarterly Journal of Economics114:37—82.
55.
Renik, O. (1993a). Analytic interaction: Conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst's irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanalytic Quarterly62:553—571.
56.
——— (1993b). Countertransference enactment and the psychoanalytic process. In Psychic Structure and Psychic Change: Essays in Honor of Robert Wallerstein, M.D., ed. M.J. Horowitz, O.F. Kernberg, & E.M. Weinshel.Madison, CT: International Universities Press, pp. 135—158.
57.
———, ED. (1996). Knowledge and Authority in the Psychoanalytic Relationship. Psychoanalytic Quarterly65(1).
58.
Rothstein, A. (1999). Some implications of the analyst feeling disturbed when working with disturbed patients. Psychoanalytic Quarterly68:541—558.
59.
Sandler, J. (1976). Countertransference and role-responsiveness. International Review of Psychoanalysis3:43—47.
60.
Schafer, R., ED. (1997). The Contemporary Kleinians of London. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
61.
Schwaber, E.A. (1983). Psychoanalytic listening and psychic reality. International Review of Psychoanalysis10:379—392.
62.
——— (1992). Countertransference: The analyst's retreat from the patient's vantage point. International Journal of Psychoanalysis73:349—362.
63.
Sharpe, E.F. (1950). Collected Papers on Psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press.
64.
Smith, H.F. (1995). Analytic listening and the experience of surprise . International Journal of Psychoanalysis76:67—78.
65.
——— (1999). Subjectivity and objectivity in analytic listening . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association47:465—484.
66.
Smith, J.H. (1991). Arguing with Lacan: Ego Psychology and Language . New Haven: Yale University Press .
67.
Steiner, J. (1993). Problems of psychoanalytic technique: Patient-centered and analyst-centered interpretations. In Psychic Retreats: Pathological Organization in Psychotic, Neurotic and Borderline Patients. London: Routledge.
68.
Viederman, M. (1991). The real person of the analyst and his role in the process of psychoanalytic cure. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association39:451—489.
69.
Weiss, J. (1993). How Psychotherapy Works: Process and Technique . New York: Guilford Press.
70.
——— (1995). Bernfeld's “The facts of observation in psychoanalysis”: A response from psychoanalytic research. Psychoanalytic Quarterly64:699—716.
71.
——— Sampson, H., & THE MOUNT ZION PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH GROUP. (1986). The Psychoanalytic Process: Theory, Clinical Observations and Empirical Research . New York: Guilford Press .
72.
Wilson, M. (1998). Otherness within: Aspects of insight in psychoanalysis . Psychoanalytic Quarterly67:54—78.
