The change that occurred during an analytic hour with a seven-year-old girl is explored by means of videotape observation and aspects of developmental theory drawn from the field of infant research. Detailed review of the videotape and transcript of twelve minutes of the analytic hour revealed significant change in the girl's attitude toward the loss represented by a cancelled session. The moment-to-moment process between two points, A and B—identified as representing the beginning and end of the change in the girl's ability to deal with loss in the analytic relationship—is studied and described in two forms: written transcript for the verbal material, and narrative description for the nonverbal material. The methodology is based on observed behaviors but also relies on the clinical experience of the analyst in the interpretation of affects and the recognition of intentions in both participants. The results suggest that, taken as a whole, many such small transitional episodes during the course of a treatment play an important role in the process of therapeutic change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Banse, R., & Scherer, K. (1996). Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology70:614—636.
2.
Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. (2002). Infant Research and Adult Treatment: Co-constructing Interactions. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
3.
Boston Change Process Study Group. (2002). Explicating the implicit: The local level and the microprocess of change in the analytic situation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis83:1051—1062.
4.
——— (in press). The paradox of sloppiness and order in the psychotherapeutic process. International Journal of Psychoanalysis.
5.
Ekman, P. (1994). Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: A reply to Russell's mistaken critique. Psychological Bulletin115:268—287.
6.
Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. (2002). Affect Regulation, Mentalization, and the Development of the Self. New York: Other Press .
7.
Fosha, D. (2001). The dyadic regulation of affect. Journal of Clinical Psychology57(2):1—16.
8.
Freeman, W. (1995). Societies of Brains: A Study in the Neuroscience of Love and Hate. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
——— (1999). How Brains Make Up Their Minds. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
10.
Freud, S. (1905). Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious. Standard Edition8:16—89.
11.
Galati, D., Scherer, K., & Ricci-Bitti, P. (1997). Voluntary facial expression of emotion: Comparing congenitally blind with normally sighted encoders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology73:1363—1379.
12.
Gianino, A., & Tronick, E. (1988). The mutual regulation model: The infant's self and interactive regulation, coping, and defense capacities. In Stress and Coping, ed. T. Field, P. McCabe, & N. Schneiderman.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 47—68.
13.
Izard, C.E. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum.
14.
——— & Malatesta, C.Z. (1987). Perspectives on emotional development: 1. Differential emotions theory of early emotional development . In Handbook of Infant Development, 2nd ed., ed. J.D. Osofsky.New York: Wiley, pp. 494—554.
15.
Lyons-Ruth, K. (1998). Implicit relational knowing: Its role in development and psychoanalytic treatment. Infant Mental Health Journal19:282—291.
16.
Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation19:107—161.
17.
Meltzoff, A.N., & Moore, M.K. (1989). Imitation in newborn infants: Exploring the range of gestures imitated and the underlying mechanisms. Developmental Psychology. 25:954—962.
18.
Murray, L., & Trevarthyn, C. (1985). Emotional regulation of interaction between two-month-olds and their mothers. In Social Perception in Infants, ed. T.M. Fields & N.A. Fox.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19.
Rosenberg, E., Ekman, P., & Blumenthal, J.A. (1998). Facial expression and the affective component of cynical hostility in male coronary heart disease patients . Health Psychology17:376—380.
20.
Sander, L. (1977). The regulation of exchange in the infant-caretaker system and some aspects of the context-content relationship. In Interaction, Conversation, and the Development of Language, ed. M. Lewis & L. Rosenblum.New York: Wiley, pp. 133—156.
21.
——— (1983). Polarity, paradox, and the organizing process in development. In Frontiers of Infant Psychiatry, ed. E. Galenson & R. Tyson.New York: Basic Books , pp. 315—327.
22.
——— (1998). Organizing complexity within the psychoanalytic framework: Toward an integration of emerging knowledge of early development, biological systems, and therapeutic processes. Presentation to Division 39 of the American Psychological Association, April 24.
23.
Scherer, K. (1994). Evidence for universality and cultural variation of differential emotion response patterning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology66:310—328.
24.
Stern, D. (1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant. New York: Basic Books.
25.
——— Sander, L., Nahum, J., Harrison, A., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A., Bruschweiler-Stern, N., & Tronick, E. (1998). Non-interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy: The “something more” than interpretation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis79:903—923.
26.
Tronick, E. (1989). Emotions and emotional communication in infants . American Psychologist44(2):112—119.
27.
——— (1998). Interactions that effect change in psychotherapy: A model based on infant research. Infant Mental Health Journal19:1—290.
28.
——— (2001). Emotional connections and dyadic consciousness in infant-mother and patient-therapist interactions. Psychoanalytic Dialogues11:187—194.
29.
Waldron, S., JR. (1997). How can we study the efficacy of psychoanalysis?Psychoanalytic Quarterly66:283—325.
30.
Weinberg, M.K., & Tronick, E.Z. (1994). Beyond the face: An empirical study of infant affective configurations of facial, vocal, gestural, and regulatory behaviors . Child Development65:1503—1515.
