The problem of self-disclosure is explored in relation to currently shifting paradigms of the nature of the analytic relation and analytic interaction. Relational and intersubjective perspectives emphasize the role of self-disclosure as not merely allowable, but as an essential facilitating aspect of the analytic dialogue, in keeping with the role of the analyst as a contributing partner in the process. At the opposite extreme, advocates of classical anonymity stress the importance of neutrality and abstinence. The paper seeks to chart a course between unconstrained self-disclosure and absolute anonymity, both of which foster misalliances. Self-disclosure is seen as at times contributory to the analytic process, and at times deleterious. The decision whether to self-disclose, what to disclose, and when and how, should be guided by the analyst's perspective on neutrality, conceived as a mental stance in which the analyst assesses and decides what, at any given point, seems to contribute to the analytic process and the patient's therapeutic benefit. The major risk in self-disclosure is the tendency to draw the analytic interaction into the real relation between analyst and patient, thus diminishing or distorting the therapeutic alliance, mitigating transference expression, and compromising therapeutic effectiveness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abend, S.M. (1982). Serious illness in the analyst: Countertransference considerations. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association30:365—375.
2.
Alger, I. (1966). The clinical handling of the analyst's responses . Psychoanalytic Forum1:289—302.
3.
Alonso, A. (1996). Toward a new understanding of neutrality. In Understanding Therapeutic Action: Psychodynamics Concepts of Cure , ed. L.E. Lifson.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 3—19.
4.
Aron, L. (1992). Interpretation as expression of the analyst's subjectivity. Psychoanalytic Dialogues2:475—507.
5.
Bacal, H.A. (1985). Optimal responsiveness and the therapeutic process . In Progress in Self Psychology, vol. 1, ed. A. Goldberg. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 202—227.
6.
——— & Newman, K. (1990). Theories of Object Relations: Bridges to Self Psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.
7.
Berman, L. (1949). Counter-transferences and attitudes of the analyst in the therapeutic process. Psychiatry12:159—166.
8.
Bollas, C. (1987). The Shadow of the Object: Psychoanalysis of the Unthought Known. New York: Columbia University Press.
9.
Broucek, F.J. (1991). Shame and the Self. New York : Guilford Press.
10.
——— & Ricci, W. (1998). Self-disclosure or self presence? Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic62:427—438.
11.
Busch, F. (1998). Self-disclosure ain't what it's cracked up to be, at least not yet. Psychoanalytic Inquiry18:518—529.
12.
Cavell, M. (1998). Triangulation, one's own mind and objectivity . International Journal of Psychoanalysis79:449—467.
13.
Chused, J.F., & Raphling, D.L. (1992). The analyst's mistakes . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association40:89—116.
14.
Cooper, S.H. (1996). Neutrality and psychoanalysis: Separation, divorce, or a new set of vows. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association44:1017—1019.
15.
——— (1998a). Analyst subjectivity, analyst disclosure, and the aims of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly67:379—406.
16.
——— (1998b). Countertransference disclosure and the conceptualization of analytic technique. Psychoanalytic Quarterly67:128—154.
17.
Coyle, B.R. (1999). Practical tools for rural psychiatric practice . Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic63:202—222.
18.
Curtis, H.C. (1979). The concept of therapeutic alliance: Implications for the “widening scope.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association27(Suppl.):159—192.
19.
Davies, J.M. (1994). Love in the afternoon: A relational reconsideration of desire and dread in the countertransference. Psychoanalytic Dialogues4:153—170.
20.
Dewald, P.A. (1982). Serious illness in the analyst: Transference, countertransference and reality responses. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association30:347—363.
21.
Ehrenberg, D.B. (1992). The Intimate Edge. New York : Norton.
22.
——— (1995). Self-disclosure: Therapeutic tool or indulgence ? Contemporary Psychoanalysis31:213—228.
23.
Epstein, L. (1995). Self-disclosure and analytic space: Some issues raised by Jay Greenberg's paper on self-disclosure. Contemporary Psychoanalysis31:229—236.
24.
——— & Feiner, A.H. (1979). Countertransference: The therapist's contribution to treatment. Contemporary Psychoanalysis15:489—513.
25.
Fitzpatrick, K. (1999). Terms of endearment in clinical analysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly68:119—125.
26.
Freud, A. (1936). The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense. Rev. ed. New York: International Universities Press, 1966.
27.
Freud, S. (1912). Recommendations to physicians practicing psychoanalysis . Standard Edition12:109—120.
28.
——— (1915). Observations on transference-love. Standard Edition12:159—171.
29.
Friedman, L. (1997a). Ferrum, ignis, and medicina; Return to the crucible . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association45:21—78.
30.
——— (1997b). Response. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association45:61—78.
31.
Gabbard, G.O., & Lester, E.P. (1996). Boundaries and Boundary Violations in Psychoanalysis . New York: Basic Books.
32.
Gedo, J.E. (1981). Advances in Clinical Psychoanalysis. New York: International Universities Press.
33.
Gill, M.M. (1983). The interpersonal paradigm and the degree of the therapist's involvement. Contemporary Psychoanalysis19:200—237.
34.
Gitelson, M. (1952). The emotional position of the analyst in the psychoanalytic situation. In Psychoanalysis: Science and Profession. New York: International Universities Press , 1973, pp. 173—200.
35.
Goz, R. ( 1975). On knowing the therapist “as a person.” International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy4:437—458.
36.
Greenberg, J., & Mitchell, S. (1983). Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
37.
Greenson, R.R. (1965). The working alliance and the transference neurosis . Psychoanalytic Quarterly34:155—181.
38.
——— (1967). The Technique and Practice of Psychoanalysis. New York: International Universities Press .
39.
——— (1971). The “real” relationship between the patient and the psychoanalyst. In The Unconscious Today, ed. M. Kanzer.New York: International Universities Press, pp. 213—232.
40.
——— (1972). Beyond transference and interpretation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis53:213—217.
41.
——— & Wexler, M. (1969). The non-transference relationship in the psychoanalytic situation. International Journal of Psychooanalysis50:27—39.
42.
Grossman, L. (1999). What the analyst does not hear. Psychoanalytic Quarterly68:84—98.
43.
Gutheil, T.G., & Gabbard, G.O. (1998). Misuses and misunderstandings of boundary theory in clinical and regulatory settings. American Journal of Psychiatry155:409—414.
44.
Hanly, C. (1998). Reflections on the analyst's self-disclosure. Psychoanalytic Inquiry18:550—565.
45.
Hoffman, I.Z. (1983). The patient as interpreter of the analyst's experience . Contemporary Psychoanalysis19:389—422.
46.
——— (1994). Dialectical thinking and therapeutic action in the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Quarterly63:187—218.
47.
——— (1998). Ritual and Spontaneity in the Psychoanalytic Process . Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press .
48.
Hurwitz, M.R. (1986). The analyst, his theory, and the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child41:439—466.
49.
Isay, R.A. (1991). The homosexual analyst: Clinical considerations . Psychoanalytic Study of the Child46:199—216.
50.
Jacobs, T.J. (1995). Discussion of Jay Greenberg's paper. Contemporary Psychoanalysis31: 237—245.
51.
——— (1999). On the question of self-disclosure by the analyst: Error or advance in technique? Psychoanalytic Quarterly68:159—183.
52.
Kantrowitz, J.L. (1999). The role of the preconscious in psychoanalysis . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association47:65—89.
53.
Kanzer, M. (1963). Review of L. Stone's The Psychoanalytic Situation . International Journal of Psychoanalysis44:108—110.
54.
Kernberg, O.F. (1979). Some implications of object relations theory for psychoanalytic technique. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association27(Suppl.):207—240.
55.
——— (1996). The analyst's authority in the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanalytic Quarterly65:137—157.
56.
Kohut, H. (1977). The Restoration of the Self. New York: International Universities Press.
57.
Langs, R. (1976). The Therapeutic Interaction. 2 vols. New York: Aronson.
58.
Leary, K. (1997). Race, self-disclosure, and “forbidden talk”: Race and ethnicity in contemporary clinical practice. Psychoanalytic Quarterly66:163—189.
59.
Levenson, E.A. (1996). Aspects of self-revelation and self-disclosure . Contemporary Psychoanalysis32:237—248.
60.
Levine, H.B. (1997). Difficulties in maintaining an analytic stance in the treatment of adults who were sexually abused as children. Psychoanalytic Inquiry17:312—328.
61.
——— & Friedman, R.J. (2000). Intersubjectivity and interaction in the analytic relationship: A mainstream view. Psychoanalytic Quarterly69:63—92.
62.
Levy, S.T., & Inderbitzin, L.B. (1997). Safety, danger, and the analyst's authority. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association45:377—394.
63.
Lichtenberg, J.D. (1998). Experience as a guide to psychoanalytic theory and practice. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association46:17—34.
64.
Little, M. (1951). Counter-transference and the patient's response to it. International Journal of Psychoanalysis32:32—40.
65.
——— (1982). Direct presentation of reality in areas of delusion . In Technical Factors in the Treatment of the Severely Disturbed Patient, ed. P.L. Giovacchini & L.B. Boyer.New York: Aronson, pp. 169—185.
66.
Loewald, H.W. (1980). Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press.
67.
Lynn, D.J., & Vaillant, G.E. (1998). Anonymity, neutrality, and confidentiality in the actual methods of Sigmund Freud: A review of 43 cases, 1907—1939. American Journal of Psychiatry155:163—171.
68.
Makari, G.J. (1997). Panel report: Current conceptions of neutrality and abstinence. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association45:1231—123.
69.
Marcus, D.M. (1997). On knowing what one knows. Psychoanalytic Quarterly66:219—241.
70.
——— (1998). Self-disclosure: The wrong issue. Psychoanalytic Inquiry18:566—579.
71.
Maroda, K. (1991). The Power of Countertransference. New York: Wiley.
72.
Meissner, W.W. (1992). The concept of the therapeutic alliance. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association40:1059—1087.
73.
——— (1996a). The Therapeutic Alliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
74.
——— (1996b). The therapeutic alliance and the real relationship in the analytic process. In Understanding Therapeutic Action: Psychodynamics Aspects of Cure, ed. L.E. Lifson.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 21—39.
75.
——— (1998). Neutrality, abstinence, and the therapeutic alliance . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association46:1089—1128.
76.
——— (1999a). The self-as-subject in psychoanalysis. I. The nature of subjectivity. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought22:155—201.
77.
——— (1999b). The self-as-subject in psychoanalysis. II. The subject in analysis. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought22:383—428.
78.
——— (2000a). The many faces of analytic interaction. Psychoanalytic Psychology17:512—546.
79.
——— (2000b). Reflections on psychic reality. International Journal of Psychoanalysis81:1117—1138.
80.
——— (2000c). The self-as-relational in psychoanalysis. I. Relational aspects of the self. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought23:177—204.
81.
———( 2000d). The self-as-relational in psychoanalysis. II. The self as related within the analytic process. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought23:205—247.
——— (1998b). Rethinking self-disclosure: An example of the clinical utility of the analyst's self-disclosing activities. Psychoanalytic Inquiry18:580—600.
84.
Mitchell, S. (1988). Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
85.
——— (1993). Hope and Dread in Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
86.
——— (1997). Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
87.
Modell, A.H. (1990). Other Times, Other Realities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
88.
Moore, B.E., & Fine, B.D., EDS. (1990). Psychoanalytic Terms and Concepts. New Haven: Yale University Press.
89.
Novick, J., & Novick, K.K. (2000). Love in the therapeutic alliance. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association48:189—218.
90.
Orange, D.M., & Stolorow, R.D. (1998). Self-disclosure from the perspective of intersubjectivity theory. Psychoanalytic Inquiry18:530—537.
91.
Parsons, M. (1999). The logic of play in psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis80:871—884.
92.
Pizer, B. (1997). When the analyst is ill: Dimensions of self-disclosure . Psychoanalytic Quarterly66:450—469.
93.
Rayner, E. (1992). Matching, attunement and the psychoanalytic dialogue . International Journal of Psychoanalysis73:39—54.
94.
Reich, A. (1960). Further remarks on countertransference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis41:389—395.
95.
Reiser, M.F. (1999). Memory, empathy, and interactive dimensions of psychoanalytic process. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association47:485—501.
96.
Renik, O. (1993). Technique in the light of the analyst's irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanalytic Quarterly62:553—571.
97.
——— (1995). The ideal of the anonymous analyst and the problem of self-disclosure. Psychoanalytic Quarterly64:466—495.
98.
——— (1996). The perils of neutrality. Psychoanalytic Quarterly65:495—517.
99.
——— (1999). Playing one's cards face up in analysis: An approach to the problem of self-disclosure. Psychoanalytic Quarterly68:521—539. Rosenblum , S. (1998). Abstinence, anonymity and the avoidance of self-disclosure. Psychoanalytic Inquiry18:538—549.
100.
Rothstein, A. (1997). Panel report: Turning points in psychoanalysis . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association45:1271—1284.
101.
Schachter, J. (1995). The analyst under stress: Issues of technique . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association43:11—14.
102.
Schafer, R. (1997). Tradition and Change in Psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
103.
Scharfman, M.A. (1989). The therapeutic dyad in the light of infant observational research. In The Significance of Infant Observational Research for Clinical Work with Children, Adolescents, and Adults, ed. S. Dowling & A. Rothstein.Madison, CT: International Universities Press, pp. 53—64.
104.
Schwaber, E.A. (1998). “Traveling affectively alone”: A personal derailment in analytic listening. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association46:1045—1065.
105.
Séchaud, E. (2000). Panel report: Affective self-disclosure by the analyst. International Journal of Psychoanalysis81:164—165.
106.
Shane, M., Shane, E., & Gales, M. (2000). Psychoanalysis unbound: A contextual consideration of boundaries from a developmental systems self psychology perspective. Psychoanalytic Inquiry20:144—159.
107.
Singer, M.H. (1999). Panel report: How central is the analysis of aggression to clinical psychoanalysis? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association47:1179—1189.
108.
Smith, H.F. (1999). Subjectivity and objectivity in analytic listening . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association47:465—484.
109.
Stolorow, R., & Atwood, G. (1992). Contexts of Being: The Intersubjective Foundations of Psychological Life. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
110.
——— ——— (1997). Deconstructing the myth of the neutral analyst: An alternative from intersubjective systems theory. Psychoanalytic Quarterly66:431—449.
111.
——— Brandchaft, B., & Atwood, G. (1987). Psychoanalytic Treatment: An Intersubjective Approach . Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press .
112.
Stone, L. (1954). The widening scope of indications for psychoanalysis . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association2:567—594.
113.
——— (1961). The Psychoanalytic Situation. New York: International Universities Press.
114.
Teicholz, J.G. (1996). Optimal responsiveness: Its role in psychic growth and change. In Understanding Therapeutic Action: Psychodynamic Concepts of Cure, ed. L.E. Lifson.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 139—161.
115.
Treurniet, N. (1997). On an ethic of psychoanalytic technique. Psychoanalytic Quarterly66:596—627.
116.
Viederman, M. (1991). The real person of the analyst and his role in the process of psychoanalytic cure. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association39:451—489.
117.
Wallerstein, R.S. (1998). The new American psychoanalysis: A commentary . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association46:1021—1043.
118.
Wasserman, M.D. (1999). The impact of psychoanalytic theory and a two-person psychology on the empathising analyst. International Journal of Psychoanalysis80:449—464.
119.
Weinstein, L. (1998). Commentaries on Lichtenberg (1998). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association46:67—74.
120.
Zetzel, E.R. (1956). The concept of transference. In The Capacity for Emotional Growth. New York: International Universities Press, 1970, pp. 168—181.
