Freud always defined the primary process metapsychologically, but he described the ways it shows up in dreams, parapraxes, jokes, and symptoms with enough observational detail to make it possible to create an objective, reliable scoring system to measure its manifestations in Rorschach responses, dreams, TAT stories, free associations, and other verbal texts. That system can identify signs of the thinker's efforts, adaptive or maladaptive, to control or defend against the emergence of primary process. A prerequisite and a consequence of the research that used this system was clarification and elaboration of the psychoanalytic theory of thinking. Results of empirical tests of several propositions derived from psychoanalytic theory are summarized. Predictions concerning the method's most useful index, of adaptive vs. maladaptive regression, have been repeatedly verified: People who score high on this index (who are able to produce well-controlled “primary products” in their Rorschach responses), as compared to those who score at the maladaptive pole (producing primary-process-filled responses with poor reality testing, anxiety, and pathological defensive efforts), are better able to tolerate sensory deprivation, are more able to enter special states of consciousness comfortably (drug-induced, hypnotic, etc.), and have higher achievements in artistic creativity, while schizophrenics tend to score at the extreme of maladaptive regression. Capacity for adaptive regression also predicts success in psychotherapy, and rises with the degree of improvement after both psychotherapy and drug treatment. Some predictive failures have been theoretically interesting: Kris's hypothesis about creativity and the controlled use of primary process holds for males but usually not for females. This body of work is presented as a refutation of charges, brought by such critics as Crews, that psychoanalysis cannot become a science.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allison, J. (1967). Adaptive regression and intense religious experiences . Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease145:452—463.
2.
Barr, H.B., Langs, R.J., Holt, R.R., Goldberger, L., & Klein, G.S. (1972). LSD: Personality and Experience. New York: Wiley.
3.
Benfari, R.C., & Calogeras, R.C. (1968). Levels of cognition and conscience typologies. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment32:466—474.
4.
Bennett, R.M. (1973). The effects of alcohol on primary process thinking. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, 1973. Dissertation Abstracts International34(1—B):404.
5.
Bergan, J.R. (1965). Pitch perception, imagery, and regression in the service of the ego. Journal of Research in Music Education13:15—32.
6.
Caprara, G.V., ET AL. (1977). Studi sulla personalità: Quattro richerche con il metodo di R. Holt [Studies in personality: Four researches with the method of R. Holt]. Torino: Boringhiere .
7.
Crews, F. (1986). Skeptical Engagements. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
——— (1995). The Memory Wars. New York: New York Review of Books.
9.
Derman, B.I. (1967). Adaptive vs. pathological regression in relation to psychological adjustment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia. Dissertation Abstracts International28(11—B):4754—4755.
10.
Ducey, C.P. (1975). Rorschach experiential and representational dimensions of object relations: A longitudinal study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , Harvard University.
11.
Eagle, C.J. (1964). An investigation of individual consistencies in the manifestations of primary process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University. Dissertation Abstracts International25(3):2045.
12.
Ebert, J.N., Ewing, J.H., Rogers, M.H., & Reynolds, D.J. (1977). Changes in primary process expression in hospitalized schizophrenics treated with phenothiazines: Two projective tasks compared. Journal of GeneticPsychology130:83—94.
13.
Ewing, J.H., Gillis, C.A., Scott, D.G., & Patzig, W.J. (1982). Fantasy processes and mild physical activity. Perceptual and Motor Skills54:363—368.
14.
——— Scott, D.G., Mendez, A.A., & Mcbride, T.J. (1984). Effects of aerobic exercise upon affect and cognition . Perceptual and Motor Skills59:407—414.
15.
Fishman, D.B. (1973). Rorschach adaptive regression and change in psychotherapy . Journal of Personality Assessment37:218—224.
16.
Freud, S. (1915). The unconscious. Standard Edition14:166—215.
17.
——— (1923). The ego and the id. Standard Edition19:12—66.
18.
Goldberger, L. (1961). Reactions to perceptual isolation and Rorschach manifestations of the primary process. Journal of Projective Techniques25:287—302.
19.
——— & Holt, R.R. (1961). A comparison of isolation effects and their personality correlates in two divergent samples. USAF Technical Report. No. 61—417.
20.
Grünbaum, A. (1984). The Foundations of Psychoanalysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
——— (1994). Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis. Psychological Issues Monograph 61. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
22.
Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist14:469—479.
23.
——— (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24.
Hartmann, H. (1950). Comments on the psychoanalytic theory of the ego . Psychoanalytic Study of the Child5:74—96.
25.
Heath, D.H. (1965). Explorations of Maturity. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
26.
——— (1976). Unpublished data transmitted by personal communication .
27.
Hébert, A., Lavoie, G., & Ally, G. (1973). Primary process manifestations at three age levels, in chronic schizophrenics and normal controls, monks and laymen. Paper presented at the 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Montréal.
28.
Holt, R.R. (1976). Freud's theory of the primary process: Present status. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Science5:61—99. Reprinted in R.R. Holt, Freud Reappraised: A Fresh Look at Psychoanalytic Theory. New York: Guilford Press, 1989, pp. 280—301.
29.
——— (1978). Methods in Clinical Psychology: Vol. 1. Projective Assessment. New York: Plenum.
30.
——— (1983). Il processo primario nel Rorschach e nel materiale tematico, transl. A. De Coro; ed. G.V. Caprara & N. Dazzi.Rome: Borla.
31.
——— (1986). Clinical and statistical prediction: A retrospective and would-be integrative perspective. Journal of Personality Assessment50:376—386.
32.
——— (1988). Judgment, inference, and reasoning in clinical perspective. In Reasoning, Inference, and Judgment in Clinical Psychology, ed. D.C. Turk & P. Salovey.New York: Free Press, pp. 233—250.
33.
——— (1989). Freud Reappraised. New York : Guilford Press.
34.
——— (in press). Primary Process Thinking: Theory, Assessment, and Empirical Research. 2 vols. Psychological Issues Monograph. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
35.
Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic Explorations in Art. New York: International Universities Press.
36.
Langan, R. (1984). Progressive regressions: Ego development and primary process thinking. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University. Dissertation Abstracts International46(1—B):305.
37.
Lavoie, G. (1964). Les processus primaires et secondaires chez les mères d'enfants schizophrènes. [Primary and secondary processes in the mothers of schizophrenic children.] Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université de Montréal.
38.
——— Michaud, M., Elie, R., & Amar, V. (1987). Hypnotizability as a prognostic index in schizophrenia: II. The functional relationship between increasing mastery over autistic thinking disorders and improvement in hypnotic response over a 10—17 year period (abstract). International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis35:179.
39.
Lazar, B. (1975). Creativity, primary process manifestations and ego activity and passivity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago. Dissertation Abstracts International36(4—B):1922.
40.
Lehtinen, S. (1981). Developmental changes in primary process manifestations in thought: A follow-up study of girls from four to seventeen. Psychiatria Fennica12:131—152.
41.
Loevinger, J. (1976). Ego Development. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
42.
Macmillan, M. (1997). Freud Evaluated: The Completed Arc. Rev. ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.
43.
Masling, J., Bornstein, R.F., Fishman, I., & Davila, J. (2002).Can Freud explain women as well as men? Psychoanalytic Psychology19:328—347.
44.
Matalon, E. (1975). Primary process thought and its relation to some areas of functioning in ten-year-old children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , Université de Montréal.
45.
Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist50:741—749.
46.
Meyer, G.J., Finn, S.E., Eyde, L.D., Kay, G.G., Moreland, K.L., Dies, R.R., Eisman, E.J., Kubixzyn, R.W., & Reed, G.M. (2002). Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist56:128—165.
47.
Murray, J., & Russ, S. (1981). Adaptive regression and types of cognitive flexibility . Journal of Personality Assessment45:59—65.
48.
Myers, T. (1972). Psychobiological factors associated with monotony tolerance. American Institute for Research Reports, No. R—72—1 . Washington, DC.
49.
Nass, M. (1963). Report on clinic follow-up study of schizophrenic children. Unpublished research report, Brooklyn College Educational Clinic.
50.
Newmeyer, J.A. (1972). Creativity and non-verbal communication in pre-adolescent white and black children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University . Dissertation Abstracts International33 (1—B):426—427.
51.
Philip, A.F. (1959). The effect of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD—25) on primary process thought manifestations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University. Dissertation Abstracts International24(4):961.
52.
Pine, F. (1962). Creativity and primary process: Sample variations . Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease134:506—511.
53.
——— & Holt, R.R. (1960). Creativity and primary process: A study of adaptive regression. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology61:370—379.
54.
Rabkin, J. (1967). Psychoanalytic assessment of change in organization of thought after psychotherapy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University. Dissertation Abstracts International28(11—B):4763.
55.
Rapaport, D., Gill, M.M., & Schafer, R. (1945—1946). Diagnostic Psychological Testing. 2 vols.. Rev. ed. New York: International Universities Press, 1968.
56.
Russ, S.W. (1988). The role of primary process thinking in child development. In Primitive Mental States and the Rorschach, ed. H.O. Lerner & P.M. Lerner.Madison, CT: International Universities Press, pp. 601—618.
57.
Saretsky, T. (1966). Effects of chlorpromazine on primary-process thought manifestations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology71:247—252.
58.
Schimek, J.G. (1975). A critical reexamination of Freud's concept of unconscious mental representation. International Review of Psychoanalysis51:279—297.
59.
Silverman, L.H. (1963). On the relationship between aggressive imagery and thought disturbance in Rorschach responses. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment27:336—344.
60.
——— Lapkin, B., & Rosenbaum, I.S. (1962). Manifestations of primary-process thinking in schizophrenia. Journal of Projective Techniques26:117—127.
Webster R. (1995). Why Freud Was Wrong. New York : Basic Books.
63.
Wiederhold, M.W. Von (1995). Piercing the body: A symbolic voice. A psychoanalytic view of contemporary body modification. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wright Institute. Dissertation Abstracts International56(5—B):2890.
64.
Wilcocks, R. (1994). Maelzel's Chess Player: Freud and the Rhetoric of Deceit. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
65.
Wright, N.A., & Abbey, D.S. (1965). Perceptual deprivation tolerance and adequacy of defenses. Perceptual and Motor Skills20:35—38.
66.
——— & Zubek, J.P. (1969). Relationship between perceptual deprivation tolerance and adequacy of defenses as measured by the Rorschach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology74:615—617.
