An integration of psychoanalytic theory with contemporary developments in cognitive neuroscience offers a useful perspective on long-standing controversies about the nature of transference, and a better understanding of the precise mechanisms by which transferential processes occur. Contemporary psychoanalytic views of transference are reviewed, and the many processes that constitute transference are described. Two issues that have emerged in different guises for several decades—the role of the analyst in eliciting transference, and the nature of “real” and “transferential” components of the therapeutic relationship—are reconsidered in the light of concepts such as connectionist networks. Although a useful analytic stance is one that allows the patient's enduring dynamics to dominate the analytic field, it is suggested, anonymity is neither a cognitive possibility nor the driving force behind most transference reactions, and the distinction between “real” and “transferential” perceptions is one of therapeutic interest, not of mechanism. Certain features of the analytic situation make some dynamics more likely than others to enter the treatment relationship, notably those related to authority, intimacy and attachment, and sexuality. Transference reactions are best understood as constructed from a combination of the patient's enduring dispositions to react in particular ways under particular conditions; features of the analytic situation and of the analyst; and interactions between patient and analyst. These reactions do not unfold ineluctably from the patient's mind in the consulting room, nor are they cognitive constructions of the patient-analyst dyad or co-constructions of relatively equal partners exerting their influence on the analytic field.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andersen, S., Reznik, I., & Manzella, L. (1996). Eliciting facial affect, motivation, and expectancies in transference: Significant-other representations in social relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology71:1108—1129.
2.
Brenner, C. (1979). Working alliance, therapeutic alliance, and transference . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association27(suppl.):137—157.
3.
Chused, J.F. (1991). The evocative power of enactments. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association39:615—639.
4.
Clyman, R.B. (1991). The procedural organization of emotions: A contribution from cognitive science to the psychoanalytic theory of therapeutic action . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association39(suppl.):349—382.
5.
Cooper, A.M. (1987). Changes in psychoanalytic ideas: Transference interpretation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association35:77—98.
6.
Dalgleish, T., & Power, M., EDS. (1999). Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. New York: Wiley.
7.
Fairbairn, W.R.D. (1952). Psychoanalytic Studies of the Personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
8.
Fast, I. (1979). Developments in gender identity: Gender differentiation in girls. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis60:443—453.
9.
Feldman, M. (1997). Projective identification: The analyst's involvement . International Journal of Psycho-Analysis78:227—241.
10.
Fiske, S.T. (1982). Schema-triggered affect: Applications to social perception. In Affect and Cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, ed. M.S. Clark & S.T. Fiske Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
Freud, S. (1912). The dynamics of transference. Standard Edition12:97—108.
12.
——— (1915). Observations on transference-love. Standard Edition12:157—173.
13.
——— (1917). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis: Part III. General theory of the neuroses. Standard Edition16:241—463.
14.
Friedman, L. (1991). A reading of Freud's papers on technique. Psychoanalytic Quarterly60:564—595.
15.
Gabbard, G.O. (1995). Countertransference: The emerging common ground . International Journal of Psycho-Analysis76:475—485.
16.
——— (2002). Psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapy . In Handbook of Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, ed. J. Livesley.New York: Guilford Press, pp. 359—376.
17.
——— & Westen, D. (2002). Rethinking therapeutic action. Unpublished manuscript.
18.
Gilbert, D. (1989). Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process. In Unintended Thought, ed. J.S. Uleman & J.A. Bargh. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 189—211.
19.
Glassman, N., & Andersen, S. (1997). Activating transference without consciousness: Using significant-other representations to go beyond the subliminally given information. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology , New York University.
20.
Greenson, R.R. (1967). The Technique and Practice of Psychoanalysis. Vol. 1. New York: International Universities Press.
21.
Hoffman, I.Z. (1998). Ritual and Spontaneity in the Psychoanalytic Process . Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press .
22.
Horowitz, M.J. (1988). Introduction to Psychodynamics: A Synthesis. New York: Basic Books.
23.
——— (1998). Cognitive Psychodynamics: From Conflict to Character . New York: Wiley.
24.
Jacobs, T.J. (1993). The inner experiences of the analyst: Their contribution to the analytic process. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis74:7—14.
25.
Joseph, B. (1989). Psychic Equilibrium and Psychic Change: Selected Papers ofBetty Joseph, ed. M. Feldman & E.B. Spillius. London: Routledge.
26.
Kernberg, O.F. (1975). Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism . New York: Aronson.
27.
Kohut, H. (1971). The Analysis of the Self. New York: International Universities Press.
28.
——— (1977). The Restoration of the Self. New York: International Universities Press.
29.
——— (1984). How Does Analysis Cure?Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
30.
Levin, F. (1997). Integrating some mind and brain views of transference: The phenomena. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association45:1121—1151.
31.
Lipton, S.D. (1977). The advantages of Freud's technique as shown in his analysis of the Rat Man. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis58:255—273.
32.
Lohser, B., & Newton P.M. (1996). Unorthodox Freud: The View from the Couch. New York: Guilford Press.
33.
Mclaughlin, J.T. (1991). Clinical and theoretical aspects of enactment . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association39:595—614.
34.
Mitchell, S.A. (1997). Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
35.
Ogden, T.H. (1979). On projective identification. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis60:357—373.
36.
Power, M., & Dalgleish, T. (1997). Cognition and Emotion: From Order to Disorder . East Sussex: Psychology Press .
37.
Racker, H. (1968). Transference and Countertransference. New York: International Universities Press .
38.
Renik, O. (1993). Analytic interaction: Conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst's irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanalytic Quarterly62:553—571.
39.
Sandler, J. (1976). Countertransference and role-responsiveness. International Review of Psycho-Analysis3:43—47.
40.
——— (1987). From Safety to Superego: Selected Papers of Joseph Sandler. New York: Guilford Press .
41.
——— (1990). On internal object relations. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association38:859—880.
42.
Singer, J.L. (1985). Transference and the human condition: A cognitive-affective perspective. Psychoanalytic Psychology2:189—219.
43.
Spillius, E.B. (1992). Clinical experiences of projective identification . In Clinical Lectures on Klein and Bion, ed. R. Anderson.London: Tavistock/Routledge , pp. 59—73.
44.
Stein, M. (1981). The unobjectionable positive transference. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association29:869—892.
45.
Stern, D.N. (1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York : Basic Books.
46.
——— Sander, L.W., Nahum, J.P., Harrison, A.M., Et AL ( 1998). Noninterpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy: The `something more' than interpretation? International Journal of Psycho-Analysis79:903—921.
47.
Stolorow, R.D. (1995). An intersubjective view of self psychology. Psychoanalytic Dialogues5:393—399.
48.
Wachtel, P. (1981). Transference, schema, and assimilation: The relationship of Piaget to the psychoanalytic theory of transference. Annual of Psychoanalysis8:59-76.
49.
——— (1997). Psychoanalysis, Behavior Therapy, and the Relational World. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
50.
Weiss, J. (1993). How Psychotherapy Works: Process and Technique . New York: Guilford Press.
51.
Westen, D. (1985). Self and Society: Narcissism, Collectivism, and the Development of Morals. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52.
——— (1988). Transference and information processing. Clinical Psychology Review8:161—179.
53.
——— (1994). Toward an integrative model of affect regulation: Applications to social-psychological research. Journal of Personality62:641—647.
54.
——— (1997). Toward an empirically and clinically sound theory of motivation. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis78:521-548.
55.
——— (1998). The scientific legacy of Sigmund Freud: Toward a psycho-dynamically informed psychological science. Psychological Bulletin124:333—371.
56.
——— (1999a). Psychodynamic theory and technique in relation to research on cognition and emotion: Mutual implications. In Handbook of Cognition and Emotion, ed. T. Dalgleish & M. PowerNew York: Wiley, pp.727—746.
57.
——— (1999b). The scientific status of unconscious processes: Is Freud really dead?Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association47:1061—1106.
58.
——— (in press). The language of psychoanalytic discourse. Psychoanalytic Dialogues.
59.
——— & Feit, W. (2002). All the President's women: Affective constraint satisfaction in ambiguous social cognition. Unpublished manuscript, Boston University.
60.
——— & Gabbard, G. (1999). Psychoanalytic approaches to personality. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, ed. L. Pervin & O. JohnNew York: Guilford Press, pp. 57—101.
61.
Zetzel, E.R. (1956). Current concepts of transference. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis37:369—376.
