This paper describes the difficulty of working with patients who have adopted conflict solutions common to perversion. These analysands' rapid shifts from one discontinuous mental state to another draw the analyst into a regressive transference/countertransference engagement characterized by alternations of actualized self and object representations. The analyst's disengagement from this regressive interaction is crucial, but difficult. A detailed clinical example illustrates the process of disengagement as well as the transformation of this transference into a more traditionally consolidated one. A technical approach is suggested and questions of representation and symbolization are explored.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amati-Mehler, J., Argentieri, S., & Canestri, J. (1991). The Babel of the Unconscious, transl. J. Whitelaw-Cucco . Madison, CT: International Universities Press, 1993.
2.
Arlow, J. (1971). Character perversion. In Currents in Psychoanalysis, ed. I.W. MarcusNewYork: International Universities Press, pp. 317—336.
3.
Bion, W. (1959). Attacks on linking. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis40:308—15.
4.
——— (1962). Learning from Experience. Northvale, NJ: Aronson, 1994.
5.
Cahn, R. (1983). Le procès du cadre ou la passion de Ferenczi. Revue française de la psychanalyse5:1108—1133.
6.
Caper, R. (1995). On the difficulty of making a mutative interpretation . International Journal of Psycho-Analysis76:91—101.
7.
Donnet, Jean-Luc. (1973). Le divan bien tempéré in Le divan bien tempéré . Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1995, pp. 75—111.
8.
Freud, S. (1914). Remembering, repeating, and working-through. Standard Edition12:147—156.
9.
——— (1927). Fetishism. Standard Edition21:152—157.
10.
——— (1938). The splitting of the ego in the process of defense . Standard Edition23:275—278.
11.
Green, A. (1993). Le travail du négatif. Paris : Editions de Minuit.
12.
——— (1998).The primordial mind and the work of the negative . International Journal of Psycho-Analysis79:649—665.
13.
Kernberg, O. (1979). Object relations theory and psychoanalytic technique . In Internal World and External Reality: Object Relations Theory Applied. New York: Aronson , 1980, pp. 155—179.
14.
——— (1984). Severe Personality Disorders: Psychotherapeutic Strategies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
15.
Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis27:99—110.
16.
Loewald, H. (1978). Primary process, secondary process, and language . In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven : Yale University Press, 1980, pp. 178—206.
17.
Orwell, G. (1949). 1984. New York: Signet, 1950.
18.
Reed, G. (1994). Transference Neurosis and Psychoanalytic Experience: Perspectives on Contemporary Clinical Practice. New York : Yale University Press.
19.
——— (1997). The analyst's interpretation as fetish. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association45:1153—1181.
20.
Renik, O. (1992). Use of the analyst as a fetish. Psychoanalytic Quarterly61:542—563.
21.
Sandler, J. (1976). Countertransference and role-responsiveness. International Review of Psycho-Analysis3:43—48.
22.
Segal, H. (1978). On symbolism. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis59:315—319.
23.
Viderman, S. (1970). La construction de l'espace analytique. Paris: Gallimard, 1982.
