Life-Threatening Illness in the Analyst

Abstract

The literature on practicing throughout a life-threatening illness is reviewed and important differences about attitudes toward self-disclosure are understood by noting a division between two perspectives on transference: “one-body” and “two-body” views. The analyst's use of self-disclosure is informed by the prominence given the interpretation of transference as against that given the patient's needs in the collaborative relatedness supporting the therapeutic alliance. Themes and illustrative clinical vignettes are presented from the author's own experience practicing during such an illness. Three phases of working during illness are delineated, each somewhat different regarding the analyst's state, and hence patients' needs and reactions. Recommendations are made regarding conditions that make it possible to work effectively during a life-threatening illness. The analyst needs help from his or her own analyst to make the clinically and sometimes ethically appropriate decisions about practice; while this is important in instances in which the analyst recovers, it is essential should the analyst become terminal and face more certain death.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abend, S. (1982). Serious illness in the analyst: Countertransference considerations. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 30:365—380.

Clark, R. (1995). The pope's confessor: A metaphor relating to illness in the analyst. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 43:137—149.

Dewald, P.A. (1982). Serious illness in the analyst: Transference, countertransference, and reality responses—and further reflections. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 30:347—364.

Feinsilver, D. (1998). The therapist as a person facing death: The hardest of external realities and therapeutic action. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 79:1131—1150.

Freedman, A. (1990). Death of the analyst as a form of termination of psychoanalysis. In Illness of the Analyst, ed. H. Schwartz , & A.-L. Silver New York: International Universities Press, pp. 299—331.

Morrison, A. , (1990). Doing psychotherapy while living with a lifethreatening illness. In Illness in the Analyst, ed. H. Schwartz & A.-L. Silver New York: International Universities Press, pp. 227—253.

Ogden, T. (1994). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 75:3—19.

Pizer, B. (1997). When the analyst is ill: Dimensions of self-disclosure . Psychoanalytic Quarterly 66:450—469.

Ponsi, M. (2000). Therapeutic alliance and collaborative interactions . International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 81:687—704.

10.

Schwaber, E.A. (1998). Traveling affectively alone. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 46:1004—1065.

11.

Schwartz, H. (1987). Illness in the doctor: Implications for analytic process. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 35: 657—692.

12.

——— & Silver, A.-L. , EDS. (1990 ). Illness in the Analyst: Implications for the Treatment Relationship . Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

13.

Silver, A. -L. (1990). Resuming the work with a life-threatening illness—and further reflections. Contemporary Psychoanalysis 18:314—326.