Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A critical assessment is presented of positions recently taken by Mitchell and Renik, who are taken as representatives of a “new view” in psychoanalysis. One article by Mitchell and two by Renik are examined as paradigmatic of certain ways of construing the nature of mind, the analyst's knowledge and authority, and the analytic process that are unduly influenced by the postmodern turn in psychoanalysis. Although “new view” theorists have made valid criticisms of traditional psychoanalytic theory and practice, they wind up taking untenable positions. Specifically called into question are their views on the relation between language and interpretation, on the one hand, and the mental contents of the patient on the other. A disjunction is noted between their discussion of clinical material and their conceptual stance, and their idiosyncratic redefinitions of truth and objectivity are criticized. Finally, a “humble realism” is suggested as the most appropriate philosophical position for psychoanalysts to adopt.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cavell, M. (1998). In response to Owen Renik's “The analyst's subjectivity and the analyst's objectivity.” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 79:1195—1202.

Eagle, M.N. (1987). The psychoanalytic and the cognitive unconscious . In Theories of the Unconscious and Theories of the Self, ed. R. Stern Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 155—189.

Fingarette, H. (1963). The Self in Transformation. New York: Basic Books.

——— (1969). Self-Deception. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Freud, S. (1916—1917). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis, Part 3. Standard Edition 11:243—496.

——— (1954). The Origins of Psychoanalysis, ed. M. Bonaparte , A. Freud , & E. Kris London: Imago Publishing.

Friedman, L. (1998). Overview. In Knowledge and Authority in the Psychoanalytic Relationship, ed. O. Renik Northvale, NJ: Aronson , pp. viii—xxii.

Geha, R.E. (1984). On psychoanalytic history and the “real” story of fictitious lives. International Forum of Psychoanalysis 1:221—229.

Gill, M.M. (1982). TheAnalysisofTransference: Vol. 1. Theory and Technique. New York: International Universities Press.

10.

——— (1994). Psychoanalysis in Transition. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

11.

Green, A. (1986). The Private Madness. London : Hogarth Press.

12.

Holzman, P.S. (1985). Psychoanalysis: Is the therapy destroying the science? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 33:725—770.

13.

Kirshner, L.A. (1999). Toward a postmodern realism for psychoanalysis . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 47:445—463.

14.

Klein, G.S. (1976). Psychoanalytic Theory: An Explanation of the Essentials . New York: International Universities Press.

15.

Meissner, W.W. (1998). Review of S.A. Mitchell's “Influence and autonomy in psychoanalysis.” Psychoanalytic Books 94:419—423.

16.

Mitchell, S.A. (1998). The analyst's knowledge and authority. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 67:1—31.

17.

——— (2000). Reply to Silverman. Psychoanalytic Psychology 17:153—159.

18.

Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

19.

——— (1976). Cognition and Reality. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.

20.

Ogden, T. (1997). Reverie and Interpretation: Sensing Something Human. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.

21.

Piaget, J. (1954). The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Basic Books.

22.

Renik, O. (1993). Analytic interaction: Conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst's irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 62:553—571.

23.

——— (1996). The perils of neutrality. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 65: 495—517.

24.

——— (1998a). The analyst's subjectivity and the analyst's objectivity. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 79:487—498.

25.

———, ED. (1998b). Knowledge and Authority in the Psychoanalytic Relationship. Northvale, NJ: Aronson .

26.

Sartre, J. -P. (1956). Being and Nothingness, transl. H. Barnes. New York: Philosophical Library.

27.

Sass, L.A. (1992). The epic of disbelief: The postmodernist turn in contemporary psychoanalysis. In Psychology and Postmodernism , ed. S. Kvala London: Sago, pp. 166—182.

28.

Schafer, R. (1992). Retelling a Life: Narration and Dialogue in Psycho-analysis . New York: Basic Books.

29.

Searle J. (1998). Mind, Language, and Society: Philosophy in the Real World. New York: Basic Books .

30.

Silverman, D.K. (2000). An interrogation of the relational turn: A discussion with Stephen Mitchell. Psychoanalytic Psychology 17:146—152.

31.

Smith, H.F. (1999). Subjectivity and objectivity in analytic listening . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 47:465—484.

32.

Stern, D.B. ( 1989). The analyst's unformulated experience of the patient . Contemporary Psychoanalysis 25:1—33.

33.

——— (1999). Unformulated experience: From familiar chaos to creative disorder. In Relational Psychoanalysis: The Emergence of a Tradition, ed. S.A. Mitchell & L. Aron Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 77—107.

34.

Stone, L. (1981). Noninterpretive elements in the psychoanalytic situation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 29:69—118.

35.

Weiss, J. , & Sampson, H. (1986). The Psychoanalytic Process: Theory, Clinical Observations, and Empirical Research. New York: Guilford Press.

The Analyst's Knowledge and Authority: a Critique of the “New View” in Psychoanalysis

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References