Margaret Mahler's seminal work on the psychological birth of the infant has generated more critical discussion than most other psychoanalytic theories of early development. But while the empirically, theoretically, and methodologically based criticisms of Mahler's theory are generally justified, her critics fail at times to consider some of the intriguing and creative insights that her theoretical formulations tried to capture. This paper attempts to reformulate these insights using the new conceptual tools that current cognitive developmental theory provides. Mahler's stage of normal autism is reconsidered in the light of contingency detection theory as an initial phase of primary preoccupation with self-generated perfectly response-contingent stimulation. Her concept of normal symbiosis is recast with the help of attachment theory's views on homeostatic regulation and the social biofeedback model of affect-reflective mirroring interactions with parents. Finally, her ideas about the development of splitting and libidinal object constancy are reconsidered according to recent theories of early representational development and mentalization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ainsworth, M.D.S., Blehar, M.C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
Bahrick, L.R., & Watson, J.S. (1985). Detection of intermodal proprioceptive-visual contingency as a potential basis of self-perception in infancy. Developmental Psychology21:963—973.
3.
Baillargeon, R. (1993). The object concept revisited: New directions in the investigation of infants' physical knowledge. In Carnegie-Mellon Symposia on Cognition, vol. 23: Visual Perception and Cognition in Infancy , ed. C.E. Granrud.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 265—315.
4.
Bartsch, K., & Wellman, H.M. (1995). Children Talk about the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
Bion, W.R. (1962). A theory of thinking. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis43:306—310.
6.
——— (1967). Second Thoughts. London: Heinemann.
7.
Bower, T.G.R. (1982). Development in Infancy. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
8.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss, vol. 1: Attachment. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis .
9.
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (1998). The teleological origins of mentalistic action explanations: A developmental hypothesis. Developmental Science1:255—259.
10.
——— ——— Biró, S., Koós, O., & Brockbank, M. (1999). Goal-attribution without agency cues: The perception of “pure reason” in infancy. Cognition72:237—267.
11.
Dennett, D. (1987). The Intentional Stance. Cambridge : MIT Press.
12.
Dicara, L.V. (1970). Learning in the autonomic nervous system. Scientific American222:30—39.
13.
Eagle, M.N. (1984). Recent Developments in Psychoanalysis: A Critical Evaluation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
14.
Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., & Ellsworth, P. (1972). Emotion in the Human Face. New York: Pergamon.
15.
Emde, R.N. (1988). Development terminable and interminable: I. Innate and motivational factors from infancy. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis69:23—42.
16.
Fantz, R. (1963). Pattern vision in newborn infants. Science140:296—297.
17.
Field, T. (1979). Differential behavioral and cardiac responses of 3-month-old infants to a mirror and peer. Infant Behavior and Development2:179—184.
18.
——— Woodson, R., Cohen, D., Garcia, R., & Greenberg, R. (1983). Discrimination and imitation of facial expressions by term and preterm neonates. Infant Behavior and Development6:485—490.
19.
Fodor, J. (1987). Psychosemantics. Cambridge : MIT Press.
20.
———( 1992). A theory of the child's theory of mind. Cognition44:283—296.
21.
Fónagy, I. & Fonagy, P. (1995). Communication with pretend actions in language, literature, and psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought18:363—418.
22.
Fonagy, P., Steele, M., Moran, G.S., Steele, H., & Higgitt, A. (1992). Measuring the ghost in the nursery: An empirical study of the relation between parents' mental representations of childhood experiences and their infants' security of attachment. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association41:957—989.
23.
——— & Target, M. (1996). Playing with reality: I. Theory of mind and the normal development of psychic reality. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis77:217—234.
24.
——— ——— (1997). Attachment and reflective function: Their role in self-organization. Development and Psychopathology9:679—700.
25.
——— ——— & Gergely, G. (2000). Attachment and borderline personality disorder: A theory and some evidence. Psychiatric Clinics of North America23:103—123.
26.
Freud, S. (1911). Formulations on the two principles of mental functioning . Standard Edition12:67—104.
27.
——— (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. Standard Edition18:1—64.
28.
Friedlander, B.Z. (1970). Receptive language development in infancy. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly16:7—51.
29.
Gergely, G. (1992). Developmental reconstructions: Infancy from the point of view of psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought14:3—55.
30.
——— (1995). The biofeedback model of parental affect-mirroring . Paper presented at the 39th Congress of the International Psychoanalytical Association.
31.
——— & Csibra, G. (1997). Teleological reasoning in infancy: The infant's naive theory of rational action. A reply to Premack and Premack. Cognition63:227—233.
32.
——— Magyar, J., & Balázs, A. (1999). Childhood autism as “blindness” to less-than-perfect contingencies. Poster, Biennial Conference of the International Society for Research in Childhood and Adolescent Psychopathology (ISRCAP), Barcelona, June 1999.
33.
——— Nádasdy, Z., Csibra, G., & Biró, S. (1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition56:165—193.
34.
——— & Watson, J. (1996). The social biofeedback model of parental affect-mirroring . International Journal of Psycho-Analysis77:1181—1212.
35.
——— ——— (1999). Early social-emotional development: Contingency perception and the social biofeedback model. In Early Social Cognition, ed. P. Rochat.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 101—136.
36.
——— Koós, O., & Watson, J.S. (2000). Contingency perception and the role of contingent parental reactivity in early socio-emotional development: Some implications for developmental psychopathology. In Imitation, Action et Intentionnalité, ed. J. Nadel & H. Decety. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, in press.
37.
Greenberg, J.R., & Mitchell, S.A. (1983). Psychoanalysis and Object Relations Theory. New York: Basic Books.
38.
Hirschfeld, L., & Gelman, S., EDS. (1994). Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Hofer, M.A. (1990). Early symbiotic processes: Hard evidence from a soft place. In Pleasure beyond the Pleasure Principle, ed. R.A. Glick & S. Bone.New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 55—78.
40.
——— (1995). Hidden regulators: Implications for a new understanding of attachment, separation and loss. In Attachment Theory: Social, Developmental, and Clinical Perspectives, ed. S. Goldberg, R. Muir, & J. Kerr.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 203—230.
41.
Izard, C.E. (1978). Emotions as motivations: An evolutionary-developmental perspective. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation , vol. 26, ed. J.H.E. Howe. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 163—199.
42.
Jacobson, E. (1964). The Self and the Object World. New York: International Universities Press.
43.
Kaye, K.L., & Bower, T.G.R. (1994). Learning and intermodal transfer of information in newborns. Psychological Science5:286—288.
44.
Kernberg, P.F. (1984). Reflections in the mirror: Mother-child interactions, self-awareness, and self-recognition. In Frontiers of Infant Psychiatry, vol. II, ed. J.D. Call, E. Galenson, & R.L. Tyson. New York: Basic Books.
45.
Klein, M. (1935). A contribution to the psychogenesis of manic-depressive states. The Writings of Melanie Klein, vol. I. London: Hogarth Press, 1975, pp. 262—289.
46.
——— (1930). The psychotherapy of the psychoses. Contributions to Psychoanalysis, 1921—1945. London: Hogarth Press, 1948, pp. 251—253.
47.
Klein, M. (1980). On Mahler's autistic and symbiotic phases: An exposition and evolution. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought4:69—105.
48.
Leslie, A.M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “Theory of Mind.” Psychological Review94:412—426.
49.
——— (1994). TOMM, ToBy, and agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture, ed. L. Hirschfeld & S. Gelman.New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 119—148.
50.
Lewis, M., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1979). Social Cognition and the Acquisition of Self. New York: Plenum.
51.
Lichtenberg, J.D. (1981). Implications for psychoanalytic theory of research on the neonate. International Review of Psycho-Analysis8:35—52.
52.
——— (1987). Infant studies and clinical work with adults. Psychoanalytic Inquiry7:311—330.
53.
Lyons-Ruth, K. (1991). Rapprochement or approchement: Mahler's theory reconsidered from the vantage point of recent research in early attachment relationships. Psychoanalytic Psychology8:1—23.
54.
Magyar, J., & Gergely, G. (1998). The obscure object of desire: “Nearly, but clearly not, like me”: Perceiving self-generated contingencies in normal children and children with autism. Poster, International Conference on Infant Studies, Atlanta, April 1998.
55.
Mahler, M.S. (1952). On child psychosis and schizophrenia: Autistic and symbiotic infantile psychoses. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child7:286—305.
56.
——— & Furer, M. (1968). On Human Symbiosis and the Vicissitudes of Individuation, vol.1: Infantile Psychosis. New York: International Universities Press.
57.
——— & Gosliner, B.J. (1955). On symbiotic child psychosis: Genetic, dynamic and restitutive aspects. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child10:195—212.
58.
——— & Mcdevitt, J.B. (1982). Thoughts on the emergence of the sense of self, with particular emphasis on the body self. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association30:827—848.
59.
——— Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1975). The Psychological Birth of the Human Infant: Symbiosis and Individuation. New York: Basic Books.
60.
Main, M., & Hesse, E. (1990). Parents' unresolved traumatic experiences are related to infant disorganized attachment status: Is frightened and/or frightening parental behavior the linking mechanism? In Attachment in the Preschool Years: Theory, Research, and Intervention, ed. M.T. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti , & E.M. Cummings.The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation series on mental health and development. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 161—182.
61.
——— Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In Growing Points of Attachment Theory and Research, ed. I. Bretherton & E. Waters.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, serial no. 209, vol. 50. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1985 , pp. 66—104.
62.
Meltzoff, A.N. (1990). Towards a developmental cognitive science: The implications of cross-modal matching and imitation for the development of representation and memory in infancy. Annals of the New York Academy of Science608:1—37.
63.
——— & Borton, W. (1979). Intermodal matching by human neonates. Nature282:403—404.
64.
——— & Moore, M.K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science198:75—78.
65.
——— ——— (1989). Imitation in newborn infants: Exploring the range of gestures imitated and the underlying mechanisms. Developmental Psychology25:954—962.
66.
Miller, N.E. (1969). Learning visceral and glandular responses. Science163:434—445.
67.
——— (1978). Biofeedback and visceral learning. Annual Review of Psychology29:373—404.
68.
Morton, J., & Johnson, M. (1991). The perception of facial structure in infancy . In The Perception of Structure: Essays in Honor of Wendell R. Garner, ed. G.R. Lockhead & J.R. Pomerantz.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 317—325.
69.
Nachman, P.A., Stern, D.N., & Best, C. (1986). Affective reactions to stimuli and infants' preferences for novelty and familiarity. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry25:801—804.
70.
Papousek, H., & Papousek, M. (1974). Mirror-image and self recognition in young human infants: A new method of experimental analysis. Developmental Psychobiology7:149—157.
71.
Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the Representational Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
72.
Peterfreund, E. (1978). Some critical comments on psychoanalytic conceptualizations of infancy. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis59:427—441.
73.
Piaget, J. (1936). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York: Norton, 1963 .
74.
Pine, F. (1986). The “symbiotic phase” in light of current infancy research. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic50:564—569.
75.
——— (1990). Drive, Ego, Object and Self: A Synthesis for Clinical Work. New York: Basic Books.
76.
Rochat, P. (1995). Early objectification of the self. In The Self in Infancy: Theory and Research, ed. P. Rochat.Advances in Psychology 112. Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 53—71.
77.
——— ED. (1999). Early Social Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
78.
——— & Morgan, R. (1995). The function and determinants of early self-exploration . In The Self in Infancy: Theory and Research, ed. P. Rochat.Advances in psychology 112. Amsterdam: North-Holland/ Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 395—415.
79.
Spelke, E.S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J. & Jacobson, K. (1992). Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review99:605—632.
80.
Spitz, R. (1965). The First Year of Life. New York: International Universities Press.
81.
Stern, D.N. (1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York : Basic Books.
82.
——— (1990). Joy and Satisfaction in Infancy. In Pleasure Beyond the Pleasure Principle, ed. R.A. Glick & S. Bone.New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 13—25.
83.
——— (1995). The Motherhood Constellation: A Unified View of Parent-Infant Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
84.
Tomasello, M. (1995). Joint attention as social cognition. In Joint Attention: Its Origins and Role in Development, ed. C. Moore & P. Dunham.New York: Erlbaum, pp. 103—130.
85.
Tyson, P., & Tyson, R.L. (1990). Psychoanalytic Theories of Development: An Integration . New Haven: Yale University Press .
86.
Van Ijzendoorn, M.H., Juffer, F., & Duyvesteyn, M.G.C. (1995). Breaking the intergenerational cycle of insecure attachment: A review of the effects of attachment-based interventions on maternal sensitivity and infant security. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry36:225—248.
87.
Watson, J.S. (1972). Smiling, cooing, and “the game. ” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly18:323—339.
88.
——— (1979). Perception of contingency as a determinant of social responsiveness. In The Origins of Social Responsiveness , ed. E. Thoman.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 33—64.
89.
——— (1994). Detection of self: The perfect algorithm. In Self-Awareness in Animals and Humans: Developmental Perspectives , ed. S. Parker, R. Mitchell, & M. Boccia.New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131—149.
90.
Wellman, H. (1990). The Child's Theory of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
91.
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition13:103—128.
92.
Winnicott, D.W. (1967). Mirror-role of the mother and family in child development. In The Predicament of the Family: A Psycho-Analytical Symposium, ed. P. Lomas. London: Hogarth, pp. 26—33.
93.
Wolff, P.H. (1959). Observations on newborn infants. Psychosomatic Medicine21:110—118.
