Papers that present the life of the analytic session offer material through which analysts can together study analytic process and therapeutic action and arrive at consensus on how to improve psychoanalytic theory and practice. But some analysts have been deterred from publishing clinical material of that kind because of concerns about preserving confidentiality, protecting the therapeutic relationship, reporting accurately, being scrutinized, worrying about losing their colleagues' support, and not feeling authorized to present their views. Here conscious, preconscious, and unconscious constraints against writing and publishing are explored, and an example is given of successful self-analysis of a writing inhibition. The debate over the ethics of writing is reviewed and an argument made that detailed clinical description is useful in advancing analytic understanding. Finally, a clinical example shows how the analysand usefully analyzes the experience of reading what the analyst has written, and how the analyst's self-analysis may be promoted in resonance with the analysand's experience.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrams, S. (1994). The publication of clinical facts: A natural science view. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis75:1201—1211.
2.
Adler, M.J., & Doren, C. Van (1972). How to Read a Book. New York : Simon & Schuster.
3.
Aron, L. (1996). A Meeting of Minds. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
4.
Britton, R. (1994). Publication anxiety: Conflict between communication and affiliation. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis75:1213—1224.
5.
Clift, M. (1986). Writing about psychiatric patients. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic50:511—523.
6.
Freud, S. (1905). Fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria . Prefatory remarks. Standard Edition7:7—14.
7.
Galatzer-Levy, R. (1995). Psychoanalysis and chaos theory. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association43:1095—1113.
8.
Green, A. (1993). Two discussions of “The inner experiences of the analyst” and a response from Theodore Jacobs. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis74:1131—1136.
9.
Jacobs, T. (1991). The Use of the Self. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
10.
——— (1993a). The inner experiences of the analyst: Their contribution to the analytic process. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis74:7—14.
11.
——— (1993b). Response. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis74:1140—1145.
12.
Jordan-Moore, J.F. (1994). Intimacy and science: The publication of clinical facts in psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis75:1251—1266.
13.
Kaplan, D.M. (1995). The unfinished manuscript in the drawer: Observations on the analysis of a type of symptom. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis76:283—298.
14.
Klumpner, G., & Frank, A. (1991). On the method of reporting clinical material. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association39:537—551.
15.
Leader, Z. (1991). Writer's Block. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
16.
Levine, H.B. (1990). Clinical issues in the analysis of analysands who were abused as children: Presentation of case material. In Adult Analysis and Childhood Sexual Abuse, ed. H.B. Levine.Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 214—217.
17.
Lipton, E. (1991). The analyst's use of clinical material. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association39:967—985.
18.
Loewald, H. (1979). The waning of the Oedipus complex. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association27:751—776.
19.
Marcovitz, E. (1973). On confidentiality in psychoanalysis. Bulletin of the Philadelphia Association ofPsychoanalysis23:1—7.
20.
Michels, R. (1997). The case history. Plenary address, American Psychoanalytic Association Winter Meeting, New York, December.
21.
Nahkla, F., & Jackson, G. (1993). Picking up the Pieces. New Haven: Yale University Press.
22.
Ogden, T. (1994). Subjects of Analysis. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
Schwaber, E.A. (1997). Discussion: Ethical issues in clinical case reporting . Discussion group (chairs S. Behnke & E. Wallwork), American Psychoanalytic Association Fall Meeting, New York , December.
30.
Shapiro, E. (1998). Discussion of precirculated paper, “On writing from clinical experience.”American Psychoanalytic Association Fall Meeting, New York, December 19.
31.
Shapiro, T. (1994). Psychoanalytic facts: From the editor's desk. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis75:1225—1232.
32.
Spence, D.P. (1981). Psychoanalytic competence. International Journal of Psychoanalysis62:113—124.
33.
Stein, M.H. (1988a). Writing about psychoanalysis: I. Those who write and those who do not. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association36:105—124.
34.
——— (1988b). Writing about psychoanalysis: II. Analysts who write, analysands who read. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association36:393—408.
35.
Steiner, J. (1994). Patient-centered and analyst-centered interpretations: Some implications of containment and countertransference. Psychoanalytic Inquiry14:406—422.
36.
Stoller, R. (1988). Analysands responses to their own case reports . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association36:371—391.
37.
Strachey, J. (1958). Editor's introduction to papers on technique. Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works ofSigmund Freud, ed. J. Strachey, vol. 12, pp. 85—88. London: Hogarth Press.
38.
Sutherland, J.D. (1989). Fairbairn's Journey into the Interior. London: Free Association.
39.
——— (1990). Reminiscences. In The Autonomous Self: The Work of John D. Sutherland, ed. J.S. Scharff.Northvale, NJ: Aronson, 1994, pp. 392—423.
40.
——— (1993). The autonomous self. In The Autonomous Self: The Work of John D. Sutherland, ed. J.S. Scharff.Northvale, NJ: Aronson, pp. 303—330.
41.
Widlöcher, D. (1994). A case is not a fact. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis75:1233—1244.
