Psychoanalytic discussants of clinical papers face certain tasks, opportunities, and difficulties. To be willing to present and publish their analytic work for colleagues to study, analyst-authors and discussants need to expect that the other will respectfully complement his or her perspective. Discussants are encouraged to immerse themselves playfully in the affective force-field constituted between analysand and analyst within the process of the presentation. As discussants struggle to extricate themselves from this force-field, they contribute best by confining their understandings to the presentation process rather than trying to pin down the actual psychoanalytic situation. When this is done, discussants are under less pressure to inform presenters. This paper considers how discussants need to process their feeling responses to clinical papers so as to enhance rather than injure the analyst-author. This approach is illustrated with vignettes of the author's efforts as a clinical discussant to become a constructive psychoanalytic reader.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barratt, B. (1994). Critical notes on the psychoanalyst's theorizing . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association42:697—725.
2.
Barthes, R. (1973). The Pleasure of the Text, transl. R. Miller. New York: Hill & Wang, 1975.
3.
——— (1979). From work to text. In Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism, ed. J.V. Harari.Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 73—81.
4.
Berman, E. (1997). Psychoanalytic supervision as the crossroads of a relational matrix. In Psychodynamic Supervision: Perspectives of the Supervisor and the Supervisee, ed. M.H. Rock.Northvale, NJ: Aronson , pp. 161—186.
5.
Bleich, D. (1967). The determination of literary value. Literature and Psychology27:19—30.
6.
——— (1975). The subjective character of critical interpretation . College English36:739—755.
7.
——— (1976). The subjective paradigm in science, psychology, and criticism. New Literary History7:313—334.
8.
——— (1977). The logic of interpretation. Genre10:363—394.
Booth, W. (1979). Critical Understanding: The Powers and Limits of Pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Bromberg, P.M. (1982). The supervisory process and parallel process. Contemporary Psychoanalysis18:92—111.
12.
——— (1984). The third ear. In Clinical Perspectives on the Supervision of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, ed. L. Caligor, P.M. Bromberg , & J.D. Meltzer.New York: Plenum, pp. 29—44.
13.
Coen, S.J. (1982a). Louis-Ferdinand Céline's Castle to Castle: The author-reader relationship in its narrative style. American Imago39:343—368.
14.
——— (1982b). Introduction to Essays on the relationship of author and reader: Transference implications for psychoanalytic literary criticism . Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought5:3—15.
15.
——— (1984). The author and his audience: Jean Genet's early work. Psychoanalytic Study of Society10:301—320.
16.
——— (1985). Freud and Fliess: A supportive literary relationship . American Imago42:385—412.
17.
——— (1988). How to read Freud: A critique of recent Freud scholarship. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association36:483—515.
18.
——— (1992). The Misuse of Persons: Analyzing Pathological Dependency. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
19.
——— (1994). Between Author and Reader: A Psychoanalytic Approach to Writing and Reading. New York: Columbia University Press.
20.
——— (1996). Passions and perils of interpretation (of dreams and texts): An appreciation of Erik Erikson's specimen paper. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis77:537—548.
21.
——— (1997a). How to help patients (and analysts) bear the unbearable. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association45:1183—1207.
22.
——— (1997b). Review of Fantasy and Reality in History by Peter Loewenberg. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis78:199—202.
23.
——— (1998). Perverse defenses in neurotic patients. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association46:1169—1194.
24.
——— (in press).The wish to regress in patient and analyst. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.
25.
Eigen, M. (1997). Being two good. In Psychodynamic Supervision: Perspectives of the Supervisor and the Supervisee, ed. M.H. Rock.Northvale, NJ: Aronson, pp. 57—72.
26.
Erikson, E.H. (1954). The dream specimen of psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association2:2—56.
27.
——— (1955). Freud's “The origins of psychoanalysis.”International Journal of Psycho-Analysis36:1—15.
28.
Felman, S. (1977). Turning the screw of interpretation. Yale French Studies55/56:94—207.
29.
——— (1987). Jacques Lacan and the Adventure of Insight: Psychoanalysis in Contemporary Culture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
30.
Fish, S. (1980). Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
31.
Gadamer, H.G. (1975). Truth and Method. New York : Seabury Press.
32.
Gediman, H., & Wolkenfeld, F. (1980). The parallelism phenomenon in psychoanalysis and supervision: Its reconsideration as a triadic system . Psychoanalytic Quarterly49:234—255.
33.
Gorney, J.E. (1980). The field of illusion in literature and the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought2:527—550.
34.
Green, A. (1978). The double and the absent. In Psychoanalysis, Creativity, and Literature: A French-American Inquiry, ed. A. Roland.New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 271—292.
35.
Grotstein, J. (1996). Two-day clinical workshop, American Psychoanalytic Association Meetings, December, New York .
36.
Holland, N. (1968). The Dynamics of Literary Response. New York: Norton.
37.
——— (1970). Discussion of “Criticism and the experience of interiority” by G. Poulet. In The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, ed. R. Macksey & E. Donato.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press , pp. 86—87.
38.
——— (1973). Poems in Persons: An Introduction to the Psychoanalysis of Literature. New York: Norton .
39.
——— (1975a). Five Readers Reading. New Haven: Yale University Press.
——— (1976). The new paradigm: Subjective or transactive? New Literary History7:335—346.
42.
——— (1978). Literary interpretation and three phases of psychoanalysis . In Psychoanalysis, Creativity, and Literature: A French-American Inquiry, ed. A. Roland.New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 233—247.
43.
——— (1982). Why this is transference, nor am I out of it. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought5:27—34.
44.
Iser, W. (1978). The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press .
45.
Issacharoff, A. (1984). Countertransference in supervision: Therapeutic consequences for the supervisee. In Clinical Perspectives on the Supervision of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, ed. L. Caligor, P.M. Bromberg , & J.D. Meltzer.New York: Plenum, pp. 89—105.
46.
Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic Explorations in Art. New York: International Universities Press.
47.
Levenson, E. (1982). Follow the fox. Contemporary Psychoanalysis18:1—15.
48.
Loewald, H. (1970). Psychoanalytic theory and the psychoanalytic process . Psychoanalytic Study of the Child25:45—68.
49.
——— (1975). Psychoanalysis as an art and the fantasy character of the psychoanalytic situation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association23:277—299.
50.
Loewenberg, P. (1995). Fantasy and Reality in History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
Mahony, P. (1977). Friendship and its discontents. Contemporary Psychoanalysis15:55—109.
52.
——— (1982). Freud as a Writer. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
53.
——— (1984a). Cries of the Wolf Man. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
54.
——— (1984b). Further reflections on Freud and his writing . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association32:847—864.
55.
——— (1986). Freud and the Rat Man. New Haven: Yale University Press. ——— (1987). Psychoanalysis and Discourse. London: Tavistock Publications, 1989.
56.
——— (1989). On Defining Freud's Discourse. New Haven: Yale University Press.
57.
Ogden, T.H. (1994). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis75:3—19.
58.
——— (1997). Reverie and metaphor: Some thoughts on how I work as a psychoanalyst. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis78:719—732.
59.
Panel (1996). The patient's processing of the analyst's interpretations. American Psychoanalytic Association Meetings, May, Los Angeles.
60.
Poulet, G. (1970). Criticism and the experience of interiority. In The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, ed. R. Macksey & E. Donato.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 56—72.
61.
Reed, G.S. (1982). Toward a methodology for applying psychoanalysis to literature. Psychoanalytic Quarterly51:19—42.
Rosenblatt, L. (1938). Literature as Exploration. Rev. ed. New York: Noble & Noble, 1968 .
64.
Schafer, R. (1983). The Analytic Attitude. New York: Basic Books.
65.
Schwartz, M.M. (1975). Where is literature? College English36:756—765.
66.
——— (1978). Critic, define thyself. In Psychoanalysis and the Question of the Text, ed. G. Hartmann.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press , pp. 1—17.
67.
——— (1980). Shakespeare through contemporary psychoanalysis . In Representing Shakespeare: New Psychoanalytic Essays, ed. M.M. Schwartz & C. Kahn.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 21—32.
68.
———( 1982). The literary use of transference. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought5:35—44.
69.
——— & Willbern, D. (1982). Literature and psychology. In Inter-relations of Literature, ed J.P. Berricelli & J. Gibaldi.New York: Modern Language Association, pp. 205—224.
70.
Skura, M.A. (1981). The Literary Use of the Psychoanalytic Process . New Haven: Yale University Press .
71.
Stein, M.H. (1988). Writing about psychoanalysis: I. Analysts who write and those who do not. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association36:105—124.
72.
Stimpson, C.R. (1985). The somagrams of Gertrude Stein. In The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader, ed. H. Abelove, M.A. Barale, & D.M. Halperin.New York: Routledge, 1993, pp. 642—652.
73.
Symposium (1996a). Experiencing the other: Emotional contact in the therapeutic situation. Association for PsychoanalyticMedicine, March, New York.
74.
——— (1996b). The limits of analysis, impasse and unanalyzability: Perspectives on analytic failures. New York Psychoanalytic Society Extension Division.
75.
Tuckett, D. (1991). Editorial: Fifteen clinical accounts of psychoanalysis: A further invitation. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis72:377—381.
76.
——— (1993). Some thoughts on the presentation and discussion of the clinical material of psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis74:1175—1189.
77.
Weissman, P. (1962). The psychology of the critic and psychological criticism. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association10:745—761.
78.
Winnicott, D.W. (1967). The location of cultural experience. In Playing and Reality. New York: Basic Books, 1971, pp. 95—103.
79.
——— (1971). Playing: Creative activity and the search for the self. In Playing and Reality. New York : Basic Books, 1971, pp. 53—64.
80.
Wyman, H.M., & Rittenberg, S. (1992). Reflections on the written presentation of psychoanalytic clinical data: Necessary source and perennial problem. Journal of Clinical Psychoanalysis1:323—331.
