It is postulated that the surface of the mind reflects a variety of shifting self-syntonic and self-dystonic contents striving to achieve a stable homeostatic balance. Shifts between self-syntonic and self-dystonic contents are seen to reflect an underlying intrasystemic conflict within the superego between conflicting superego injunctions. These shifts possess a cyclical quality, as self-syntonic contents become self-dystonic and as self-dystonic contents become self-syntonic. This conceptualization of the psychic surface has implications for a comparative study of psychoanalytic technique and for implementing the technical recommendation to work from surface to depth. It is suggested that the analyst's interpretations become assimilated within cyclical processes of superego reaction and repair.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Apfelbaum, B., & Gill, M. (1989). Ego analysis and the relativity of defense: Technical implications of the structural theory. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association37:1071—1096.
2.
Arlow, J., & Brenner, C. (1990). The psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Quarterly59:678—692.
3.
Blanton, S. (1971). Diary of My Analysis with Sigmund Freud. New York: Hawthorn Books.
4.
Brenner, C. (1982). The Mind in Conflict. New York : International Universities Press.
5.
Fenichel, O. (1941). Problems of Psychoanalytic Technique. New York: Psychoanalytic Quarterly.
6.
——— (1953). The Collected Papers of Otto Fenichel: First Series . New York: Norton.
7.
Freud, A. (1936). The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense. New York: International Universities Press, 1966.
8.
Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. Standard Edition4/5.
9.
——— (1911). The handling of dream interpretation in psycho-analysis . Standard Edition12:89—96.
10.
——— (1914a). On narcissism: An introduction. Standard Edition14:73—102.
11.
——— (1914b). Remembering, repeating and working-through. Standard Edition12:145—156.
12.
——— (1917). Mourning and melancholia. Standard Edition14:237—258.
13.
——— (1923). The ego and the id. Standard Edition19:12—66.
14.
Glover, E. (1955). The Technique of Psycho-Analysis. New York: International Universities Press.
15.
Gray, P. (1994). The Ego and the Analysis of Defense. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
16.
James, W. (1892). Psychology: The Briefer Course. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
17.
Josephs, L. . (1995). Balancing Empathy and Interpretation: Relational Character Analysis. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
18.
——— (1997). The view from the tip of the iceberg. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association45: 425—463.
19.
Kernberg, O. (1984). Severe Personality Disorders. New Haven: Yale University Press.
20.
Kohut, H. (1971). The Analysis of the Self. New York: International Universities Press.
21.
——— (1977). The Restoration of the Self. New York: International Universities Press.
22.
——— (1979). The two analyses of Mr. Z. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis60:3—27.
23.
Kris, A. (1990). Helping patients by analyzing self-criticism. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association38:605—636.
24.
Landau, B.J. (1996). Consciousness as a beacon light. In Danger and Defense: The Technique of Close Process Attention, ed. M. Goldberger.Northvale, NJ: Aronson, pp. 263—290.
25.
Levy, S.T., & Inderbitzin, L.B. (1990). The analytic surface and the theory of technique. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association38:371—391.
26.
Lewis, H.B. (1971). Shame and Guilt in Neurosis. New York: International Universities Press.
27.
Lichtenberg, J., Lachmann, F., & Fosshage, J. (1996). The Clinical Exchange. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
28.
Loewenstein, R.M. (1954). Some remarks on defences, autonomous ego and psycho-analytic technique. International Journal of Psycho-analysis35:188—193.
29.
Piers, G., & Singer, M. (1953). Shame and Guilt: A Psychoanalytic and Cultural Study. New York: Norton, 1971.
30.
Pray, M. (1996). Analyzing defense: Two different methods. In Danger and Defense: The Technique of Close Process Attention, ed. M. Goldberger.Northvale, NJ: Aronson, pp. 53—106.
31.
Reich, W. (1928). On character analysis. In The Psychoanalytic Reader, ed. R. Fliess.New York: International Universities Press, 1969, pp. 129—147.
32.
Waelder, R. (1930). The principle of multiple function: Observations on overdetermination. In Psychoanalysis: Observation, Theory, Application. New York: International Universities Press, 1976, pp. 68—83.
33.
Wortis, J. (1954). Fragments of an Analysis with Freud. New York: Aronson, 1984.
