Disrupting the Field

Abstract

This article discusses the challenges involved in constructing a field of study when the social relations in question involve multiple locations, objects, and stories about them. This article argues that the geographical, social, technical, and conceptual uncertainties presented by virtual systems problematize conventional constructions of the field and fieldwork, and require a flexible and “multisited” methodological approach. The article draws on experiences researching virtual reality technologies, and outlines the multisited ethnographic methods used in response to the methodological challenges involved. It outlines strategies of following objects, following people, and following stories to construct a flexible and multiple field of research. Such strategies are consistent with theoretical developments in feminist poststructuralism and science and technology studies that seek to deconstruct the coherence of the research process. The article argues that it is crucial to develop such methodological approaches in order to make nuanced critique of technology development, production, and consumption into the next millennium.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Appadurai, A. (Ed.). (1986). The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Benedikt, M. (Ed.). (1991). Cyberspace: First steps. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Biocca, F. (1992). Communication within virtual reality: Creating a space for research. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 5-22.

Bourdieu, P. , & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bromley, D. G. , & Shupe, A. D. (1980). Evolving foci in participant observation: Research as an emergent process. In W.B. Shaffir , R.A. Stebbins , & A. Turowetz (Eds.), Fieldwork experience: Qualitative approaches to social research. New York: St. Martin's.

Butler, J. , & Scott, J. (Eds.). (1992). Feminists theorize the political. New York: Routledge.

Caughey, J. (1984). Imaginary social worlds. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Clifford, J. , & Marcus, G. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Game, A. (1991). Undoing the social: Towards a deconstructive sociology. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.

10.

Gibson, W. (1986). Neuromancer. London: Grafton. (Original work published 1984)

11.

Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.

12.

Haraway, D. (1992). Promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In L. Grossberg , C. Nelson , & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies. New York: Routledge.

13.

Haraway, D. (1997a). The virtual speculum in the New World Order. Feminist Review, 55, 22-72.

14.

Haraway, D. (1997b). Modest_witness@second_millenium. Female-man©_meets_oncomouse™: Feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge.

15.

Harding, S. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

16.

Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women's lives . Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.

17.

Heim, M. (1993). The essence of VR. Idealistic Studies, 23(1), 49-62.

18.

Heim, M. (1998). Virtual realism. New York: Oxford University Press.

19.

Lather, P. (1989). Deconstructing/deconstructive enquiry: Issues in feminist research methodologies. Paper presented at the New Zealand Women's Studies Association Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand.

20.

Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.

21.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

22.

Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

23.

Law, J. (1987). Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portugese expansion. In W. E. Bijker , T. P. Hughes , & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

24.

Law, J. (Ed.). (1991). A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination. London: Routledge.

25.

Leonard, B. (Producer), & Everett, G. (Director). (1992). The lawnmower man [Film]. (Available from August Entertainment, 838 North Fairfax Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90046)

26.

Lovy, S. (Producer), & Reich, S. , & Schouweler, J. (Directors). (1990). Circuitry man [Videorecording]. (Available from Columbia, 711 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10022)

27.

Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95-117.

28.

Martin, E. (1994). Flexible bodies: Tracking immunity in American culture from the days of polio to the age of AIDS. Boston: Beacon Press.

29.

Plant, S. (1997). Zeros + ones: Digital women + the new technoculture. New York: Doubleday.

30.

Squires, J. (1996). Fabulous feminist futures and the lure of cyberculture. In J. Dovey (Ed.), Fractal dreams: New media in social context. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

31.

Star, S. L. (1991). Power, technologies and the phenomenology of conventions: On being allergic to onions. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 26-56). London: Routledge.

32.

Stephenson, N. (1992). Snow crash. New York: Bantam Books.

33.

Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73-93.

34.

Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. Cambridge. MA: Basil Blackwell, Polity Press.

35.

Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.