Meanings of Merit

Abstract

What does discussion of higher education issues tell us about fundamental societal questions? Merit appears to underpin the major issues in higher education at the moment. Yet an inspection of these issues suggests that this is really about larger tensions that we may wish to avoid, such as the role of experts in a democracy, specifically their degree of professional autonomy in setting content and performance standards. A new unifying purpose for higher education—articulate judgement—may allow us to address these societal issues more clearly and the role of higher education more publicly and directly. Fundamentally, we must decide what role we want for the academic professions and how we place articulate judgement in their endeavor. Do we have the moral confidence in our enterprise to assert a capacity and a responsibility for independent, informed, deliberative, and humane judgment and for the capacity to elicit the same in our students?

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Archibold, R. (1998). Just because the grades are up, are Princeton students smarter? The New York Times. Available: http://archives.nytimes.com/archives/search/fastweb?get-doc+allyears2+db365+92984+10+wAAA+Archibold.

Barton, P. E. , & Lapointe, A. (1994). Learning by degrees: Indicators of performance in higher education. Princeton, NJ: Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service.

Chodorow, S. (1997). Taking the humanities off life support. In T. Bender , S. Chodorow , & P. Yu (Eds.), The transformation of humanistic studies in the twenty-first century: Opportunities and perils (ACLS Occasional Paper No. 40). New York: American Council of Learned Societies.

Dornbusch, S. M. (1994). Off the track. San Diego, CA: Society for Research on Adolescence.

The Education Trust . (1998). Achievement in America. Washington, DC: Author.

Education Week . (1997). Quality counts. Washington, DC: Education Week, Pew Charitable Trusts.

Ellis, J. M. (1997). Literature lost: Social agendas and the corruption of the humanities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Gordon, E. W. (1996). Educational standards and alternatives in educational reform. New York: The College Board.

Kane, T. J. Racial and ethnic preference in college admissions . Paper presented at the Conference of the Harvard Civil Rights Project, Cambridge, MA.

10.

Krause, E. A. (1996). Death of the guilds: Professions, states, and the advance of capitalism, 1930 to the present. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

11.

Metzger, W. (1987). A spectre is haunting American scholars: The spectre of professionism. In L. Goodchild & H. Wechsler (Eds.), The history of education (2nd ed., pp. 653-666). New York: Simon & Schuster.

12.

Miami-Dade Community College. (1998). Welcome page. Available: http://www.wolfson.mdcc.edu/mdcc/mdejp01.html

13.

Neilson, W. A. (1926). Charles W. Eliot, the man and his beliefs (2 vols.). New York: Harper.

14.

Nettles, M. T. , & Perna, L. W. (1997). The role affirmative action in expanding student access at selective colleges and universities. Fairfax, VA: The Frederick D. Patterson Research Institute of the United Negro College Fund.

15.

Rothblatt, S. (1997). The “place” of knowledge in the American academic profession. Daedalus, 126(4), 245-264.

16.

Snyder, T. D. (Ed.). (1993). 120 years of American education: A statistical portrait. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.