ASHER, B. (1976) Causal Modeling. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Science. Series 07-003. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
CAPLAN, N. (1977) “A minimal set of conditions necessary for the utilization of social science knowledge in policy formulation at the national level,” pp. 183-198 in C. H. Weiss (ed.) Using Social Science Research in Public Policy Making. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
3.
CAPLAN, N. (1979) “The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization.”Amer. Behavior Scientist22: 459-470.
4.
DUNN, E. (1980) “The two-communities metaphor and models of knowledge use: an exploratory case survey.”Knowledge1: 515-536.
5.
FELLER, I. (1975) Sources and Uses of Scientific and Technological Information in State Legislatures. University Park, PA: Center for the Study of Science Policy.
6.
FELLER, I. et al. (1979) “Scientific and technical information in state legislatures.”Amer. Behavioral Scientist22: 417-436.
7.
LINDBLOM, E. and D. K. COHEN (1979) Usable Knowledge. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
8.
STEPHENSON, M. O. , D. J. WEBBER, and D. G. WILLIAMS (1986) “Plenary review: a structured interactive information-processing model.” Presented at the 1986 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Public Administration, Anaheim, CA, April 13-16.
9.
WEBBER, D. J. (1983) “Conflicting worldviews, competing disciplinary-matrices, and the utilization of systematic policy analysis.”Knowledge4: 534-560.
10.
WEBBER, D. J. (1984) “Political conditions motivating legislators' use of policy information.”Policy Studies Rev. 4: 110-118.
11.
WEBBER, D. J. (1985) “State legislators' use of policy information: the importance of legislative goals.”State and Local Government Rev. 17: 213-218.
12.
WEBBER, D. J. (1986a) “The contours and complexity of legislators' objectives: empirically examining the basis of purposive models.”Western Pol. Q. 39: 93-103.
13.
WEBBER, D. J. (1986b) “Explaining policy-makers' use of policy information: the relative importance of the two-community theory vs. decision-maker orientation.”Knowledge7: 249-290.
14.
WEISS, C. H. (1977) “Introduction,” pp. 1-22 in C. H. Weiss (ed.) Using Social Science Research in Public Policy-Making. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
15.
WEISS, C. H. (1979) “The many meanings of research utilization.”Public Admin. Rev. 39: 426-431.
16.
WEISS, C. H. (1980) “Knowledge creep and decision accretion.”Knowledge1: 381-404.
17.
WISSEL, P. et al. (1976) “The hunting of the legislative snark: information searches and reforms in U.S. state legislatures.”Legislative Studies Q. 1, 251-267.
18.
ZELLER, R. A. and E. G. CARMINES (1980) Measurement in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
19.
ZWIER, R. (1979) “The search for information specialists and non-specialists in the U.S. House of Representatives.”Legislative Studies Q. 4: 31-42.
