BALLARD, S. C. , and T. E. JAMES, Jr. (1983) “Participatory research and utilization in the technology assessment process: issues and recommendations.”Knowledge4: 409-427.
2.
BROWNE, W. P. and D. F. HADWIGER [eds.] (1982) “Symposium on rural policy.”Policy Studies Rev. 2: 9-11.
3.
BRUNNER, R. D. (1984) “Integrating knowledge and action.”Policy Sciences17: 3-12.
4.
GLASER, E. M. , H. H. ABELSON, and K. N. GARISON (1983) Putting Knowledge to Use. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
HADDEN, S. G. [ed.] (1982) “Symposium on public policy toward risk.”Policy Studies Rev. 1: 651-655.
6.
HANSEN, S. B. (1983) “Public policy analysis: some recent developments and current problems,” in M. Finifter (ed.) Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
7.
LINDBLOM, C. E. , and D. K. COHEN (1979) Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
8.
National Research Council (1978) The Federal Investment in Knowledge of Social Problems. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9.
National Research Council (1981) Atmosphere-Biosphere Interactions: Toward a Better Understanding of the Ecological Consequences of Fossil Fuel Combustion. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10.
National Research Council (1984) Earthquake Engineering Facilities and Instrumentation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11.
National Research Council (1985) Dredging the Coastal Ports: An Assessment of the Issues. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
12.
Office of Technology Assessment (1985) Oil and Gas Technologies for Arctic and Deepwater. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
13.
RICHARDSON, H. (1983) “The relevance of urban economic theory to urban policy analysis.”Policy Studies Rev. 3: 45-51.
14.
ROESSNER, J. D. [ed.] (1984) “Symposium on innovation policy.”Policy Studies Rev. 3: 429-435.
15.
SEIDEL, A. (1983) “Producing usable research: a selected review.”Policy Studies Rev. 3: 52-57.
16.
THOMPSON, L. (1983) “An assessment of urban reinvestment policy.”Policy Studies Rev. 3: 67-78.
