ACLAND, H. (1980) “Research as stage-management: the case of the Plowden Committee,” pp. 34-57 in M. Bulmer (ed.) Social Research and Royal Commissions. London: Allen & Unwin.
2.
BELL, D. (1966) “Government by Commission.”Public Interest3 (Spring): 3-9.
3.
BULMER, M. (1982) The Uses of Social Research. London: Allen & Unwin.
4.
BULMER, M. (1981) “Charles S. Johnson, Robert E. Park, and the research methods of the Chicago Commission on Race Relations, 1919-22”Ethnic and Racial Studies4 (July): 289-306.
5.
BULMER, M. (1980a) “The Royal Commission on the Distribution of Income and Wealth,” pp. 158-179 in M. Bulmer (ed.) Social Research and Royal Commissions. London: Allen & Unwin.
6.
BULMER, M. [ed.] (1980b) Social Research and Royal Commissions. London: Allen & Unwin.
7.
BULMER, M. [ed.] (1978) Social Policy Research. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities.
8.
CARTWRIGHT, T. J. (1975) Royal Commissions and Departmental Committees in Britain. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
9.
CHAPMAN, R. A. [ed.] (1973) The Role of Commissions in Policy-Making. London: Allen & Unwin.
10.
CHECKLAND, S. and E. CHECKLAND (1974) The Poor Law Report of 1834. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
11.
Chicago Commission on Race relations (1922) The Negro in Chicago. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
12.
CLEVELAND, H. (1964) “Inquiry into presidential inquiries,” pp. 291-294 in D. B. Johnson and J. L. Walker (eds.) The Dynamics of the American Presidency. New York: John Wiley.
13.
CLOKIE, H. M. and J. W. ROBINSON (1937) Royal Commissions of Inquiry. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.
14.
COSER, L. A. (1956) The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: Free Press.
15.
CRONIN, T. E. and S. D. GREENBERG [eds.] (1969) The Presidential Advisory System. New York: Harper & Row.
16.
DEAN, A. L. (1969) “Ad hoc Commissions for Policy Formulation?” pp. 101-116 in T. E. Cronin and S. D. Greenberg (eds.) The Presidential Advisory System. New York: Harper & Row.
17.
DERTHICK, M. (1971) “On commissionship—presidential variety.”Public Policy19: 623-638.
18.
DIBELIUS, W. (1930) England. London: Jonathan Cape.
19.
DONNISON, D. (1980) “Committees and committeemen,” pp. 9-17 in M. Bulmer (ed.) Social Research and Royal Commissions. London: Allen & Unwin.
20.
DREW, E. (1968) “On giving oneself a hotfoot: government by commission.”Atlantic221 (May): 45-49.
21.
FLOWERDEW, A.D.J. (1980) “A commission and a cost-benefit study,” pp. 85-109 in M. Bulmer (ed.) Social Research and Royal Commissions. London: Allen & Unwin.
22.
GOSNELL, H. F. (1934) “British royal commissions of inquiry.”Pol. Sci. Q. 49: 84-118.
23.
HALL, P. (1980) “The Seebohm Committee and the under-use of research,” pp. 67-84 in M. Bulmer (ed.) Social Research and Royal Commissions. London: Allen & Unwin.
24.
HAMILTON, Lord G. (1922) Parliamentary Reminiscences and Reflections 1886-1906. London: Murray.
25.
HANSER, C. J. (1965) Guide to Decision: The Royal Commission. Totowa, NJ: Bedminster.
26.
HERBERT, A. P. (1961) “Anything but action? A study of the uses and abuses of committees of inquiry,” in R. Harris (ed.) Radical Reaction. London: Hutchinson.
27.
HOOD, R. (1974) “Criminology and penal change: a case study of the nature and impact of some recent advice to government,” pp. 375-390 in R. Hood (ed.) Crime, Criminology and Public Policy. London: Heinemann.
28.
KARL, B. E. (1969) “Presidential planning and social science research: Mr. Hoover's experts.”Perspectives in American History3: 347-409.
29.
Kerner Report (1968) Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
30.
KILROY-SILK, R. (1973) The Donovan Royal Commission on Trade Unions,” pp. 42-80 in R. A. Chapman (ed.) The Role of Commissions in Policy-Making. London: Allen & Unwin.
31.
KOMAROVSKY, M. [ed.] (1975) Sociology and Public Policy: the Case of the Presidential Commissions. New York: Elsevier-North Holland.
32.
KRAFT, J. (1969) “The Washington lawyers,” pp. 150-155 in T. E. Cronin and S. D. Greenberg (eds.) The Presidential Advisory System. New York: Harper & Row.
33.
LARSEN, O. N. (1975) “The Commission on Obscenity and Pornography: form, function and failure,” pp. 9-41 in M. Komarovsky (ed.) Sociology and Public Policy: The Case of Presidential Commissions. New York: Elsevier-North Holland.
34.
LEHMANN, W. (1968) “Crime, the public and the crime commission: a critical review of “`the challenge of crime in a free society.'”Michigan Law Rev. 66 (May): 1487-1540.
35.
LIPSKY, M. and D. J. OLSON (1977) Commission Politics: The processing of racial crisis in America. Rutgers NJ: Transaction.
36.
MARX, K. (1959) [1867] Capital. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
37.
McGREGOR, O. R. (1980) “The Royal Commission on the Press, 1974-7: a note,” pp. 150-157 in M. Bulmer (ed.) Social Research and Royal Commissions. London: Allen & Unwin.
38.
McGREGOR, O. R. (1957) “Social research and social policy in the nineteenth century.”British J. of Sociology8: 146-157.
39.
McPHERSON, H. (1981) “Hot potatoes.”Public Interest62 (Winter): 86-89.
40.
MERTON, R. K. (1981) Personal communication, October 6.
41.
MERTON, R. K. (1975) “Social knowledge and public policy: sociological perspectives on four presidential commissions,” pp. 153-157 in M. Komarovsky (ed.) Sociology and Public Policy: The Case of the Presidential Commission. New York: Elsevier-North Holland.
42.
OHLIN, L. E. (1975) “The President's Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice,” pp. 93-115 in M. Komarovsky (ed.) Sociology and Public Policy: The Case of the Presidential Commission. New York: Elsevier-North Holland.
43.
PINKER, R. A. (1971) Social Theory and Social Policy. London: Heinemann.
44.
PLATT, A. [ed.] (1971) The Politics of Riot Commissions 1917-1970. New York: Macmillan.
45.
POPPER, F. (1970) The President's Commissions. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
46.
PREST, A. R. (1980) “Royal commission reporting,” pp. 180-188 in M. Bulmer (ed.) Social Research and Royal Commissions. London: Allen & Unwin.
47.
RHODES, G. (1980) “The Younger Committee and Research,” pp. 110-121 in M. Bulmer (ed.) Social Research and Royal Commissions. London: Allen & Unwin.
48.
RIST, R. (1973) “Polity, politics and research: a study in the relationship of federal commissions and social science.”Social Problems21 (Summer): 113-128.
SHARPE, L. J. (1980) “Research and the Radcliffe-Maud Commission,” pp. 18-33 in M. Bulmer (ed.) Social Research and Royal Commissions. London: Allen & Unwin.
51.
SHARPE, L. J. (1978) “Government as clients for social science research,” pp. 67-82 in M. Bulmer (ed.) Social Research and Royal Commissions. London: Allen & Unwin.
52.
SHONFIELD, A. (1980) “In the course of investigation,” pp. 58-66 in M. Bulmer (ed.) Social Research and Royal Commissions. London: Allen & Unwin.
53.
SHORT, J. F., Jr. [ed.] (1978) Delinquency, Crime and Society. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
54.
SHORT, J. F., Jr. (1975) “The National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence: the contributions of sociology and sociologists, pp. 61-91 in M. Komarovsky (ed.) Sociology and Public Policy: The Case of the Presidential Commission. New York: Elsevier-North Holland.
55.
SKOLNICK, J. H. (1970) “Violence commission violence.”Transaction7 (October): 32-38.
56.
SULZNER, G. T. (1971) “The policy process and the uses of national governmental study commissions.”Western Pol. Q. 24: 438-448.
57.
TAVUCHIS, N. (1982) Personal communication, February 10.
58.
THOMAS, H. [ed.] (1959) The Establishment. London: Blond.
59.
TUNSTALL, J. (1980) “The Royal Commission on the Press, 1974-7,” pp. 122-149 in M. Bulmer (ed.) Social Research and Royal Commissions. London: Allen & Unwin.
60.
Violence Commission (1970) To Establish Justice, To Ensure Domestic Tranquility: The Final Report of the National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
61.
WASKOW, A. I. (1967) From Race Riot to Sit In: 1919 and the 1960's. New York: Doubleday.
62.
WEBB, B. (1948) Our Partnership. London: Longmans.
63.
WEBB, S. and B. WEBB (1932) Methods of Social Study. London: Longmans.
64.
WESTHOFF, C. F. (1975) “The Commission on Population Growth and the American Future: origins, operations and aftermath,” pp. 43-59 in M. Komarovsky (ed.) Sociology and Public Policy: The Case of the Presidential Commission. New York: Elsevier-North Holland.
65.
WHEARE, K. C. (1955) Government by Committee, Oxford: Clarendon.
66.
WILSON, J. Q. (1971) “Violence, pornography and social science.”Public Interest22 (Winter): 45-61.
67.
WOLANIN, T. R. (1975) Presidential Advisory Commissions: Truman to Nixon. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.