ABT, W. P. and J. MAGIDSON (1980) Reforming Schools: Problems in Program Implementation and Evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
ANDERSON, S. and S. BALL (1978) The Profession and Practice of Program Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BALTZELL, C. (1980) The standardized case study: A hyprid approach to the qualitative/quantitative issue. Presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
4.
CAMPBELL, D. (1979) “Qualitative knowing in action research,” in T. Cook and C. Reichardt (eds.) Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Social Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5.
COOK, T. and D. COOK (1979) Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
6.
COOK, T. and C. REICHARDT [eds.] (1979) Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
CORBETT, H. and W. FIRESTONE (1980) Constructing Case Studies on Educational Change for Policy Makers. Philadephia: Research for Better Schools.
8.
CRAIN, R. (1977) “Racial tension in high schools: pushing the survey method closer to reality.”Anthropology and Education Q.8 (May): 142-151.
9.
DENZIN, R. (1978) The Research Act. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10.
FIENBERG, S. (1977) “The collection and analysis of ethnographic data in educational research.”Anthropology and Education Q.8 (May): 50-57.
11.
GILBERT, J. , R. LIGHT, and F. MOSTELLER (1975) “Assessing social innovations: an empirical base for policy,” in A. Bennet and A. Lumsdaine, Evaluation and Experiment: Some Critical Issues in Assessing Social Programs. New York: Academic Press.
12.
KING, N. (1980) Staff Development Programs in Desegregated Seetings, Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
13.
KNAPP, M. (1979) “Ethnographic contributions to evaluation research. The Experimental Schools Program and some alternatives,” pp. 118-139 in T. Cook and C. Reichardt (eds.) Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
McDONAG, E. and K. SCHWIRIAN (1981) “Changes needed in graduate sociology training for the '80s.”Footnotes (October): 9.
15.
MILES, M. (1979) “Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance: the problem of analysis.”Admin. Sci. Q.24 (December): 590-601.
16.
PRESSMAN, J. and A. WILDAVSKY (1973) Implementation. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
17.
RIST, R. (1977) “On the relations among educational research paradigms: from disdain to detente.”Antropology and Education Q.8 (May): 42-49.
18.
ROYSTER, E. and C. BALTZELL (1979) An Evaluation of the ESAA Magnet Schools Program: Final Report. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
19.
RUTMAN, L. (1979) Designing Useful Evaluations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
SCRIVEN, M. (1972) “Objectivity/subjectivity in educational research,” in H. B. Dunkie et al. (eds.) Philosophical Redirection of Educational Research. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
21.
SIEBER, S. D. (n.d.) A review of analysis procedures in textbooks of qualitative methods. (unpublished)
22.
SIEBER, S. D. (1973) “The integration of field methods and survey research.”Amer. J. of Sociology78 (Spring): 1335-1359.
23.
Strauch, R. (1976) “A critical look at quantitative methodology.”Policy Analysis2 (Winter): 121-143.
24.
SUNDQUIST, J. (1978) “Research brokerages: the weak link,” in L. E. Lynn (ed.), Knowledge and Policy: The Uncertain Connection. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
25.
TREND, M. (1978) “On the reconciliation of quantitative and qualitative analyses.”Human Organization37: 345-354.
26.
WEISS, C. (1972) Evaluation Research: Methods of Assessing Program Effectiveness. New York: Prentice-Hall.
27.
YIN, R. (1981a) “The case study as a serious research strategy.”Knowledge3 (September): 97-114.
28.
YIN, R. (1981b) “The case study crisis: some answers.”Admin. Sci. Q.26 (March): 58-66.
29.
YIN, R. (1978) Tinkering with the System: Technological Innovations in State and Local Services. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
30.
ZETTERBERG, H. (1965) On Theory and Vertification in Sociology. Tottowa, NJ: Bedminster.