Social sciences inevitably both trigger and enforce social change. However, current sociology has become more analysis oriented than action oriented. Futures studies can improve sociological thinking by its general cross-disciplinary approach, methods that emphasize alternatives and encourage participation in public discussions and decision making. The author discusses the idea of evolutionary transition as progressive differentiation toward increasing complexity that explains social change. This theory is then used to explore images of the future that arise from different interpretations of the present (Western) transition from modernity through late modernity to postmodernity and, similarly, from industrialism through late industrialism to a new epoch. The images consist of items that reflect the simultaneous existence of different and partly contradictory interpretations of reality that reflect socioeconomic and cultural change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allardt, E. (1995). Tiede ja olennaiset kysymykset [Science and the fundamental question]. Tiedepolitiikka, 20(4), 5-12.
2.
Allen, P. (1993). Coherence, chaos and evolution in the social context. In M. Mannermaa, S. Inayatullah, & R. Slaughter (Eds.), Coherence and chaos in our uncommon futures—Visions, means, actions (pp. 11-22). Turku: Finland Futures Research Centre.
3.
Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
4.
Bauman, Z. (1996). Postmodern lumo [The enchantment of postmodernism] (P.-L. Ahponen & T. Cantell, Eds.). Tampere, Finland: Vastapaino.
5.
Beck, U. (1996). Politiikan uudelleen keksiminen: Kohti refleksiivisen modernisaation teoriaa [Reinventing politics: Toward the theory of reflexive modernization]. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Nykyajan jälijillä. Jyväskylä: Vastapaino. (Finnish translation by L. Lehto from Reflexive Modernization, Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Polity Press, 1994)
6.
Bell, W. (1997). Foundations of futures studies: Human science for a new era: Vol. 1. History, purposes, knowledge. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
7.
Bell, W. (1998). Making people responsible: The possible, the probable, and the preferable. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(3), 323-339.
8.
Bjerstedt, Å. (1992). Conceptions of future threats and developments: Psychological starting points and educational possibilities. In U. Svedin & B. Aniasson (Eds.), Society and the environment (pp. 229-255). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
9.
Boulding, E. , & Boulding, K. S. (1995). The future: Images and processes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Covey, S. (1992). The seven habits of highly effective people: Powerful lessons in personal change. London: Simon & Schuster. (Original work published 1989)
11.
Dator, J. (1979). The futures of culture/cultures of the future. In A. Marsella, R. G. Tharp, & T. J. Ciborowski (Eds.), Perspectives in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 369-388). New York: Academic Press.
12.
Etzioni, A. (1988). Normative-Affective factors: Toward a new decision-making model. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9(2), 125-150.
13.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
14.
Giddens, A. (1996). In defence of sociology: Essays, interpretations & rejoinders. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
15.
Hellsten, S. (1997). Markkinarationalismista moraaliseen individualismiin [From market rationalism to moral individualism]. Kanava, 25(9), 499-503.
16.
Hirsjärvi, S. , & Remes, P. (1986). Voidaanko tulevaisuuteen vaikuttaa? Koulutus ja tietoyhteiskunta-tutkimuksen osaraportti [Can the future be affected? Partial report on the project of Education and the Information Society] (Publication Series A1). Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä, Institute for Educational Research.
17.
Inayatullah, S. (1993). From “who am I” to “when am I?”: Framing the time and shape of the future. Futures, 25(3), 235-253.
18.
Laszlo, E. (Ed.). (1991). The new evolutionary paradigm. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
19.
Laszlo, E. (1996). Evolution: The general theory. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
20.
Malaska, P. (1991). Economic and social evolution: Transformational dynamic approach. In E. Laszlo (Ed.), The new evolutionary paradigm. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
21.
Malaska, P. (1993). Tulevaisuustietoisuus ja tulevaisuuteen tunkeutuminen [Futures awareness and piercing into the future]. In M. Vapaavuori (Ed.), Miten tutkimme tulevaisuutta. Acta Futura Fennica, 5, 6-12.
Mannermaa, M. , Inayatullah, S., & Slaughter, R. (Eds.). (1993). Coherence chaos in our uncommon futures—Visions, Means, Actions. Turku: Finland Futures Research Centre.
24.
Masini, E. B. (1993). Why futures studies?London: Grey Seal.
25.
Masini, E. B. (1998). Futures studies from the experience of a sociologist who tries to be a futurist. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(3), 340-346.
26.
Milbrath, L. (1989). Envisioning a sustainable society: Learning our way out. Albany: State University of New York Press.
27.
Nurmi, J.-E. (1995). Tavoitteet, keinot ja illuusiot—ihminen tulevaisuutensa tekijänä [Aims, means and illusions—Human as the maker of his/her future]. Tiedepolitiikka, 1, 5-12.
28.
Pantzar, M. (1991). A replicative perspective on evolutionary dynamics: The organizing process of the U.S. economy elaborated through a biological metaphor (Research Report 37). Helsinki, Finland: Labour Institute for Economic Research.
29.
Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge.
30.
Remes, P. (1993). Future readiness in vocational adult education (Institute for Educational Research, Publication Series A; Research Reports 52). Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.
31.
Rubin, A. (1995). Ote huomiseen. Tulevaisuustietoisuus opetuksessa [Grasping tomorrow: Futures awareness in education] (Monograph). Tulevaisuussarja, 5.
32.
Rubin, A. (1996). Alas apatia. Tulevaisuus omiin käsiin [Down with apathy: Taking future into one's own hands]. In P. Remes & A. Rubin (Eds.), Tulevaisuutta etsimässä. Tulevaisuusteema opetuksessa (pp. 41-86). Helsinki, Finland: Board of Education.
33.
Taylor, C. (1991). The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
Toffler, A. (1974). Learning for tomorrow: The role of the future in education. New York: Vintage.
35.
von Wright, G.-H. (1988). Arvot ja tarpeet [Values and needs]. Opening lecture in von Wright colloquium series. Turku, Finland. (Reprinted from Futura, 7(1), 4-6)
36.
Whaley, C. , & Whaley, H. F. (1986). Future images: Futures studies for Grades 4 to 12. New York: Trillium.
