The eternal truth of the future cannot, of course, be the goal of futures studies. Future is full of surprises, uncertainty, trends and trend breaks, irrationality and rationality, and it is changing and escaping from our hands as time goes by. It is also the result of actions made by innumerable more or less powerful actors. In this article, the author describes the general features of futures studies, especially in its impact on societal development and decision making. The aim is also to show that the change in societal development has brought new challenges to the theoretical and methodological aspects of futures studies. Finally, the author discusses the problem of linking scenarios of the future to social and political decision making.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bell, W. (1997). Foundations of futures studies. (Vols. 1-2). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
2.
Csányi, V. (1989). Evolutionary systems and society: A general theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3.
Flood, R. L. (1987). Complexity: A definition by construction of a conceptual framework. Systems Research, 4(3), 177-185.
4.
Global 2000 Report to the President. (1980). (Vols. 1-3). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
5.
Laszlo, E. (1987). Evolution: The grand synthesis. Boston: New Science Library.
6.
Mannermaa, M. (1986). Futures research and social decision making: Alternative futures as a case study. Futures, 5, 658-670.
7.
Mannermaa, M. (1991). In search of an evolutionary paradigm for futures research. Futures, 23(4), 349-372.
8.
Mannermaa, M. (1992a). Brundtland Commission and social decision making: The case of Finland. In M. Mannermaa (Ed.), Linking present decisions to long-range visions: Selection of papers from the XI World Conference of the World Futures Studies Federation (WFSF). Budapest, pp. 122-136.
9.
Mannermaa, M. (Ed.). (1992b). Linking present decisions to long-range visions: Selection of papers from the XI World Conference of the World Futures Studies Federation (WFSF) (Vols. 1-2). Budapest, Hungary: World Futures Studies Federation.
10.
Mannermaa, M. (1995). Alternative futures perspectives on sustainability, coherence and chaos. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 3(1), 27-34.
11.
Mannermaa, M. (1996a). New tools and knowledge for a sustainable future. Futures, 28(6/7), 618-621.
12.
Mannermaa, M. (1996b). On the way to the knowledge-intensive society: Societal and educational development paths in the framework of futures studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 40(1), 25-41.
13.
Masini, E. (1993). Why futures studies?London: Grey Seal Books.
14.
Meadows, D. H. , Meadows, D. L., & Randers, J. (1992). Beyond the limits—Global collapse or sustainable future. London: Earthscan.
15.
Meadows, D. H. , Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.
16.
Ploman, E. (1984, July). Reflections of the state of the art and the interest of the United Nations University in the field of complexity. Paper presented at the Club of Rome Conference, Helsinki.
17.
Prigogine, I. (1985). New perspectives on complexity. In United Nations University: The science and praxis of complexity (pp. 107-118). Tokyo.
18.
Prigogine, I. , & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man's new dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam.
19.
Simmonds, W.H.C. (1988). Futures research: New starting points. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 33, 377-387.
20.
Slaughter, R. A. (1995). The foresight principle: Cultural recovery in the 21st century. London: Adamantine.
21.
Slaughter, R. A. (Ed.). (1996). New thinking for a new millennium. London: Routledge.
22.
Terk, E. , & Mannermaa, M. (1997). Baltic studies, futures studies. In European space, Baltic space, Polish space (pp. 149-157). Warsaw: ARL/Hannover-EUROREG/Warsaw.
23.
Toffler, A. , & Toffler, H. (1994). Creating a new civilization. Atlanta: Turner.
24.
United Nations University . (1985). The science and praxis of complexity (No. GLDB-2/UNUP-560). Tokyo: Author.
25.
van Steenbergen, B. (1987). The tension between technology and immaterial culture. Paper presented at the World Futures Studies Federation conference, Budapest.
26.
Weaver, W. (1948, October). Science and complexity. American Scientist, pp. 536-544.
27.
Williams, T. (1985). A science of change and complexity. Futures, 17(3), 263-268.
28.
World Commission on Environment and Development . (1987). Our common future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
